Murray Benjamin, Ghasemi Ali, Memon Ramiz, Yin Clark, Raphael James, Shaffer Gene
Naval Air Station, Pensacola, FL, USA.
Jefferson Health, Einstein Healthcare Network, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Foot Ankle Int. 2025 Jul;46(7):794-805. doi: 10.1177/10711007251329339. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
Arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair procedures generally involve either repair solely of the ATFL or repair of the ATFL with inferior extensor retinaculum (IER) reinforcement. Both techniques produce strong clinical outcomes; however, studies directly comparing ATFL repair techniques with and without IER reinforcement are limited. We hypothesize that patients receiving arthroscopic ATFL repair with IER reinforcement have superior clinical outcome scores.
A systematic review and meta-analysis per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was conducted. To assess the relationship of type of surgical procedure (repair of only the ATFL or repair of the ATFL plus IER reinforcement) to reported clinical outcomes based on the Karlsson and Peterson Scoring System for Ankle Function (KAFS), visual analog scale (VAS), and the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, we used the standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% CI of preoperative to postoperative scores as an effect size. A meta-regression analysis was conducted to identify the source of differences in the observed effect size between studies.
A total of 638 studies met the initial search criteria. The meta-analysis included 34 studies to compare clinical outcomes of arthroscopic ATFL repair. Arthroscopic ATFL repair both with and without IER reinforcement resulted in significantly improved preoperative to postoperative clinical outcome scores. Arthroscopic ATFL repair with IER reinforcement resulted in a significantly higher preoperative to postoperative SMD for KAFS ( = .091) and VAS ( = .065) scores compared to arthroscopic ATFL repair without IER reinforcement. There was no significant difference in the preoperative to postoperative SMD of AOFAS ( = .453) scores when comparing surgical procedures. ATFL repair with IER reinforcement had a significantly greater rate of superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) injury ( = .004).
Arthroscopic ATFL repair with IER reinforcement leads to improved clinical outcome scores but carries a higher risk of SPN injury compared to arthroscopic ATFL repair without IER reinforcement. Patients receiving either arthroscopic procedure should achieve excellent functional outcomes.
关节镜下距腓前韧带(ATFL)修复手术通常包括单纯修复ATFL或用下伸肌支持带(IER)加强修复ATFL。两种技术都能产生良好的临床效果;然而,直接比较有无IER加强的ATFL修复技术的研究有限。我们假设接受关节镜下IER加强修复ATFL的患者临床结局评分更高。
按照PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南进行系统评价和Meta分析。为了评估手术方式(仅修复ATFL或修复ATFL加IER加强)与基于卡尔森和彼得森踝关节功能评分系统(KAFS)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)评分所报告的临床结局之间的关系,我们将术前至术后评分的标准化均数差(SMD)及其95%置信区间作为效应量。进行Meta回归分析以确定研究间观察到的效应量差异的来源。
共有638项研究符合初始检索标准。Meta分析纳入了34项比较关节镜下ATFL修复临床结局的研究。关节镜下ATFL修复无论有无IER加强,术前至术后临床结局评分均显著改善。与未进行IER加强的关节镜下ATFL修复相比,进行IER加强的关节镜下ATFL修复在KAFS(SMD = 0.091)和VAS(SMD = 0.065)评分上术前至术后的SMD显著更高。比较手术方式时,AOFAS评分术前至术后的SMD无显著差异(SMD = 0.453)。IER加强修复ATFL时腓浅神经(SPN)损伤发生率显著更高(P = 0.004)。
与未进行IER加强的关节镜下ATFL修复相比,进行IER加强的关节镜下ATFL修复可提高临床结局评分,但SPN损伤风险更高。接受这两种关节镜手术的患者都应能获得良好的功能结局。