Lauren Christopher, Niryana I Wayan, Mahadewa Tjokorda Gde Bagus
Neurosurgery Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Ngoerah Hospital, Denpasar, Indonesia.
Front Surg. 2025 Apr 3;12:1563256. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1563256. eCollection 2025.
Intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) classified as Spetzler-Martin (SM) grades III-V present significant therapeutic challenges due to their complex angioarchitecture and high risk of morbidity. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a minimally invasive modality for nidus obliteration, often combined with embolization to reduce nidus size and address high-risk vascular features. However, the impact of pre-SRS embolization on obliteration rates, post-SRS hemorrhage, and mortality remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the effects of embolization on SRS outcomes in high-grade AVMs.
Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and Google Scholar was conducted. Studies comparing SRS alone versus SRS with embolization in SM grade III-V AVMs were included. Primary outcomes were obliteration rates, post-SRS hemorrhage, and mortality. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and pooled analysis was conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) software.
Out of 4,186 identified studies, five high-quality cohort studies met inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed that SRS alone resulted in higher obliteration rates than SRS with embolization (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 0.92-4.65; =0.08), though not statistically significant. Post-SRS hemorrhage rates were comparable (OR: 3.07, 95% CI: 0.72-13.08; = 0.13), and mortality rates showed no significant difference (OR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.01-4.62; = 0.32).
Although embolization aids in nidus volume reduction, it may hinder radiosurgical efficacy by altering nidus architecture and introducing shielding effects. SRS alone demonstrated superior obliteration rates with fewer technical concerns. Individualized treatment planning remains essential, balancing embolization benefits against its potential drawbacks. Future studies should explore advancements in embolic agents and imaging techniques to optimize multimodal strategies for high-grade AVMs.
颅内动静脉畸形(AVM)分为Spetzler-Martin(SM)Ⅲ - Ⅴ级,因其复杂的血管结构和高发病风险,在治疗上面临重大挑战。立体定向放射外科治疗(SRS)是一种用于闭塞畸形瘤的微创方法,常与栓塞术联合使用以减小畸形瘤大小并处理高危血管特征。然而,SRS前栓塞术对闭塞率、SRS后出血及死亡率的影响仍存在争议。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估栓塞术对高级别AVM的SRS治疗效果的影响。
按照PRISMA指南,对PubMed、ScienceDirect、Cochrane和谷歌学术进行全面检索。纳入比较单纯SRS与SRS联合栓塞术治疗SMⅢ - Ⅴ级AVM的研究。主要结局指标为闭塞率、SRS后出血及死亡率。使用纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华量表进行数据提取和质量评估,并使用Review Manager(RevMan)软件进行汇总分析。
在4186项已识别的研究中,五项高质量队列研究符合纳入标准。汇总分析显示,单纯SRS的闭塞率高于联合栓塞术的SRS(比值比:2.06,95%置信区间:0.92 - 4.65;P = 0.08),但差异无统计学意义。SRS后出血率相当(比值比:3.07,95%置信区间:0.72 - 13.08;P = 0.13),死亡率无显著差异(比值比:0.21,95%置信区间:0.01 - 4.62;P = 0.32)。
尽管栓塞术有助于减小畸形瘤体积,但它可能通过改变畸形瘤结构和产生屏蔽效应而阻碍放射外科治疗效果。单纯SRS显示出更高的闭塞率且技术问题更少。个体化治疗方案仍然至关重要,要权衡栓塞术的益处及其潜在弊端。未来研究应探索栓塞剂和成像技术的进展,以优化高级别AVM的多模式治疗策略。