Pyrgidis Nikolaos, Chaloupka Michael, Ebner Benedikt, Volz Yannic, Weinhold Philipp, Marcon Julian, Eismann Lennert, Stief Christian G, Schulz Gerald B, Apfelbeck Maria
Department of Urology, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
BJU Int. 2025 Aug;136(2):306-313. doi: 10.1111/bju.16746. Epub 2025 Apr 19.
To compare the perioperative complications of the most common focal therapy (FT) modalities for prostate cancer.
We assessed the GeRmAn Nationwide inpatient Data (GRAND) from 2005 to 2023, provided by the Research Data Center of the Federal Bureau of Statistics. We compared perioperative outcomes of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), hyperthermia, irreversible electroporation of the prostate, cryotherapy, vascular photodynamic therapy of the prostate (VTP), and transurethral ultrasound ablation, as well as HIFU vs non-HIFU treatments in general. Furthermore, we evaluated the role of concomitant transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) on perioperative complications. Finally, the complication rate of FT was also compared to brachytherapy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
A total of 10 544 underwent FT. Most patients received HIFU (92%). The number of FT cases performed annually has been steadily decreasing. The most prevalent complication (9.6%) was urinary tract infection (HIFU: 10%, hyperthermia: 6.2%, cryotherapy: 6.8%, VTP: 3.9%). Haematuria was observed in 3.6% of all cases. In the multivariable regression, HIFU was associated with higher rates of urinary tract infections (10% vs 5.2%, P < 0.001) but lower rates of haematuria (3.4% vs 5.5%, P < 0.001) and admission to the intensive care unit (0.7% vs 2.2%, P < 0.001) compared to non-HIFU procedures. Concomitant TURP was associated with higher transfusion (P < 0.001), haematuria (P < 0.001), sepsis (P = 0.001), and urinary retention rates (P = 0.03). Most perioperative complications were statistically significantly worse in patients undergoing FT compared to brachytherapy, while most perioperative complications were better after FT vs robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
In the largest epidemiological comparative study on the risk of complications of the most common FT for prostate cancer, we were able to show an overall low risk of perioperative complications.
比较前列腺癌最常见的局部治疗(FT)方式的围手术期并发症。
我们评估了2005年至2023年由联邦统计局研究数据中心提供的德国全国住院患者数据(GRAND)。我们比较了高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)、热疗、前列腺不可逆电穿孔、冷冻疗法、前列腺血管光动力疗法(VTP)和经尿道超声消融的围手术期结果,以及一般情况下HIFU与非HIFU治疗的结果。此外,我们评估了同期经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)对围手术期并发症的作用。最后,还将FT的并发症发生率与近距离放射治疗和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术进行了比较。
共有10544例患者接受了FT。大多数患者接受了HIFU(92%)。每年进行的FT病例数一直在稳步下降。最常见的并发症(9.6%)是尿路感染(HIFU:10%,热疗:6.2%,冷冻疗法:6.8%,VTP:3.9%)。所有病例中有3.6%观察到血尿。在多变量回归分析中,与非HIFU手术相比,HIFU与较高的尿路感染率(10%对5.2%,P<0.001)相关,但血尿率(3.4%对5.5%,P<0.001)和入住重症监护病房率(0.7%对2.2%,P<0.001)较低。同期TURP与较高的输血率(P<0.001)、血尿率(P<0.001)、脓毒症率(P=0.001)和尿潴留率(P=0.03)相关。与近距离放射治疗相比,接受FT的患者大多数围手术期并发症在统计学上明显更严重,而与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,FT后的大多数围手术期并发症情况更好。
在关于前列腺癌最常见FT并发症风险的最大规模流行病学比较研究中,我们能够证明围手术期并发症的总体风险较低。