Anjiki Kensuke, Nakano Naoki, Kubo Seiji, Ishida Kazunari, Ikuta Kemmei, Tsubosaka Masanori, Kamenaga Tomoyuki, Kuroda Yuichi, Hayashi Shinya, Kuroda Ryosuke, Matsumoto Tomoyuki
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Anshin Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Apr 24;35(1):165. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04268-7.
In unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), the tibial component tends to be placed in a mildly varus position because of the expected improvement in stress distribution and load transfer across the tibia. With the spacer block technique in UKA, if a tibial osteotomy is performed in the varus position, the femoral component is placed in the valgus position. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of valgus positioning of the femoral component on the short-term postoperative clinical outcomes in fixed-bearing UKA using the spacer block technique.
We analyzed 77 knees of 70 patients who underwent fixed-bearing UKA using the spacer block technique for medial compartment osteoarthritis and spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. Patients were categorized based on femoral component alignment: the neutral group (-3° to + 3°, mean 0.5° ± 1.7° valgus) and the valgus group (> 3°, mean 5.7° ± 1.7° valgus). Postoperative outcomes, including the femorotibial angle (FTA), component sagittal alignment, knee range of motion, and 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS), were compared between the two groups.
No significant differences were found between the neutral and valgus groups regarding the postoperative FTA, component sagittal alignment, knee range of motion (neutral vs. valgus group; extension,°: - 1.9 ± 2.9 vs. - 1.6 ± 2.9; flexion,°: 133.0 ± 6.9 vs. 131.3 ± 7.9), or 2011 KSS (objective knee indicators: 95.0 ± 8.9 vs. 96.8 ± 3.5; functional activities: 78.9 ± 15.3 vs. 78.2 ± 12.9).
These findings support the safety of valgus positioning in fixed-bearing UKA, offering flexibility in component placement without compromising short-term clinical outcomes.
在单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)中,由于预期胫骨上的应力分布和负荷传递会得到改善,胫骨组件往往会被放置在轻度内翻位置。在UKA中采用间隔块技术时,如果在胫骨内翻位置进行截骨术,股骨组件则放置在外翻位置。因此,本研究旨在评估使用间隔块技术的固定平台UKA中股骨组件外翻定位对术后短期临床结果的影响。
我们分析了70例接受使用间隔块技术治疗内侧间室骨关节炎和膝关节自发性骨坏死的固定平台UKA患者的77个膝关节。根据股骨组件对线情况将患者分为两组:中立组(-3°至+3°,平均外翻0.5°±1.7°)和外翻组(>3°,平均外翻5.7°±1.7°)。比较两组术后的结果,包括股胫角(FTA)、组件矢状面排列、膝关节活动范围和2011年膝关节协会评分(KSS)。
中立组和外翻组在术后FTA、组件矢状面排列、膝关节活动范围(中立组与外翻组;伸展,°:-1.9±2.9对-1.6±2.9;屈曲,°:133.0±6.9对131.3±7.9)或2011年KSS(客观膝关节指标:95.0±8.9对96.8±3.5;功能活动:78.9±15.3对78.2±12.9)方面均未发现显著差异。
这些发现支持了固定平台UKA中外翻定位的安全性,在不影响短期临床结果的情况下,为组件放置提供了灵活性。