Yamagishi Azusa, Kitamura Yuta, Baba Takayuki
Ophthalmology, Chiba University, Chiba, JPN.
Cureus. 2025 Mar 22;17(3):e80979. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80979. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Purpose This study aimed to compare the one-year postoperative outcomes of cataract surgery combined with the iStent inject W trabecular micro-bypass stent (iStent IW) implantation and cataract surgery combined with microhook trabeculotomy (μLOT) in a real-world clinical setting, before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Methods This retrospective comparative chart review included 41 eyes in the iStent IW group and 72 in the μLOT group. The primary outcomes assessed were postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and the number of glaucoma medications. Initially, we compared baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes between both groups before PSM. Then, PSM was performed to minimize baseline differences in glaucoma type, preoperative IOP, and the number of glaucoma medications, enabling a more accurate comparison of the IOP-lowering effects of both procedures. Results In the unadjusted analysis, the iStent IW group had a lower baseline IOP (14.5 ± 3.3 mmHg) than the μLOT group (19.3 ± 4.9 mmHg, p < 0.0001), as well as fewer medications (3.6 ± 1.3 vs. 4.8 ± 1.5, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the iStent IW group primarily comprised patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma, whereas the μLOT group included patients with a wider variety of glaucoma types. At 12 months, IOP was comparable between the iStent IW group (12.7 ± 2.8 mmHg) and the μLOT group (14.0 ± 4.1 mmHg; p = 0.2883), although the number of medications remained lower in the iStent IW group (2.2 ± 1.5 vs. 3.3 ± 1.7; p = 0.0299). After PSM, no significant differences in IOP or medications were observed. Layered hyphema occurred more frequently in the μLOT group. Conclusion Both procedures had comparable IOP reduction; however, the μLOT group had more postoperative layered hyphema and required more medications in the unadjusted analysis.
目的 本研究旨在比较在真实临床环境中,倾向评分匹配(PSM)前后,白内障手术联合iStent inject W小梁微旁路支架(iStent IW)植入与白内障手术联合微钩小梁切开术(μLOT)的术后一年结局。方法 这项回顾性比较图表审查纳入了iStent IW组的41只眼和μLOT组的72只眼。评估的主要结局为术后眼压(IOP)和青光眼药物使用数量。最初,我们比较了PSM前两组的基线特征和手术结局。然后,进行PSM以最小化青光眼类型、术前IOP和青光眼药物使用数量的基线差异,从而更准确地比较两种手术的降眼压效果。结果 在未调整分析中,iStent IW组的基线IOP(14.5±3.3 mmHg)低于μLOT组(19.3±4.9 mmHg,p<0.0001),且药物使用数量也更少(3.6±1.3对4.8±1.5,p<0.0001)。此外,iStent IW组主要包括原发性开角型青光眼和正常眼压性青光眼患者,而μLOT组包括更多类型青光眼的患者。在12个月时,iStent IW组(12.7±2.8 mmHg)和μLOT组(14.0±4.1 mmHg;p = 0.2883)的IOP相当,尽管iStent IW组的药物使用数量仍然较少(2.2±1.5对3.3±1.7;p = 0.0299)。PSM后,IOP或药物使用方面未观察到显著差异。分层前房积血在μLOT组中更频繁发生。结论 两种手术的降眼压效果相当;然而,在未调整分析中,μLOT组术后分层前房积血更多,且需要更多药物。