Wettemann Courteney, Morgan Jeffrey, Taylor Tara, Boll Ardina, Maxwell Scott, Richardson Lindsey, Nolan Seonaid, van Draanen Jenna
Department of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing, University of Washington, Washington, Health Sciences Building, Box 357262, Seattle, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Research with Expert Advisors on Drug Use, University of Washington, Washington, Health Sciences Building, Seattle, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Apr 18;22(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01217-9.
The implementation of supervised smoking facilities (SSFs) as a harm reduction intervention has public health benefits for people who inhale drugs, but there are significant knowledge gaps surrounding the perspectives of SSF visitors and staff on their implementation and accessibility. We conducted this study to learn about their perspectives on barriers and facilitators to accessibility at SSFs.
The study used a community-based participatory research study design. PWUD and SSF leadership were involved in all phases of the research project as members of the research team. Between June 2021 and April 2022, we conducted 10 qualitative semi-structured interviews with peer workers and stakeholders at an SSF in Vancouver, Canada to examine perspectives on how to facilitate accessibility for visitors. Interviews were analyzed using an abductive analytic approach, themes were defined and organized collaboratively by the research team.
Peer workers and SSF leadership interviewed in the study described aspects of the SSF that contributed to a low-barrier service model and resulted in greater accessibility for visitors, including: (1) non-punitive approaches to interpersonal challenges, (2) anonymity and privacy, (3) peer involvement, and (4) physical environment. Limitations to access were also described and included: (1) age restrictions, (2) geographical location and (3) infrequent, temporary bars for certain behaviors.
Findings from this study identified many dimensions of the low-barrier SSF service model and site design that may contribute to greater accessibility for SSF visitors. Findings from this study could be used to inform the scale-up and implementation of SSFs as a harm reduction approach to reducing mortality and other negative outcomes related to the current drug toxicity crisis.
实施受监管吸烟设施(SSF)作为一种减少伤害的干预措施,对吸毒者有公共卫生益处,但围绕SSF访客和工作人员对其实施和可及性的看法存在重大知识空白。我们开展这项研究是为了了解他们对SSF可及性的障碍和促进因素的看法。
该研究采用基于社区的参与性研究设计。吸毒者和SSF负责人作为研究团队成员参与了研究项目的所有阶段。2021年6月至2022年4月期间,我们在加拿大温哥华的一个SSF对同伴工作者和利益相关者进行了10次定性半结构化访谈,以探讨如何促进访客的可及性。访谈采用归纳分析方法进行分析,研究团队共同定义和组织主题。
研究中接受访谈的同伴工作者和SSF负责人描述了SSF有助于建立低门槛服务模式并提高访客可及性的方面,包括:(1)应对人际挑战的非惩罚性方法,(2)匿名性和隐私,(3)同伴参与,以及(4)物理环境。还描述了可及性的限制,包括:(1)年龄限制,(2)地理位置,以及(3)针对某些行为的不频繁、临时的限制。
本研究结果确定了低门槛SSF服务模式和场所设计的多个维度,这些维度可能有助于提高SSF访客的可及性。本研究结果可用于为扩大和实施SSF提供信息,作为一种减少伤害的方法,以降低与当前药物毒性危机相关的死亡率和其他负面结果。