Jhang Hoyol, Kim Soojung, Kim Kyuwon, Choi Sugy, Choe Seung-Ah
Department of Public Health, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 19;15(1):13582. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98247-x.
To synthesize the association between extreme ambient temperatures and the utilization of emergency healthcare services for substance use disorder (SUD). We performed a systematic literature review of original research published between 2000 and 2023 using five databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, WoS, and Scopus) for literature search, and assessed study quality and risk of bias. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the odds ratios (OR) for SUD-related emergency healthcare service utilization during periods of extremely high or low ambient temperatures. Of 709 articles screened, eight studies met the eligibility criteria. Six studies focused on emergency department (ED) visits, while two examined on-site emergency care utilization. The risk of SUD-related ED visits was significantly higher when the mean ambient temperature was in the top 5% of the temperature distribution range (pooled OR = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07, 1.15). Conversely, the risk of SUD-related ED visits was lower when the mean temperature was in the bottom 5% of the distribution (pooled OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.89, 0.99). Our review showed the extremely high ambient temperature is associated with higher risk of SUD-related emergency healthcare service utilization. However, given the high heterogeneity observed across studies, these results should be interpreted with caution. Differences in study design, population characteristics, geographic region, and substance type may have contributed to this heterogeneity. Despite these differences, this finding highlights the importance of considering environmental factors in the management and prevention of SUD-related health issues.
综合极端环境温度与物质使用障碍(SUD)紧急医疗服务利用之间的关联。我们对2000年至2023年发表的原始研究进行了系统的文献综述,使用五个数据库(PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、WoS和Scopus)进行文献检索,并评估研究质量和偏倚风险。进行随机效应荟萃分析以计算在极端高温或低温时期与SUD相关的紧急医疗服务利用的优势比(OR)。在筛选的709篇文章中,八项研究符合纳入标准。六项研究关注急诊科就诊情况,两项研究考察现场紧急护理利用情况。当平均环境温度处于温度分布范围的前5%时,与SUD相关的急诊科就诊风险显著更高(合并OR = 1.11,95%置信区间[CI]:1.07,1.15)。相反,当平均温度处于分布的后5%时,与SUD相关的急诊科就诊风险较低(合并OR = 0.94,95% CI:0.89,0.99)。我们的综述表明,极端高环境温度与SUD相关紧急医疗服务利用的较高风险相关。然而,鉴于各研究间观察到较高的异质性,这些结果应谨慎解释。研究设计、人群特征、地理区域和物质类型的差异可能导致了这种异质性。尽管存在这些差异,这一发现凸显了在管理和预防与SUD相关的健康问题时考虑环境因素的重要性。