D'Amato Salvatore A, Martinez Gutierrez Juan Carlos, Zeineddine Hussein A, Mohan Eric Claude, Nguyen Tien, Woon Cybele, Tang Rosa, Chen Peng Roc
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, John P. and Katherine G. McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
John P. and Katherine G. McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2025;19(1). doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2024-0100. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
In medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), venous sinus stenosis (VSS) stenting has been an effective treatment modality. Among patients who experience recurrent symptoms and develop new stenosis, the optimal treatment strategy is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of rescue re-stenting in patients with recurrence after prior successful stenting.
This was a single center, retrospective review from a prospectively maintained IIH registry. Between 2012 and 2023, patients who underwent interventions for confirmed IIH and angiographically demonstrable VSS were included. The cohort was divided into those who underwent a single stenting procedure (single stent group) and those who underwent re-stenting due to recurrence of symptoms and new angiographic stenosis (re-stent group).
Ninety seven patients were included: 87 in the single stent group and 10 in the re-stent group, with a median age of 32 (interquartile range 26-38). 94% were female. Both groups had similar baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. There was similar improvement in papilledema and tinnitus. Headache improvement was greater in the single stent group at 6 weeks (88.4% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.04, single vs. re-stent group), but similar at 6 months post-procedure. For visual disturbances, there was similar improvement at 6 weeks, but greater improvement in the single stent group at 6 months post-procedure (86.8% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.04, single vs. re-stent group). None of the re-stented patients required rescue ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement.
Re-stenting among IIH patients with recurrent symptoms after initial successful VSS stenting is feasible with similar efficacy in improving symptoms.
在药物治疗难治性特发性颅内高压(IIH)中,静脉窦狭窄(VSS)支架置入术一直是一种有效的治疗方式。在经历复发性症状并出现新狭窄的患者中,最佳治疗策略尚不清楚。本研究的目的是探讨补救性再次支架置入术在先前成功支架置入术后复发患者中的作用。
这是一项来自前瞻性维护的IIH登记处的单中心回顾性研究。2012年至2023年期间,纳入了因确诊IIH且血管造影显示有VSS而接受干预的患者。该队列分为接受单次支架置入术的患者(单次支架组)和因症状复发及新的血管造影狭窄而接受再次支架置入术的患者(再次支架组)。
共纳入97例患者:单次支架组87例,再次支架组10例,中位年龄为32岁(四分位间距26 - 38岁)。94%为女性。两组的基线人口统计学和临床特征相似。视乳头水肿和耳鸣的改善情况相似。单次支架组在6周时头痛改善情况更好(88.4%对60.0%,p = 0.04,单次支架组对再次支架组),但在术后6个月时相似。对于视觉障碍,6周时改善情况相似,但术后6个月时单次支架组改善情况更好(86.8%对75.0%,p = 0.04,单次支架组对再次支架组)。再次支架置入的患者均无需进行补救性脑室腹腔分流术。
对于初始成功的VSS支架置入术后出现复发性症状的IIH患者,再次支架置入术是可行的,在改善症状方面具有相似的疗效。