Nduwimana Marie-Joy, Liu Shan W, Goldberg Elizabeth M, Bellolio Fernanda, Mullan Aidan F, Wilson Renthony, Campbell Ronna L
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2025 Aug;13(8):2014-2024.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.04.023. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
Limited data exist on anaphylaxis characteristics and outcomes in older adults.
To compare triggers, presentation, management, and outcomes of anaphylaxis emergency department (ED) visits between older adults (≥65 y) and younger adults (18-64 y) in a prehospital setting and the ED.
This cohort study included ED visits among adults meeting anaphylaxis diagnostic criteria from April 2008 to December 2022. Visit characteristics and outcomes were analyzed by age group using χ analysis and multivariable logistic regression.
Among 1,422 patient visits, 212 (14.9%) involved older adults. Compared with younger adults, visits among older adults were more likely to involve anaphylaxis from medications (34.0% vs 21.3%; odds ratio [OR] 1.85; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.34-2.55) and intravenous contrast (13.2% vs 5.6%; OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.55-4.04). Older adult visits had increased odds of severe anaphylaxis (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.57; 95% CI 1.12-2.21), including endotracheal intubation (aOR 6.24; 95% CI 2.69-14.48) and admission to the hospital or intensive care unit (aOR 1.78; 95% CI 1.19-2.67). Older adult visits were also more likely to arrive via Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (56.1% vs 34.0%; OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.89-3.46), but less likely to receive EMS-administered epinephrine (26.0% vs 32.4%; aOR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27-0.77).
Visits among older adults had increased odds of anaphylaxis from medications and IV contrast, cardiovascular symptoms, and more severe outcomes, including intubation and intensive care unit admission. Improved EMS epinephrine administration and prehospital guidelines could enhance outcomes for older adults with anaphylaxis.
关于老年人过敏反应特征和结局的数据有限。
比较老年人(≥65岁)和年轻人(18 - 64岁)在院前环境和急诊科因过敏反应就诊时的触发因素、表现、处理及结局。
这项队列研究纳入了2008年4月至2022年12月期间符合过敏反应诊断标准的成人急诊科就诊病例。使用χ²分析和多变量逻辑回归按年龄组分析就诊特征和结局。
在1422例患者就诊中,212例(14.9%)涉及老年人。与年轻人相比,老年人就诊更有可能因药物(34.0%对21.3%;优势比[OR]1.85;95%置信区间[95%CI]1.34 - 2.55)和静脉造影剂(13.2%对5.6%;OR 2.50;95%CI 1.55 - 4.04)引发过敏反应。老年人就诊出现严重过敏反应的几率增加(调整后优势比[OR]1.57;95%CI 1.12 - 2.21),包括气管插管(调整后OR 6.24;95%CI 2.69 - 14.48)以及住院或入住重症监护病房(调整后OR 1.78;95%CI 1.19 - 2.67)。老年人就诊也更有可能通过紧急医疗服务(EMS)送达(56.1%对34.0%;OR 2.56;95%CI 1.89 - 3.46),但接受EMS给予肾上腺素治疗的可能性较小(26.0%对32.4%;调整后OR 0.46;95%CI 0.27 - 0.77)。
老年人就诊因药物和静脉造影剂引发过敏反应、出现心血管症状以及出现包括插管和入住重症监护病房在内的更严重结局的几率增加。改善EMS肾上腺素给药和院前指南可能会改善老年过敏反应患者的结局。