Suppr超能文献

早期非小细胞肺癌患者的真实世界治疗模式与结局

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients with Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

作者信息

Deem Jennifer D, Hepp Zsolt, Carlson Joshua J

机构信息

CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Pfizer Inc., New York, NY 10001, USA.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2025 Apr 19;32(4):239. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32040239.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Worldwide, about two million people are diagnosed with lung cancer each year, 85% of whom have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent progress in treating advanced/metastatic NSCLC with targeted therapies has shifted attention to early NSCLC (Stages I-IIIA) and perioperative (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) systemic therapies. However, our comprehension of how targeted therapeutics are incorporated into care and their impact on patient outcomes is just starting to unfold.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study used a US nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database spanning January 2019-March 2024 and aimed to describe (1) eNSCLC patient demographic and clinical characteristics, (2) real-world neoadjuvant and adjuvant use, and (3) patient outcomes.

RESULTS

The study population included 4841 Stage IB-IIIA NSCLC patients with a mean age of 70.9 ± 8.6 years. The majority (69.9%) received definitive treatment: surgery ( = 2280), definitive radiation ( = 320), or definitive chemoradiation ( = 783), while 30.1% ( = 1458) did not. Many definitive treatment patients received some perioperative systemic therapy (surgery: 52.6%, radiation: 52.2%, chemoradiation: 75.5%). Neoadjuvant use was limited in all groups (surgery: 8.2%, radiation: 6.1%, chemoradiation: 11.6%). Among the 54.6% receiving adjuvant, immune checkpoint inhibitors were the most common choice for definitive radiation (39.1%) and chemoradiation (73.7%) patients, while surgical patients predominantly received platinum-doublet therapy (37.0%). Surgical patient outcomes were similar across all groups, while definitive chemoradiation or radiation patients without systemic therapy had lower survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that although the majority of patients underwent some form of definitive treatment, adjuvant use was limited, and neoadjuvant use was rarely included in care. A crucial initial step in improving patient outcomes is to understand and address the underutilization of neoadjuvant/adjuvant systemic therapy for eNSCLC patients.

摘要

未标注

在全球范围内,每年约有200万人被诊断为肺癌,其中85%患有非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)。用靶向疗法治疗晚期/转移性NSCLC的最新进展已将注意力转向早期NSCLC(I-IIIA期)和围手术期(新辅助和辅助)全身治疗。然而,我们对靶向治疗如何纳入治疗以及它们对患者预后的影响的理解才刚刚开始显现。

方法

这项回顾性观察性研究使用了一个来自美国全国电子健康记录的去识别数据库,时间跨度为2019年1月至2024年3月,旨在描述(1)早期NSCLC患者的人口统计学和临床特征,(2)现实世界中新辅助和辅助治疗的使用情况,以及(3)患者的预后。

结果

研究人群包括4841例IB-IIIA期NSCLC患者,平均年龄为70.9±8.6岁。大多数患者(69.9%)接受了确定性治疗:手术(n = 2280)、确定性放疗(n = 320)或确定性放化疗(n = 783),而30.1%(n = 1458)未接受。许多接受确定性治疗的患者接受了一些围手术期全身治疗(手术:52.6%,放疗:52.2%,放化疗:75.5%)。新辅助治疗在所有组中使用有限(手术:8.2%,放疗:6.1%,放化疗:11.6%)。在接受辅助治疗的54.6%的患者中,免疫检查点抑制剂是接受确定性放疗(39.1%)和放化疗(73.7%)患者最常见的选择,而手术患者主要接受铂类双联疗法(37.0%)。所有组的手术患者预后相似,而未接受全身治疗的确定性放化疗或放疗患者生存率较低。

结论

在本研究中,我们发现尽管大多数患者接受了某种形式的确定性治疗,但辅助治疗的使用有限,新辅助治疗很少纳入治疗。改善患者预后的关键第一步是了解并解决早期NSCLC患者新辅助/辅助全身治疗使用不足的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验