Suppr超能文献

社区层面的因素是否在艾滋病毒自我检测的接受度、与服务的联系以及与艾滋病毒相关的结果中发挥作用?一项关于津巴布韦农村社区主导的艾滋病毒自我检测的混合方法研究。

Do community-level factors play a role in HIV self-testing uptake, linkage to services and HIV-related outcomes? A mixed methods study of community-led HIV self-testing in rural Zimbabwe.

作者信息

Tumushime Mary K, Ruhode Nancy, Neuman Melissa, Watadzaushe Constancia, Mutseta Miriam, Taegtmeyer Miriam, Johnson Cheryl C, Hatzold Karin, Corbett Elizabeth L, Cowan Frances M, Sibanda Euphemia L

机构信息

Centre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR) Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 24;5(4):e0003196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003196. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Community-led interventions, where communities plan and lead implementation, are increasingly being adopted within public health programmes. We explore factors associated with successful community-led distribution of HIV self-test (HIVST) kits to guide future service delivery. Twenty rural communities were supported to distribute HIVST kits for 1-month between January and September 2019. Social science researchers observed communities during planning and HIVST distribution, documenting findings in a standard observation template. Three months post-intervention, a population-based survey measured self-reported new HIV diagnosis, HIVST uptake, linkage to post-test services; and collected blood samples for viral load testing. The survey also included questions related to community cohesion; respondents' communities were grouped into low/medium/high based on community cohesion scores. We used mixed effect logistic regression to assess how outcomes differed based on community cohesion scores. In total, 27,812 kits were distributed by 348 distributors. Two HIVST distribution models were implemented: door-to-door only or at community venues/events. Of 5,683 participants surveyed, 1,831 (32.2%) received kits and 1,229 (67.1%) reported self-testing; overall HIVST uptake was 1,229/5,683 (21.6%). New HIV diagnosis increased with community cohesion, from 32/1,770 (1.8%) in the low-cohesion group to 40/1,871 (2.1%) in the medium-cohesion group, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.94 (1.41-6.12, p = 0.004) and 66/2,042 (3.2%) in the high-cohesion group, aOR 7.20 (2.31-22.50, p = 0.001). Other outcomes did not differ by extent of cohesion. Our findings demonstrate the more cohesive communities are, the more effective they may be at distributing HIVST kits and identifying people with undiagnosed HIV. Efforts to increase community cohesion should be considered as part of public health programmes and for planning and scaling-up HIVST implementation in communities.

摘要

由社区主导干预措施,即由社区规划并牵头实施,在公共卫生项目中越来越多地被采用。我们探究与成功进行社区主导的艾滋病毒自我检测(HIVST)试剂盒分发相关的因素,以指导未来的服务提供。在2019年1月至9月期间,我们支持了20个农村社区分发HIVST试剂盒,为期1个月。社会科学研究人员在规划和HIVST分发期间对社区进行了观察,并将观察结果记录在标准观察模板中。干预三个月后,一项基于人群的调查测量了自我报告的新艾滋病毒诊断情况、HIVST的使用情况、与检测后服务的联系;并采集血样进行病毒载量检测。该调查还包括与社区凝聚力相关的问题;根据社区凝聚力得分,将受访者所在社区分为低/中/高三个类别。我们使用混合效应逻辑回归来评估结果如何因社区凝聚力得分而异。共有348名分发人员分发了27,812个试剂盒。实施了两种HIVST分发模式:仅挨家挨户分发或在社区场所/活动中分发。在接受调查的5,683名参与者中,1,831人(32.2%)收到了试剂盒,1,229人(67.1%)报告进行了自我检测;总体HIVST使用率为1,229/5,683(21.6%)。新的艾滋病毒诊断随着社区凝聚力的增强而增加,从低凝聚力组的32/1,770(1.8%)增加到中等凝聚力组的40/1,871(2.1%),调整后的优势比(aOR)为2.94(1.41 - 6.12,p = 0.004),高凝聚力组为66/2,042(3.2%),aOR为7.20(2.31 - 22.50,p =

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df03/12021296/7aed7720c027/pgph.0003196.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验