Samimi Sadeh Saghar, Moayer Babak, Natajmajd Masoomeh, Kianpour Parisa, Farhadi Kousha, Etezadi Mahgol, Rahimi Mojgan, Etezadi Farhad
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2025 Mar 18;102:100784. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2025.100784. eCollection 2025.
Pregnant women frequently have face and upper airway edema, which makes managing the airways during anesthesia difficult and increases the risk of mask breathing complications and intubation failure. This necessitates an investigation into the sensitivity of various airway tests in predicting difficult intubation.
To assess the accuracy of the thyromental height test (TMHT) in predicting difficult laryngoscopy in obstetric patients undergoing cesarean section and to compare its effectiveness with other airway assessment methods.
We included a cohort of obstetric patients, approved by the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, scheduled for elective cesarean sections. During laryngoscopy, preoperative evaluations of the airway were done. The primary aim was to determine the relationship between TMHT (the distance between mentum and the thyroid cartilage) and the Cormack-Lehane (which categories laryngoscopy view from fully observable vocal cords to nonvisible epiglottis) classification, which indicates the level of difficulty in laryngoscopy.
After eligibility assessment, 156 patients entered the study, of which 16 had Cormack-Lehane grades III and IV and were considered difficult laryngoscopy. The TMHT demonstrated a higher Matthews correlation coefficient (0.695), sensitivity (0.75), and specificity (0.96) compared with other tests, suggesting that TMHT has the potential to serve as a dependable predictor of challenging laryngoscopy.
The use of TMHT can improve patient outcomes and the preoperative evaluation process, making it a valuable tool for anesthesiologists managing obstetric patients. The TMHT could be considered a complementary tool to existing airway assessment methods, particularly in obstetric patients, due to its high predictive accuracy and ease of use.This study is registered at Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial (IRCT) under identifier code of IR.TUMS.SINAHOSPITAL.REC.1399.061.
孕妇常有面部和上呼吸道水肿,这使得麻醉期间气道管理困难,并增加面罩通气并发症和插管失败的风险。因此有必要研究各种气道检查对预测困难插管的敏感性。
评估颏甲距离试验(TMHT)在预测剖宫产产科患者喉镜检查困难方面的准确性,并将其有效性与其他气道评估方法进行比较。
我们纳入了一组经德黑兰医科大学伦理委员会批准、计划行择期剖宫产的产科患者。在喉镜检查期间,对气道进行术前评估。主要目的是确定颏甲距离试验(颏部与甲状软骨之间的距离)与科马克-莱汉内分级(该分级将喉镜视野从完全可见声带到看不见会厌进行分类)之间的关系,该分级表明喉镜检查的困难程度。
经过资格评估,156例患者进入研究,其中16例科马克-莱汉内分级为III级和IV级,被认为喉镜检查困难。与其他检查相比,颏甲距离试验显示出更高的马修斯相关系数(0.695)、敏感性(0.75)和特异性(0.96),这表明颏甲距离试验有可能作为困难喉镜检查的可靠预测指标。
使用颏甲距离试验可改善患者预后和术前评估过程,使其成为麻醉医生管理产科患者的有价值工具。由于颏甲距离试验具有较高的预测准确性且易于使用,可被视为现有气道评估方法的补充工具,尤其是在产科患者中。本研究已在伊朗临床试验注册中心(IRCT)注册,标识符代码为IR.TUMS.SINAHOSPITAL.REC.1399.061。