LeMasters Katherine, Nall Samantha, Jurecka Cole, Craft Betsy, Christine Paul, Binswanger Ingrid, Barocas Joshua
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA.
Colorado Drug Policy Coalition, Denver, USA.
Health Justice. 2025 Apr 22;13(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40352-025-00334-8.
In response to the U.S. overdose crisis, many states have increased criminal penalties for drug possession, particularly fentanyl. This study sought to qualitatively explore diverse community perspectives on increasing criminal legal penalties in Colorado for fentanyl possession (House Bill 22-1326) and the broader role of the criminal legal system in addressing substance use and overdose prevention. We conducted 31 semi-structured interviews in 2023 with community leaders directly working with people who use drugs, individuals with lived experience with drug use and the criminal legal system, and law enforcement throughout Colorado. Interviewees were asked about the perceived impact of House Bill 22-1326 on their communities and agencies. After interviews were complete, we created templated summaries and matrix analyses to conduct rapid qualitative analysis, an action-oriented approach to qualitative data analysis.
Respondents included peer support specialists (n = 7), policymakers (n = 6), community behavioral health/harm reduction providers (n = 6), criminal legal program staff (n = 8), and law enforcement (n = 4), with nine participants from rural counties. Analysis revealed that participants found increasing criminal penalties for fentanyl possession to be misguided: "And the felony [of HB-1326] is such a good example of a policy being led by feelings rather than evidence." This was in the context of participants' divergent views on police as conduits to treatment and punishment and perceiving jail as an (in)appropriate response for substance use disorder treatment.
All participants supported policy efforts to prevent fatal fentanyl overdoses, yet, most thought that increased use of police and incarceration as avenues to prevent overdose was misguided. This study highlights a diverse array of community perspectives that can inform policy decisions concerning criminal penalties for fentanyl possession and distribution and can inform policies that affect people who use drugs broadly.
为应对美国的药物过量危机,许多州加大了对持有毒品,尤其是芬太尼的刑事处罚力度。本研究旨在定性探索科罗拉多州各界对提高持有芬太尼刑事处罚(众议院法案22 - 1326)的不同看法,以及刑事法律体系在解决药物使用和预防药物过量方面的更广泛作用。2023年,我们对科罗拉多州直接与吸毒者打交道的社区领袖、有吸毒和刑事法律体系亲身经历的个人以及执法人员进行了31次半结构化访谈。受访者被问及众议院法案22 - 1326对其社区和机构的感知影响。访谈结束后,我们创建了模板化总结和矩阵分析以进行快速定性分析,这是一种面向行动的定性数据分析方法。
受访者包括同伴支持专家(n = 7)、政策制定者(n = 6)、社区行为健康/减少伤害服务提供者(n = 6)、刑事法律项目工作人员(n = 8)和执法人员(n = 4),其中9名参与者来自农村县。分析表明,参与者认为提高持有芬太尼的刑事处罚是错误的:“众议院法案1326中的重罪就是一个由情感而非证据主导的政策的典型例子。”这是在参与者对警察作为治疗和惩罚渠道存在不同看法,以及认为监狱是(不)适合治疗物质使用障碍的场所的背景下出现的。
所有参与者都支持预防致命芬太尼过量的政策努力,但大多数人认为增加警察和监禁作为预防过量的途径是错误的。本研究突出了一系列不同的社区观点,这些观点可为有关持有和分销芬太尼刑事处罚的政策决策提供参考,并可为广泛影响吸毒者的政策提供参考。