Ikesu Ryo, Gotanda Hiroshi, Russell Tara A, Maggard-Gibbons Melinda, Russell Marcia McGory, Yoshida Ryu, Li Ruixin, Klomhaus Alexandra, de Virgilio Christian, Tsugawa Yusuke
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
JAMA Surg. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.0866.
Evidence suggests that physician gender and patient-physician gender concordance have the potential to improve patient outcomes, especially for female patients. However, whether long-term outcomes differ by surgeon gender and patient-surgeon gender concordance has not been studied in the US.
To compare long-term postoperative outcomes by surgeon gender and patient-surgeon gender concordance.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted based on 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2016 through 2019. Data analysis was performed between October 17, 2023, and January 28, 2025. The study took place at acute care hospitals in the US. Participants included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 to 99 years who underwent 1 of 14 elective or emergent surgeries.
Surgeon gender and patient-surgeon gender concordance.
Ninety-day and 1-year postoperative mortality, readmission, and complication rates were compared by surgeon gender and patient-surgeon gender concordance. The study team adjusted for patient and surgeon characteristics and hospital fixed effects, effectively comparing patients within the same hospital.
Among 2 288 279 patients who underwent surgery, 129 528 were operated on by female surgeons (5.7%) and 2 158 751 were by male surgeons (94.3%). Patients treated by female surgeons experienced a lower long-term mortality rate compared with those treated by male surgeons (adjusted 90-day mortality rates, 2.6% for female surgeons vs 3.0% for male surgeons; adjusted risk difference [aRD], -0.3 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, -0.5 pp to -0.2 pp; P < .001), similarly for both female and male patients. For female patients, the patient-surgeon gender concordance was associated with lower long-term readmission (adjusted 90-day readmission rates, 7.3% vs 7.7%; aRD, -0.4 pp; 95% CI, -0.7 pp to -0.2 pp; P = .001) and complication rates (adjusted 90-day complication rates, 12.2% vs 12.8%; aRD, -0.5 pp; 95% CI, -0.9 pp to -0.2 pp; P = .005). For male patients, long-term readmission and complication rates did not differ between patients treated by female vs male surgeons. Similar patterns were found between 90-day and 1-year patient outcomes.
In this study, both female and male patients treated by female surgeons experienced lower long-term postoperative mortality rates compared with those treated by male surgeons. Patient-surgeon gender concordance was associated with lower long-term readmission and complication rates for female patients, but not for male patients. These patterns were observed only for elective procedures and may not be generalizable to other populations, such as younger patients.
有证据表明,医生性别以及患者与医生的性别一致性有可能改善患者的治疗效果,尤其是对女性患者而言。然而,在美国,长期治疗效果是否因外科医生性别以及患者与外科医生的性别一致性而有所不同尚未得到研究。
比较外科医生性别以及患者与外科医生的性别一致性对术后长期治疗效果的影响。
设计、背景和参与者:基于2016年至2019年100%的医疗保险按服务收费索赔数据进行了一项基于人群的横断面研究。数据分析于2023年10月17日至2025年1月28日进行。该研究在美国的急症护理医院开展。参与者包括年龄在65岁至99岁之间、接受了14种择期或急诊手术之一的医疗保险按服务收费受益人。
外科医生性别以及患者与外科医生的性别一致性。
按外科医生性别以及患者与外科医生的性别一致性比较术后90天和1年的死亡率、再入院率和并发症发生率。研究团队对患者和外科医生的特征以及医院固定效应进行了调整,有效地比较了同一医院内的患者。
在接受手术的2288279名患者中,129528名由女外科医生进行手术(5.7%),2158751名由男外科医生进行手术(94.3%)。与男外科医生治疗的患者相比,女外科医生治疗的患者长期死亡率较低(调整后的90天死亡率,女外科医生为2.6%,男外科医生为3.0%;调整后的风险差异[aRD],-0.3个百分点[pp];95%置信区间,-0.5 pp至-0.2 pp;P < .001),女性患者和男性患者均如此。对于女性患者,患者与外科医生的性别一致性与较低的长期再入院率(调整后的90天再入院率,7.3%对7.7%;aRD,-0.4 pp;95%置信区间,-0.7 pp至-0.2 pp;P = .001)和并发症发生率(调整后的90天并发症发生率,12.2%对12.8%;aRD,-0.5 pp;95%置信区间,-0.9 pp至-0.2 pp;P = .005)相关。对于男性患者,女外科医生和男外科医生治疗的患者长期再入院率和并发症发生率没有差异。在90天和1年的患者治疗效果之间发现了类似的模式。
在本研究中,与男外科医生治疗的患者相比,女外科医生治疗的女性患者和男性患者术后长期死亡率均较低。患者与外科医生的性别一致性与女性患者较低的长期再入院率和并发症发生率相关,但与男性患者无关。这些模式仅在择期手术中观察到,可能不适用于其他人群,如年轻患者。