Holt-Kedde Iris L, Sadok Nadia, Krabbe-Timmerman Irene S, de Bock Geertruida H, Sidorenkov Grigory, Werker Paul M N
Department of Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Breast Care (Basel). 2025 Apr;20(2):95-110. doi: 10.1159/000543677. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
Quality of life (QoL) following autologous breast reconstruction has been found to be higher compared to alloplastic breast reconstruction. However, evaluating QoL is complex as it is influenced by various factors, including patient characteristics and treatment types. Previous studies comparing QoL between reconstruction techniques have not sufficiently addressed baseline differences between patient groups, some of which contribute to indication bias. Using an alternative approach to identify the confounders, this study aimed to evaluate which factors affect the patient satisfaction and QoL after alloplastic or autologous reconstruction, with follow-up extending up to 3 years post-surgery.
QoL and satisfaction were measured using the Breast-Q preoperatively and after breast reconstruction (post-BR) at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years. General and mental health were measured using the SF-36 and the HADS. A generalized linear mixed model was utilized to assess which factors confound the relationship between reconstruction technique and Breast-Q scores.
Factors contributing to the disparity in Breast-Q scores between autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction varied across Breast-Q subscales. Autologous breast reconstruction patients consistently reported higher "Satisfaction with Breasts" and "Physical Well-being," while the minimal important differences in "Psychosocial" and "Sexual Well-being" were lost after adjustment for confounding factors.
This study confirms that even when adjusted for confounders, scores on two QoL subscales autologous breast reconstruction patients score significantly higher over time. Although autologous reconstruction remained superior regarding "Satisfaction with Breasts," scores decreased in autologous reconstruction patients when they were depressed at baseline, underwent radiotherapy, had a history of breast cancer, or faced major complications.
与异体乳房重建相比,自体乳房重建后的生活质量(QoL)更高。然而,评估生活质量很复杂,因为它受多种因素影响,包括患者特征和治疗类型。以往比较不同重建技术生活质量的研究没有充分考虑患者组之间的基线差异,其中一些差异导致了指征偏倚。本研究采用另一种方法来识别混杂因素,旨在评估哪些因素会影响异体或自体重建后患者的满意度和生活质量,随访期长达术后3年。
在术前、乳房重建后(BR后)6周、6个月、1年和3年使用Breast-Q量表测量生活质量和满意度。使用SF-36和HADS量表测量总体健康和心理健康状况。采用广义线性混合模型评估哪些因素会混淆重建技术与Breast-Q评分之间的关系。
自体和异体乳房重建在Breast-Q评分上存在差异的因素因Breast-Q分量表而异。自体乳房重建患者始终报告较高的“对乳房的满意度”和“身体健康”,而在对混杂因素进行调整后,“心理社会”和“性健康”方面的最小重要差异消失。
本研究证实,即使对混杂因素进行了调整,随着时间的推移,自体乳房重建患者在两个生活质量分量表上的得分仍显著更高。尽管自体重建在“对乳房的满意度”方面仍然更具优势,但当自体重建患者基线时情绪低落、接受放疗、有乳腺癌病史或面临重大并发症时,其得分会下降。