Rossi Chiara, Simeoli Raffaele, Angelino Giulia, Cairoli Sara, Bracci Fiammetta, Knafelz Daniela, Romeo Erminia Francesca, Faraci Simona, Tarantino Giusyda, Mancini Alessandro, Vitale Alessia, Vici Carlo Dionisi, Manzoni Silvia Magni, De Angelis Paola, Goffredo Bianca Maria
Division of Metabolic Diseases and Hepatology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Digestive Endoscopy and Surgery Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Pharmaceutics. 2025 Mar 26;17(4):421. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17040421.
: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) mainly relies on the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). More recently, rapid assays have been developed and validated to reduce turnaround time (TAT). Here, we compared IFX and ADL concentrations measured with both ELISA and a new fluorescence-based lateral flow immunoassay (AFIAS). : In serum samples from pediatric patients, IFX and ADL drug levels, and total anti-IFX antibodies were measured using clinically validated ELISA kits (Immundiagnostik AG). Samples were further analyzed using a new rapid assay (AFIAS, Boditech Med Inc.) to measure drug levels and total anti-IFX antibodies. : Spearman's correlation coefficients (rho) were 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 0.99] for IFX ( < 0.001) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.90) for ADL ( < 0.001). Calculated % bias was -14.09 (95% Limits of agreement, LoA, -52.83 to 24.66) for IFX and 15.79 (LoA -37.14 to 68.73) for ADL. For the evaluation of total anti-IFX antibodies, we did not collect sufficient data to establish a statistically significant correlation between AFIAS and ELISA. The inter-rater agreement showed a "substantial" and a "moderate" agreement for IFX and ADL, respectively. : Our results show that the AFIAS assay has an accuracy and analytical performance comparable to that of the ELISA method used for TDM of IFX and ADL. Therefore, the introduction of this device into routine clinical practice could provide results more quickly and with similar accuracy as ELISA, allowing clinicians to rapidly formulate clinical decisions.
英夫利昔单抗(IFX)和阿达木单抗(ADL)的治疗药物监测(TDM)主要依赖于酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)。最近,已开发并验证了快速检测方法以缩短周转时间(TAT)。在此,我们比较了用ELISA和一种新的基于荧光的侧向流动免疫测定法(AFIAS)测量的IFX和ADL浓度。:在儿科患者的血清样本中,使用经过临床验证的ELISA试剂盒(Immundiagnostik AG)测量IFX和ADL药物水平以及总抗IFX抗体。使用一种新的快速检测方法(AFIAS,Boditech Med Inc.)对样本进行进一步分析,以测量药物水平和总抗IFX抗体。:IFX的Spearman相关系数(rho)为0.98 [95%置信区间(CI)0.97至0.99](<0.001),ADL的为0.83(95%CI 0.72至0.90)(<0.001)。IFX的计算偏差百分比为-14.09(95%一致性界限,LoA,-52.83至24.66),ADL的为15.79(LoA -37.14至68.73)。对于总抗IFX抗体的评估,我们没有收集到足够的数据来建立AFIAS与ELISA之间具有统计学意义的相关性。评分者间一致性分别显示IFX为“高度”一致,ADL为“中度”一致。:我们的结果表明,AFIAS检测的准确性和分析性能与用于IFX和ADL TDM的ELISA方法相当。因此,将该设备引入常规临床实践可以更快地提供结果,且准确性与ELISA相似,使临床医生能够迅速做出临床决策。