Zhang Yanyan, Wang Wei, Li Guisen, Chen Shasha
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Department of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu 610072, China.
Department of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Kidney Diseases, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan, China.
Am J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;370(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2025.04.011. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
The aim of this study is to investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment and prognosis of crescentic glomerulonephritis (Crescentic GN) in patients with normal renal function at diagnosis, and compare to those with impaired renal function.
We conducted a retrospective review of patients with renal biopsy proven Crescentic GN at our center and divided them into normal eGFR group (eGFR≥60 ml/min/1.73 m) and low eGFR group (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m). Clinical and renal pathological findings at diagnosis and renal outcomes were compared between the two groups using t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test or Kruskal-Wallis H test.
From Jan 2010 to Dec 2021, 90 Crescentic GN patients with normal eGFR were included, in which clinicopathological diagnoses were LN (lupus nephritis) (60 cases, 66.77 %), IgAN (IgA nephropathy) (9 cases, 10 %), HSPN (Henoch-Schnlein purpura nephritis) (14 cases, 15.6 %) and AAV (ANCA-associated GN) (7 cases, 7.8 %). Compared with the low eGFR group (n = 300), the following characteristics were observed in the normal eGFR group: younger age (p < 0.001), female predominance (p < 0.001), longer time from onset to biopsy (p < 0.001), lower hypertension rate (p < 0.001), lower rate of oliguria (p < 0.001), and anemia (p < 0.001), lower levels of C3 (p < 0.001), C4 (p < 0.001) and Urine RBC (p < 0.001), higher titers of ANA (p < 0.001) and ds-DNA (p = 0.002), lower positive rate of ANCA (<0.001) and GBM (p = 0.02), less extra-renal involvement (p < 0.05), lower proportions of crescents (56.3(51.8-62.7) % vs 66.7 (56.3-81.3) %, p < 0.001) and glomerular sclerosis (p < 0.001), less severe tubulointerstitial lesion (p < 0.001) and interstitial inflammation (p < 0.001), higher degree of immune complex deposition of IgA, IgM, C3, C4 and C1q by Immunofluorescence. Normal eGFR group received lower frequency of intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy (71.2 % vs 89 %, p = 0.044) and dialysis treatment (0 % vs 53.7 %, p < 0.001). The 5- and 10-year cumulative renal survival rates from ESRD were 90.7 % vs 45.5 % and 58.3 % vs 43.7 %, respectively in normal and low eGFR group.
Crescentic GN may present with normal renal function, which has poor renal outcomes and may benefit from intensive immunosuppressive treatment. This often occurs in patients with abnormal immunological indicators and systemic autoimmune disease. Shorter time from onset to biopsy may help better management and improve long-term outcomes in these cases. Renal biopsy remains the diagnostic gold standard when urinary abnormalities are present in nephritis.
本研究旨在调查诊断时肾功能正常的新月体性肾小球肾炎(新月体性GN)患者的临床病理特征、治疗及预后,并与肾功能受损的患者进行比较。
我们对在本中心经肾活检证实为新月体性GN的患者进行了回顾性研究,并将他们分为正常估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)组(eGFR≥60 ml/min/1.73 m²)和低eGFR组(eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m²)。使用t检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验或Kruskal-Wallis H检验比较两组诊断时的临床和肾脏病理表现以及肾脏结局。
2010年1月至2021年12月,纳入90例eGFR正常的新月体性GN患者,其中临床病理诊断为狼疮性肾炎(LN)(60例,66.77%)、IgA肾病(IgAN)(9例,10%)、紫癜性肾炎(HSPN)(14例,15.6%)和抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体相关性肾小球肾炎(AAV)(7例,7.8%)。与低eGFR组(n = 300)相比,正常eGFR组具有以下特征:年龄较小(p < 0.001)、女性占优势(p < 0.001)、从发病到活检的时间较长(p < 0.001)、高血压发生率较低(p < 0.001)、少尿发生率较低(p < 0.001)和贫血发生率较低(p < 0.001),C3(p < 0.001)、C4(p < 0.001)和尿红细胞水平较低(p < 0.001),抗核抗体(ANA)和双链DNA(ds-DNA)滴度较高(p < 0.001和p = 0.002),抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)和肾小球基底膜(GBM)阳性率较低(<0.001和p = 0.02),肾外受累较少(p < 0.05),新月体比例较低(分别为56.3(51.8 - 62.7)% 对66.7(56.3 - 81.3)%, p < 0.001)和肾小球硬化比例较低(p < 0.001),肾小管间质病变(p < 0.001)和间质炎症较轻(p < 0.001),免疫荧光显示IgA、IgM、C3、C4和C1q的免疫复合物沉积程度较高。正常eGFR组接受静脉注射甲泼尼龙冲击治疗的频率较低(71.2%对89%,p = 0.044)和透析治疗的频率较低(0%对53.7%,p < 0.001)。正常和低eGFR组从终末期肾病(ESRD)开始计算的5年和10年累积肾脏生存率分别为90.7%对45.5%和58.3%对43.7%。
新月体性GN可能表现为肾功能正常,其肾脏结局较差,可能受益于强化免疫抑制治疗。这通常发生在免疫指标异常和系统性自身免疫性疾病患者中。从发病到活检的时间较短可能有助于这些病例的更好管理并改善长期结局。当肾炎患者出现尿液异常时,肾活检仍然是诊断的金标准。