Suppr超能文献

静脉注射与神经周围注射地塞米松用于改良根治性乳房切除术患者超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞的比较——一项随机对照试验

Comparison of intravenous with perineural dexamethasone for ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy-A randomized control trial.

作者信息

Devrajan Gokila, Chhabra Priyanka H, Guria Sushil, Gupta Kapil

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Apr-Jun;41(2):357-362. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_134_24. Epub 2025 Mar 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Dexamethasone is used as an adjuvant to prolong the duration of peripheral nerve blocks. This study compares the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) versus perineural dexamethasone as an adjuvant to 0.5% ropivacaine for erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective, double-blind, randomized study was conducted on 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II adult females undergoing MRM under general anesthesia. Patients were divided into three groups: ropivacaine perineural dexamethasone (RPD), ropivacaine IV dexamethasone (RID), and ropivacaine normal saline (RNS). Time to rescue analgesia and morphine consumption over various time points (4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h) were recorded postoperatively. Pain was assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS).

RESULTS

The median time to first rescue analgesia was significantly higher in the RPD group (n = 20) 720 min [interquartile range (IQR: 465-1440), 95% confidence interval (CI): 638.78-1564.21)] in comparison to the RID group (n = 20) 435 min (IQR: 405-480, 95% CI: 284.8-811.1) and control (RNS) group (n = 20) 360 min (IQR: 240-415, 95% CI: 297.6-376.36) ( = 0.01). The median total morphine consumption in 24 h was least in the RPD group 2.0 mg (IQR: 1.0-3.0, 95% CI: 2-3) compared to the the RID 6.0 mg (IQR: 3.2-6.0, 95% CI: 6-8) and RNS groups 7.5 mg (IQR: 6.0-9.5, 95% CI: 6-8) ( = 0.01). The NRS scores both at rest and at physical activity were also lowest in the RPD group compared to other groups at various time points (4, 8,12, 24, and 48 h).

CONCLUSIONS

Perineural dexamethasone added as an adjuvant to 0.5% ropivacaine to ESPB prolongs the duration of analgesia, reduces morphine consumption, and reduces NRS scores at rest and physical activity as compared to IV dexamethasone in patients undergoing MRM.

摘要

背景与目的

地塞米松用作辅助药物以延长周围神经阻滞的持续时间。本研究比较静脉注射(IV)地塞米松与神经周围注射地塞米松作为辅助药物用于接受改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)患者的竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)时,与0.5%罗哌卡因联合使用的效果。

材料与方法

本前瞻性、双盲、随机研究纳入了60例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I/II级的成年女性,她们在全身麻醉下接受MRM。患者被分为三组:罗哌卡因神经周围注射地塞米松(RPD)组、罗哌卡因静脉注射地塞米松(RID)组和罗哌卡因生理盐水(RNS)组。术后记录不同时间点(4、8、12、24和48小时)的补救镇痛时间和吗啡消耗量。使用数字评分量表(NRS)评估疼痛。

结果

与RID组(n = 20)的435分钟(四分位间距[IQR]:405 - 480,95%置信区间[CI]:284.8 - 811.1)和对照组(RNS)(n = 20)的360分钟(IQR:240 - 415,95% CI:297.6 - 376.36)相比,RPD组(n = 20)首次补救镇痛的中位时间显著更长,为720分钟(IQR:465 - 1440,95% CI:638.78 - 1564.21)(P = 0.01)。RPD组24小时内吗啡总消耗量中位数最少,为2.0毫克(IQR:1.0 - 3.0,95% CI:2 - 3),而RID组为6.0毫克(IQR:3.2 - 6.0,95% CI:6 - 8),RNS组为7.5毫克(IQR:6.0 - 9.5,95% CI:6 - 8)(P = 0.01)。在各个时间点(4、8、12、24和48小时),与其他组相比,RPD组静息和活动时的NRS评分也最低。

结论

在接受MRM的患者中,与静脉注射地塞米松相比,在ESPB中添加神经周围注射地塞米松作为0.5%罗哌卡因的辅助药物可延长镇痛持续时间,减少吗啡消耗量,并降低静息和活动时的NRS评分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8766/12002690/1ff340c16534/JOACP-41-357-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验