Suppr超能文献

心脏转甲状腺素蛋白介导的淀粉样变性特异性疗法的疗效和安全性:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

The efficacy and safety of specific therapies for cardiac Transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

作者信息

Prata Alonzo Armani, Katsuyama Eric Shih, Scardini Pedro Gabriel, Covre Ana Carolina, Neto Wilson Falco, Fernandes Julia Marques, Barbosa Gabriel Scarpioni, Fukunaga Chris, Pinheiro Rafael Petri, Antunes Vanio L J, Gioli-Pereira Luciana, Fernandes Fabio

机构信息

Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES) - Campus Maruípe, Avenida Marechal Campos, 1468, Vitória, ES, 29043-900, Brazil.

Department of Medicine, FMABC University Centre, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04653-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transthyretin (TTR) Cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is characterized by the deposition of misfolded TTR monomers in the heart, leading to progressive heart failure. TTR-specific therapies offer a pharmacological approach to slow disease progression. However, there remains limited data on the efficacy, comparative effectiveness, and safety of these therapies. Therefore, we aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TTR-specific therapies with placebo in patients with ATTR-CM.

METHODS

We searched through Pubmed, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Our primary outcome was: (1) All Cause Mortality. We also performed a subgroup analysis comparing TTR stabilizers versus TTR knock-down therapies (RNA inhibitors and antisense oligonucleotides).

RESULTS

Nine RCTs were included, involving 2,713 patients, of whom 1,160 (59.34%) were assigned to the TTR-specific therapies group. In the pooled analysis, TTR-specific therapies were associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.60, 0.83; p < 0.01; I² = 0%), with both TTR stabilizers and knock-down therapies showing equally effective reductions (p = 0.97). Additionally, TTR-specific therapies improved LV longitudinal strain (SMD - 0.22; 95% CI -0.34, -0.10; p < 0.01; I² = 17%) and reduced LV mass (SMD - 9.11 g; 95% CI -16.4 g, -1.82 g; p = 0.01; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis highlights the potential of TTR-targeting therapies as an effective option for managing ATTR-CM, with significant improvements in survival. No efficacy differences were found between TTR stabilizers and knock-down therapies.

摘要

背景

转甲状腺素蛋白(TTR)心肌病(ATTR-CM)的特征是错误折叠的TTR单体在心脏中沉积,导致进行性心力衰竭。TTR特异性疗法提供了一种减缓疾病进展的药理学方法。然而,关于这些疗法的疗效、比较有效性和安全性的数据仍然有限。因此,我们旨在对比较TTR特异性疗法与安慰剂治疗ATTR-CM患者的随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

我们检索了PubMed、Cochrane和Embase数据库。我们的主要结局是:(1)全因死亡率。我们还进行了亚组分析,比较TTR稳定剂与TTR敲低疗法(RNA抑制剂和反义寡核苷酸)。

结果

纳入了9项RCT,涉及2713例患者,其中1160例(59.34%)被分配到TTR特异性疗法组。在汇总分析中,TTR特异性疗法与全因死亡率显著降低相关(RR 0.70;95%CI 0.60,0.83;p<0.01;I² = 0%),TTR稳定剂和敲低疗法均显示出同样有效的降低效果(p = 0.97)。此外,TTR特异性疗法改善了左心室纵向应变(SMD -0.22;95%CI -0.34,-0.10;p<0.01;I² = 17%)并降低了左心室质量(SMD -9.11 g;95%CI -16.4 g,-1.82 g;p = 0.01;I² = 0%)。

结论

这项荟萃分析突出了靶向TTR疗法作为管理ATTR-CM的有效选择的潜力,在生存率方面有显著改善。TTR稳定剂和敲低疗法之间未发现疗效差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d9/12007281/6278e857b6a6/12872_2025_4653_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验