Greselin Martina, Lu Po-Jui, Mroczek Magdalena, Cerdá-Fuertes Nuria, Demirtzoglou Anastasios, Papadopoulou Athina, Kuhle Jens, Leppert David, Arnould Sophie, Aoun Manar, Kappos Ludwig, Granziera Cristina, D'Souza Marcus
Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Mult Scler. 2025 May;31(6):677-688. doi: 10.1177/13524585251327300. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
The Neurostatus-Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is the most frequently used measure of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) trials. However, EDSS scores ⩾4.5 are mainly based on ambulation and may fail to capture relevant disability patterns in other functional domains.
The objective was to determine how assessments categorized with the same EDSS score may reflect distinct disability patterns.
We analysed 13,103 assessments from 1636 people with secondary progressive MS, from the EXPAND trial. The data set is composed of Functional System scores (FSS) and their corresponding subscores, Ambulation scores and EDSS scores. We performed a descriptive analysis to define the relevant Functional Systems (FS). The subscores were then binarized based on the Neurostatus definition and grouped by respective EDSS scores. Finally, we applied two consecutive machine learning algorithms, to cluster the data. New subscore patterns were then created by aggregating clusters based on their dominant features.
The clustering algorithm yielded numerous clusters, grouping assessments with similar patterns. In patients with EDSS ⩾4.0, our approach allowed differentiation into four subscore patterns within the same EDSS score.
Applying Artificial Intelligence (AI) to large data sets of high-quality clinical assessments allows for distinguishing among different subscore patterns within identical EDSS scores.
神经状态扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)是多发性硬化症(MS)试验中最常用的残疾测量方法。然而,EDSS评分≥4.5主要基于行走能力,可能无法捕捉其他功能领域的相关残疾模式。
目的是确定具有相同EDSS评分的评估如何反映不同的残疾模式。
我们分析了来自EXPAND试验的1636例继发进展型MS患者的13103次评估。数据集由功能系统评分(FSS)及其相应的子评分、行走评分和EDSS评分组成。我们进行了描述性分析以定义相关的功能系统(FS)。然后根据神经状态定义将子评分进行二值化,并按各自的EDSS评分进行分组。最后,我们应用两种连续的机器学习算法对数据进行聚类。然后根据聚类的主要特征聚合聚类,创建新的子评分模式。
聚类算法产生了许多聚类,将具有相似模式的评估分组。在EDSS≥4.0的患者中,我们的方法允许在相同的EDSS评分内区分出四种子评分模式。
将人工智能(AI)应用于高质量临床评估的大数据集,可以在相同的EDSS评分内区分不同的子评分模式。