• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

万古霉素替代头孢唑林用于全膝关节置换术中假体周围关节感染预防的经济负担。

The financial burden of vancomycin as an alternative to cefazolin for periprosthetic joint infection prophylaxis in total knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Taylor Iv Walter L, Bergstein Victoria, Weinblatt Aaron, Long William J

机构信息

Department of Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Apr 26;145(1):272. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05879-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-025-05879-9
PMID:40285876
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Vancomycin is less effective than cefazolin at preventing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the costs associated with vancomycin and cefazolin TKA prophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used previously published PJI rates associated with vancomycin and cefazolin prophylaxis to create a model that captured the costs associated with these two options for antibiotic prophylaxis prior to TKA. The model included the cost of the antibiotic used, the cost of staff salaries in both preoperative holding and operating rooms, and the cost of a 2-stage septic TKA revision. National projections were used to account for future TKA volume.

RESULTS

The average per-patient cost associated with cefazolin TKA PJI prophylaxis was $469.79, accounting for a PJI rate of 0.50%. The average per-patient cost associated with vancomycin TKA PJI prophylaxis was $ $1,640.22, accounting for a 1.00% PJI rate. This cost discrepancy could amount to nearly $4.0 billion by 2040 given projections of TKA incidence.

CONCLUSION

The per-patient cost associated with vancomycin TKA prophylaxis is 250% higher than cefazolin. This difference is due to the increased cost of primary treatment, labor costs associated with prolonged infusion time, and differential PJI rates. In an era of value-based care, cefazolin has been consistently demonstrated as the gold standard for TKA PJI prophylaxis and is associated with significant cost advantages.

摘要

引言

在全膝关节置换术(TKA)后预防假体周围关节感染(PJI)方面,万古霉素的效果不如头孢唑林。本研究的目的是量化并比较与万古霉素和头孢唑林用于TKA预防相关的成本。

材料与方法

我们使用先前发表的与万古霉素和头孢唑林预防相关的PJI发生率来创建一个模型,该模型涵盖了TKA术前这两种抗生素预防方案的相关成本。该模型包括所用抗生素的成本、术前等待室和手术室的工作人员薪资成本,以及二期感染性TKA翻修的成本。使用全国预测数据来考虑未来TKA的数量。

结果

与头孢唑林用于TKA预防PJI相关的人均成本为469.79美元,PJI发生率为0.50%。与万古霉素用于TKA预防PJI相关的人均成本为1640.22美元,PJI发生率为1.00%。根据TKA发病率预测,到2040年,这种成本差异可能接近40亿美元。

结论

与万古霉素用于TKA预防相关的人均成本比头孢唑林高250%。这种差异是由于初始治疗成本增加、与延长输注时间相关的劳动力成本以及不同的PJI发生率。在基于价值的医疗时代,头孢唑林一直被证明是TKA预防PJI的金标准,且具有显著的成本优势。

相似文献

1
The financial burden of vancomycin as an alternative to cefazolin for periprosthetic joint infection prophylaxis in total knee arthroplasty.万古霉素替代头孢唑林用于全膝关节置换术中假体周围关节感染预防的经济负担。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Apr 26;145(1):272. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05879-9.
2
Hidden costs of first choice alternatives: A financial model of thromboprophylaxis and prosthetic joint infection prophylaxis in total knee arthroplasty.首选方案的隐性成本:全膝关节置换术中血栓预防和人工关节感染预防的财务模型
J Orthop. 2024 Nov 1;63:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.053. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Safety and effectiveness of intraosseous regional prophylactic antibiotics in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.关节置换术中骨内区域性预防性抗生素的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4233-4245. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05513-0. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
4
The AAHKS Best Podium Presentation Research Award: Intraosseous Vancomycin Reduces the Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.美国髋膝关节外科医师协会最佳讲台展示研究奖:骨内注射万古霉素可降低无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染率。
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Sep;40(9S1):S28-S32. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.060. Epub 2025 May 6.
5
How many doses and what type of antibiotic should be used as systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in primary hip and knee arthroplasty? A register-based study on 301,204 primary total and hemi- hip and total knee arthroplasties in Norway 2005-2023.在初次髋关节和膝关节置换术中,作为全身抗生素预防应使用多少剂量和何种类型的抗生素?一项基于挪威2005年至2023年301,204例初次全髋关节、半髋关节和全膝关节置换术的登记研究。
Acta Orthop. 2025 Mar 4;96:217-225. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.43003.
6
What Is the Incidence of and Outcomes After Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention (DAIR) for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in the AJRR Population?对于 AJRR 人群,清创术、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR)治疗人工关节周围感染的发病率和结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Nov 1;482(11):2042-2051. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003138. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
7
The Three-Month Wound Complication and Infection Rates After Vancomycin Powder and Dilute Povidone-Iodine Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in High-Risk Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.万古霉素粉末联合稀释聚维酮碘灌洗预防高风险全关节置换术后感染的三个月伤口并发症和感染率:一项多中心随机对照试验
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Sep;40(9S1):S487-S494. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.084. Epub 2025 May 9.
8
Is 18 F-fluoride PET/CT an Accurate Tool to Diagnose Loosening After Total Joint Arthroplasty?18F-氟化物PET/CT是诊断全关节置换术后假体松动的准确工具吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):415-428. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003228. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
9
Organism profiles and empirical treatments for periprosthetic joint infections.人工关节感染的病原体概况及经验性治疗
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 25;20(1):698. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06007-4.
10
Prior Cellulitis as a Risk Factor for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Influence of Timing and Antibiotic Prophylaxis.既往蜂窝织炎作为全膝关节置换术中假体周围关节感染的危险因素:时间和抗生素预防的影响
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.07.007.