Zhao Yun, Tan Hwee Leong, Chua Darren Weiquan, Goh Brian Kim Poh, Koh Ye Xin
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Gland Surg. 2025 Mar 31;14(3):529-542. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-421. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis, particularly for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has emerged as a promising strategy to improve resectability and survival outcomes in LAPC. This umbrella review aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the effectiveness of NAT and surgical interventions in LAPC, focusing on resection and R0 resection rates and overall survival (OS).
This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024565454). A comprehensive literature search was conducted in June 2024 across four databases. Studies reporting on NAT and/or surgery in LAPC were selected, and the methodological quality of each meta-analysis was assessed using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed comparing FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel as NAT regimens.
Nine systematic reviews with meta-analyses published between 2014 and 2023 were included. They covered a variety of treatment strategies, including NAT followed by resection, induction therapy comparing FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, and different surgical techniques. FOLFIRINOX demonstrated significantly higher R0 resection rates [risk ratio (RR): 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60-0.97, P<0.05] and improved OS compared to gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel [hazard ratio (HR): 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46-0.99, P<0.05]. Surgical resection following NAT was associated with significantly better survival outcomes than induction therapy alone or palliative treatments. The CEA revealed that FOLFIRINOX, despite its higher cost, yielded an incremental OS benefit of 5.19 months and maintained a 60-63% probability of being cost-effective within a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000 per additional month of OS gained.
This review highlights the superior efficacy of FOLFIRINOX as a NAT regimen for LAPC, particularly in increasing resectability and R0 resection rates. Combining NAT with surgery offers significant survival benefits, making this strategy a standard of care for eligible LAPC patients.
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是一种侵袭性恶性肿瘤,预后较差,尤其是局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)患者。新辅助治疗(NAT)已成为一种有前景的策略,可提高LAPC的可切除性和生存结局。本伞状综述旨在综合关于NAT和手术干预在LAPC中的有效性的现有证据,重点关注切除率、R0切除率和总生存期(OS)。
本研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42024565454)登记。2024年6月在四个数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。选择了报告LAPC中NAT和/或手术的研究,并使用系统评价质量评估工具2(AMSTAR-2)评估每个荟萃分析的方法学质量。进行了成本效益分析(CEA),比较了FOLFIRINOX(亚叶酸钙、氟尿嘧啶、伊立替康和奥沙利铂)和吉西他滨/纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇作为NAT方案的效果。
纳入了9项2014年至2023年间发表的带有荟萃分析的系统评价。它们涵盖了多种治疗策略,包括NAT后切除、比较FOLFIRINOX与吉西他滨/纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇的诱导治疗以及不同的手术技术。与吉西他滨/纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇相比,FOLFIRINOX显示出显著更高的R0切除率[风险比(RR):0.77,95%置信区间(CI):0.60-0.97,P<0.05],并改善了OS[风险比(HR):0.68,95%CI:0.46-0.99,P<0.05]。NAT后的手术切除与单独的诱导治疗或姑息治疗相比,生存结局显著更好。CEA显示,FOLFIRINOX尽管成本较高,但每增加一个月的OS可带来5.19个月的增量OS获益,并且在每增加一个月的OS愿意支付(WTP)阈值为150,000美元的情况下,具有成本效益的概率保持在60%-63%。
本综述强调了FOLFIRINOX作为LAPC的NAT方案的卓越疗效,特别是在提高可切除性和R0切除率方面。将NAT与手术相结合可带来显著的生存益处,使该策略成为符合条件的LAPC患者的标准治疗方案。