Zhou Jingwen, Qin Si, Cui Rui, Chen Yao, Wang Yimin, Liu Guangjian
Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Int J Hyperthermia. 2025 Dec;42(1):2488128. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2025.2488128. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
To investigate the effectiveness and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) in patients with 1-5 colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) those with 6-9 CRLM.
Data from patients with 1-9 CRLM, who underwent ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous MWA between January 2018 and May 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) at a ratio of 1:2 was used to balance potential bias between the groups.
Data from 264 patients were included in the analysis. After PSM, there were 43 and 75 patients in the CRLM >5 and ≤5 groups, respectively. Even with higher tumor burden and technical difficulty, there was no statistical difference in the local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival (LTPFS) between the groups ( > 0.05). Patients with an ablation margin (AM) ≤5 mm exhibited a significantly higher rate of LTP than those with AM >5 mm in both groups( < 0.05). Patients with 6-9 CRLM experienced a higher incidence of intrahepatic recurrence (iHR) ( = 0.041) and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) at any site ( < 0.05). CRLM > 5 is an independent risk factor for poor PFS ( = 0.008). The minor complication rate was lower in the CRLM ≤ 5 group ( < 0.05) and the major complication rate showed no difference ( > 0.05).
When the number of CRLM was limited to 9, single-session MWA was feasible and safe for radical local treatment. An AM >5 mm was critical for local tumor control. Compared with patients with 1-5 CRLM, those with 6-9 CRLM experienced inferior PFS at any site, which mainly lies in more iHR.
探讨微波消融(MWA)治疗1 - 5枚结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者及6 - 9枚CRLM患者的有效性和安全性。
回顾性分析2018年1月至2023年5月期间接受超声(US)引导下经皮MWA治疗的1 - 9枚CRLM患者的数据。采用1:2的倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡组间潜在偏差。
264例患者的数据纳入分析。PSM后,CRLM>5枚组和≤5枚组分别有43例和75例患者。即使肿瘤负荷更高且技术难度更大,两组间无局部肿瘤进展(LTP)无进展生存期(LTPFS)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组中消融边缘(AM)≤5 mm的患者LTP发生率均显著高于AM>5 mm的患者(P<0.05)。6 - 9枚CRLM患者肝内复发(iHR)发生率更高(P = 0.041),任何部位的无进展生存期(PFS)更短(P<0.05)。CRLM>5枚是PFS不佳的独立危险因素(P = 0.008)。CRLM≤5枚组的轻微并发症发生率较低(P<0.05),严重并发症发生率无差异(P>0.05)。
当CRLM数量限制在9枚以内时,单次MWA用于根治性局部治疗是可行且安全的。AM>5 mm对局部肿瘤控制至关重要。与1 - 5枚CRLM患者相比,6 - 9枚CRLM患者任何部位的PFS较差,主要在于更多的iHR。