• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
From awareness to integration: a qualitative interview study on the impact of digital therapeutics on physicians' practices in Germany.从认知到整合:关于数字疗法对德国医生医疗实践影响的定性访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12656-2.
2
Insights Into How mHealth Applications Could Be Introduced Into Standard Hypertension Care in Germany: Qualitative Study With German Cardiologists and General Practitioners.关于移动健康应用程序如何引入德国标准高血压护理的见解:对德国心脏病专家和全科医生的定性研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Mar 28;13:e56666. doi: 10.2196/56666.
3
Health Literacy Promotion and Digital Interventions for Depressive Disorders.抑郁症的健康素养促进与数字干预
Health Lit Res Pract. 2024 Oct;8(4):e236-e245. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20240730-01. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
4
Exploring the General Acceptability and User Experience of a Digital Therapeutic for Cognitive Training in a Singaporean Older Adult Population: Qualitative Study.探索一款针对新加坡老年人群体认知训练的数字疗法的总体可接受性和用户体验:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 13;9:e63568. doi: 10.2196/63568.
5
Exploring Physicians' Dual Perspectives on the Transition From Free Text to Structured and Standardized Documentation Practices: Interview and Participant Observational Study.探索医生对从自由文本过渡到结构化和标准化文档实践的双重观点:访谈与参与观察研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 21;9:e63902. doi: 10.2196/63902.
6
Factors Influencing Physician Practices' Adoption of Behavioral Health Integration in the United States: A Qualitative Study.影响美国医生实践采用行为健康整合的因素:一项定性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jul 21;173(2):92-99. doi: 10.7326/M20-0132. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
7
Exploring Physicians' Perceptions of Digital Health's Impact on the Patient-Physician Relationship in the Primary Health Care Setting: Qualitative Descriptive Study.探索初级医疗保健环境中医生对数字健康对医患关系影响的看法:定性描述性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 15;26:e53705. doi: 10.2196/53705.
8
Benefits and Barriers to mHealth in Hypertension Care: Qualitative Study With German Health Care Professionals.移动医疗在高血压护理中的益处与障碍:对德国医疗保健专业人员的定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 10;12:e52544. doi: 10.2196/52544.
9
Primary care physicians' perceptions of hypertension management in Qatar: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.卡塔尔基层医疗医生对高血压管理的认知:一项运用理论领域框架的定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 24;20(4):e0318527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318527. eCollection 2025.
10
Therapies go digital. What drives physicians' acceptance?疗法走向数字化。是什么推动了医生的接受度?
PLoS One. 2024 May 10;19(5):e0303302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303302. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Adoption and perception of prescribable digital health applications (DiGA) and the advancing digitalization among German internal medicine physicians: a cross-sectional survey study.德国内科医生对可处方数字健康应用程序(DiGA)的采用和认知,以及不断推进的数字化:一项横断面调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):1353. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11807-1.
2
Using the behaviour change wheel to develop a tailored intervention to overcome general practitioners' perceived barriers to referring insomnia patients to digital therapeutic sleepio.利用行为改变轮盘制定一项定制干预措施,以克服全科医生认为将失眠患者转介到数字治疗睡眠应用程序(Sleepio)的障碍。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 22;24(1):967. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11384-3.
3
Understanding patient perspectives on digital therapeutics and its platform for insomnia: insights from focused group interviews.理解患者对数字治疗及其失眠平台的看法:来自焦点小组访谈的见解。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 29;24(1):859. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11286-4.
4
Rewiring care delivery through Digital Therapeutics (DTx): a machine learning-enhanced assessment and development (M-LEAD) framework.通过数字治疗(DTx)重新设计医疗服务提供:一个机器学习增强评估和开发(M-LEAD)框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 23;24(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10702-z.
5
[Digital health applications (DiGA) in the area of tension between progress and criticism : Discussion paper from the "Digital health" specialist group of the German Informatics Society].[进展与批评之间张力领域的数字健康应用(DiGA):德国信息学协会“数字健康”专家组的讨论文件]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Jan;67(1):107-114. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03804-2. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
6
Digital health applications from a government-regulated directory of reimbursable health apps in Germany-a systematic review for evidence and bias.德国政府监管的可报销健康应用程序目录中的数字健康应用——证据和偏差的系统评价
Mhealth. 2023 Jul 24;9:35. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-23-17. eCollection 2023.
7
Mapping Factors That Affect the Uptake of Digital Therapeutics Within Health Systems: Scoping Review.映射影响数字疗法在医疗体系内采用的因素:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 25;25:e48000. doi: 10.2196/48000.
8
Problems and Barriers Related to the Use of Digital Health Applications: Scoping Review.数字健康应用使用相关问题及障碍:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 12;25:e43808. doi: 10.2196/43808.
9
Patient Acceptance of Prescribed and Fully Reimbursed mHealth Apps in Germany: An UTAUT2-based Online Survey Study.德国患者对处方和全额报销的移动健康应用程序的接受度:基于 UTAUT2 的在线调查研究。
J Med Syst. 2023 Jan 27;47(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01910-x.
10
[How robust are studies of currently permanently included digital health applications (DiGA)? Methodological quality of studies demonstrating positive health care effects of DiGA].[目前永久纳入的数字健康应用程序(DiGA)的研究有多可靠?证明DiGA具有积极医疗保健效果的研究的方法学质量]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Dec;175:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.09.008. Epub 2022 Nov 24.

