Tang Camelia Qian Ying, Lai Sean Han Sheng, Ramruttun Amit Kumarsing, Chou Siaw Meng, Chong Alphonsus Khin Sze, Sechachalam Sreedharan
Department of Hand & Reconstructive Microsurgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
J Hand Microsurg. 2025 Apr 5;17(4):100254. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2025.100254. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Management of distal ulnar fractures remains controversial, partly due to its low incidence and operative challenges encountered during surgical fixation. This cadaveric study examined fracture displacement in isolated distal ulnar fractures, specifically AO Muller Q2 and Biyani Type I fracture pattern, during forearm pronosupination.6 fresh frozen cadaveric upper limbs amputated at mid-humerus were used. Soft tissues including proximal and distal radioulnar joints were carefully preserved. Specimens were inspected grossly and radiographically for absence of pathologies. Radiocarpal and midcarpal pinning was performed to facilitate quantification of forearm rotation. 2 markers were each placed proximal and distal to fracture site to quantify fracture displacement. 3-dimensional positional data was recorded using an optoelectronic system (Vicon MX motion capture system).Distance between the 2 markers increased in the proximodistal and radioulnar axis, and decreased in the dorsovolar axis when the forearm was rotated from neutral to 100° pronation. The inverse was observed during supination. Mean aggregate fracture site displacement increased to 9.17 ± 2.78 mm at 100° pronation. Statistically significant increase in aggregate fracture site displacement was observed from 60° pronation onwards. At 100° supination, the aggregate fracture site displacement was 4.58 ± 8.62 mm. When supinating from neutral to 100°, fracture displacement did not increase significantly.
from this study suggest that distal ulnar fractures are potentially stable, particularly in supination. However, unrestricted forearm pronation with inadequate immobilisation might still cause further fracture displacement. Further studies are required to assess distal ulnar fracture stability in vivo before treatment guidelines can be established.
尺骨远端骨折的治疗仍存在争议,部分原因是其发病率低以及手术固定时遇到的操作挑战。这项尸体研究检查了孤立的尺骨远端骨折(特别是AO Müller Q2和Biyani I型骨折模式)在前臂旋前旋后过程中的骨折移位情况。使用了6具在肱骨中部截断的新鲜冷冻尸体上肢。包括近端和远端桡尺关节在内的软组织被小心保留。对标本进行大体和影像学检查以排除病变。进行桡腕关节和腕中关节穿针以方便量化前臂旋转。在骨折部位的近端和远端各放置2个标记物以量化骨折移位。使用光电系统(Vicon MX动作捕捉系统)记录三维位置数据。当前臂从中立位旋转至100°旋前时,两个标记物之间的距离在近远轴和桡尺轴上增加,在背腹轴上减小。旋后时观察到相反情况。在100°旋前时,平均骨折部位总移位增加至9.17±2.78毫米。从60°旋前开始观察到骨折部位总移位有统计学意义的增加。在100°旋后时,骨折部位总移位为4.58±8.62毫米。当前臂从中立位旋后至100°时,骨折移位没有显著增加。
这项研究表明尺骨远端骨折可能是稳定的,尤其是在旋后位。然而,前臂无限制旋前且固定不充分仍可能导致骨折进一步移位。在制定治疗指南之前,需要进一步研究以评估尺骨远端骨折在体内的稳定性。