Suppr超能文献

白内障手术前对Fuchs内皮性角膜营养不良患者的断层扫描参数评估及亚临床水肿检测

Assessment of tomographic parameters and detection of subclinical edema in Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy pre-cataract surgery.

作者信息

Alves-Ambrósio João, Miranda Vítor, Aguiar Catarina Pestana, Chibante-Pedro João, Almeida Inês

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Unidade Local de Saúde Entre Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira 4520-211, Portugal.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 18;18(4):590-597. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.04.04. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

AIM

To assess tomographic changes and subclinical edema detection in Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) through Scheimpflug tomography in a group of phakic patients contemplating cataract surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 30 phakic eyes from patients diagnosed with FECD but without clinical edema, and 59 phakic eyes from a control group without corneal alterations. Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations were conducted, including slit-lamp biomicroscopy, corneal specular microscopy (CSM), and Scheimpflug tomography.

RESULTS

The study encompassed 30 phakic eyes with FECD (mean age 59.8±13.1y) and 59 control eyes (mean age 61.3±7.7y). The best-corrected visual acuity was higher in the control group compared to the FECD group [0 (0, 0.08) 0.05 (0, 0.15) logMAR; =0.042]. CSM revealed significant differences between the FECD and control groups in several parameters: number of analyzed cells (26±13 135±42, <0.001), cell density (2049±376 2479±225 cells/mm, <0.001), mean cell area [463 (434, 544) 397 (383, 431) µm; <0.001], coefficient of variation (54.8%±18.7% 41.0%±7.2%, <0.001), and hexagonal cells [0 (0, 47%) 47% (40%, 53%), <0.001]. Although often used as a clinical parameter for detecting edema, central corneal thickness measured by CSM showed no significant difference between the FECD and control groups (530±57 546±30 µm, =0.179). Significant differences were noted in various Pentacam measurements between the groups. Specifically, parameters like loss of parallel isopachs (13 0 eyes, <0.001), displacement of the thinnest point (11 0 eyes, <0.001), posterior focal depression (25 7 eyes, <0.001), and increased light scatter [21.4 (17.6; 23.9) 18.0 (16.8, 21.8), =0.01] were significantly more prevalent in FECD eyes, reflecting the presence of subclinical edema and loss of corneal transparency.

CONCLUSION

Scheimpflug tomography allows for an objective assessment of FECD, offering the capability to detect subclinical edema at an early stage, monitor disease progression, and serve as a predictor of corneal decompensation following cataract surgery.

摘要

目的

通过Scheimpflug断层扫描评估一组考虑白内障手术的有晶状体眼患者的Fuchs内皮性角膜营养不良(FECD)的断层变化及亚临床水肿检测情况。

方法

对30只诊断为FECD但无临床水肿的有晶状体眼患者以及59只无角膜病变的对照组有晶状体眼进行回顾性研究。进行了全面的眼科检查,包括裂隙灯生物显微镜检查、角膜内皮显微镜检查(CSM)和Scheimpflug断层扫描。

结果

该研究纳入了30只患有FECD的有晶状体眼(平均年龄59.8±13.1岁)和59只对照眼(平均年龄61.3±7.7岁)。对照组的最佳矫正视力高于FECD组[0(0,0.08) 0.05(0,0.15)logMAR;P =0.042]。CSM显示FECD组和对照组在几个参数上存在显著差异:分析细胞数量(26±13 135±42,P<0.001)、细胞密度(2049±376 2479±225个细胞/mm,P<0.001)、平均细胞面积[463(434,544) 397(383,431)µm;P<0.001]、变异系数(54.8%±18.7% 41.0%±7.2%,P<0.001)和六边形细胞[0(0,47%) 47%(40%,53%),P<0.001]。尽管CSM测量的中央角膜厚度常被用作检测水肿的临床参数,但FECD组和对照组之间无显著差异(530±57 546±30 µm,P =0.179)。两组之间在Pentacam的各种测量中存在显著差异。具体而言,像等厚线平行度丧失(13 0只眼,P<0.001)、最薄点移位(11 0只眼,P<0.001)、后焦凹陷(25 7只眼,P<0.001)和光散射增加[21.4(17.6;23.9) 18.0(16.8,21.8),P =0.01]等参数在FECD眼中明显更常见,反映了亚临床水肿的存在和角膜透明度的丧失。

结论

Scheimpflug断层扫描能够客观评估FECD,具备早期检测亚临床水肿、监测疾病进展以及作为白内障手术后角膜失代偿预测指标的能力。

相似文献

1
Assessment of tomographic parameters and detection of subclinical edema in Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy pre-cataract surgery.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 18;18(4):590-597. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.04.04. eCollection 2025.
4
Visual Function in Pseudophakic Eyes with Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul;239:98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.01.016. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
5
Scheimpflug Versus Optical Coherence Tomography to Detect Subclinical Corneal Edema in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.
Cornea. 2022 Nov 1;41(11):1378-1385. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002925. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
7
Scheimpflug Tomography as a Predictor of Corneal Edema After Phacoemulsification in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 19;18:2303-2311. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S474788. eCollection 2024.
8
Anterior Corneal High-order Aberrations in Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy Classified by Scheimpflug Tomography.
Optom Vis Sci. 2023 Feb 1;100(2):151-157. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001981. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
9
Corneal High-Order Aberrations and Backscatter in Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.
Ophthalmology. 2015 Aug;122(8):1645-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
10
The outcomes of postoperative eye patching after cataract surgery in patients with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan;34(1):119-125. doi: 10.1177/11206721231172808. Epub 2023 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Corneal Backscatter, Pachymetric Indices, and Ectasia Indices for the Assessment of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.
Cornea. 2025 Apr 1;44(4):427-434. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003577. Epub 2024 May 28.
2
Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: an updated review.
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 12;44(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-02994-1.
3
Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Criteria and Severity Classification for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.
Cornea. 2023 Dec 1;42(12):1590-1600. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003343. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
7
Detecting Subclinical Corneal Edema Using Corneal Thickness Mapping in Patients Presenting Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;246:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.09.014. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
9
Visual Function in Pseudophakic Eyes with Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul;239:98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.01.016. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验