从认知到整合:关于数字疗法对德国医生医疗实践影响的定性访谈研究

From awareness to integration: a qualitative interview study on the impact of digital therapeutics on physicians' practices in Germany.

作者信息

Kendziorra Jennifer, Seerig Kirsten H, Winkler Till J, Gewald Heiko

机构信息

Chair of Information Management, University of Hagen, Hagen, Germany.

Institute for Digital Innovation (IDI), Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Neu-Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12656-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12656-2
PMID:40247268
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12007376/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The integration of digital therapeutics (DTx) into the German statutory healthcare system marks a significant shift in medical practice through the introduction of innovative, reimbursable digital interventions for patient care. While DTx can bridge therapy gaps and enhance patient care, the number of prescriptions is increasing slowly. This study aims to explore the challenges physicians face when integrating DTx into their treatment options and the changes this integration entails for their medical workflows.

METHODS

A qualitative approach was adopted, gathering data from semi-structured interviews with 46 physicians across Germany. Participants, sampled for diversity in specialty, experience, and region, were interviewed between June 2022 and August 2024. The interviews explored physicians' knowledge, experiences, and perspectives on DTx. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, combining deductive and inductive coding.

RESULTS

The introduction of DTx into physicians' workflows impacts their practice on multiple levels. First, physicians must become aware of the new regulations and therapeutic possibilities, requiring significant information intake and time to feel adequately prepared for prescribing DTx. Second, DTx add complexity to patient assessment, as physicians must evaluate factors such as digital literacy, motivation, and cognitive conditions, necessitating a deeper understanding of their patients. Third, the integration of DTx reshapes the physician‒patient relationship, as it alters interaction dynamics, redistributes responsibilities, and poses new communication challenges. Fourth, DTx expand therapeutic options, particularly by bridging therapy delays and enabling more personalized care. Finally, the integration of DTx has the potential to drive long-term changes in physicians' workflows and mindsets, fostering alignment with multimodal and patient-centered treatment approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

DTx offer opportunities for patient care but also pose challenges, such as the development of digital skills or familiarization with new regulations, that necessitate adjustments in physicians' workflows. Physicians are generally confronted with an innovation that demands time, reliable information on effectiveness, practical experience, and openness to adopting digital health tools as complementary treatment options. However, the reception and integration of DTx into treatment vary among physicians, reflecting individual preferences and approaches. Further research should explore these diverse adoption strategies and examine the long-term effects of DTx on care delivery and patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

将数字疗法(DTx)纳入德国法定医疗体系,通过引入创新的、可报销的数字干预措施用于患者护理,标志着医疗实践发生了重大转变。虽然数字疗法可以弥合治疗差距并改善患者护理,但处方数量增长缓慢。本研究旨在探讨医生在将数字疗法纳入其治疗选择时所面临的挑战,以及这种整合对其医疗工作流程带来的变化。

方法

采用定性研究方法,通过对德国46名医生进行半结构化访谈收集数据。参与者在专业、经验和地区方面具有多样性,于2022年6月至2024年8月期间接受访谈。访谈探讨了医生对数字疗法的知识、经验和看法。使用定性内容分析法对数据进行分析,结合演绎编码和归纳编码。

结果

将数字疗法引入医生的工作流程在多个层面影响他们的实践。首先,医生必须了解新法规和治疗可能性,这需要大量信息获取并花费时间才能为开具数字疗法处方做好充分准备。其次,数字疗法增加了患者评估的复杂性,因为医生必须评估数字素养、动机和认知状况等因素,这就需要更深入地了解患者。第三,数字疗法的整合重塑了医患关系,因为它改变了互动动态,重新分配了责任,并带来了新的沟通挑战。第四,数字疗法扩展了治疗选择,特别是通过弥合治疗延迟并实现更个性化的护理。最后,数字疗法的整合有可能推动医生工作流程和思维模式的长期变化,促进与多模式和以患者为中心的治疗方法保持一致。

结论

数字疗法为患者护理提供了机会,但也带来了挑战,如数字技能的培养或熟悉新法规,这需要医生调整工作流程。医生普遍面临一项需要时间、关于有效性的可靠信息、实践经验以及愿意将数字健康工具作为补充治疗选择的创新。然而,医生对数字疗法的接受和整合情况各不相同,反映了个人偏好和方法。进一步的研究应探索这些不同的采用策略,并研究数字疗法对护理提供和患者结局的长期影响。