Yu Hengyi, Fang Yinian, Qi Xingxing, Luo Pan, He Zheng, Wang Kaifu, Lei Yongfang, Zhang Donglin, Zuo Qin, Liu Chang, Chen Qian, Liu Dong, Ren Xiuhua
Department of Pharmacy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Phase I Clinical Trial Unit, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2025 Jun;14(6):436-442. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.1529. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
Lurasidone is utilized in the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar depression in adults and adolescents. In this work, a randomized, single-dose, 2-period crossover study was designed and conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of 2 lurasidone tablets. A total of 111 healthy Chinese subjects received a single dose of 40 mg lurasidone test (T) or reference (R) tablets under fasting or fed conditions, with a 7-day washout period. Blood samples were collected and lurasidone plasma concentration was quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The pharmacokinetic properties were determined by a non-compartmental analysis, and C, AUC, and AUC were used for bioequivalence evaluation. As a result, the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios between T and R fell within 80%-125% whether under fasting or fed conditions, indicating that the 2 lurasidone formulations were bioequivalent. Meanwhile, the C and AUC of both T and R were approximately 2-3 times higher in the fed state compared to the fasting state. In addition, all adverse events (AEs) were classified into grade 1, and no serious or new AEs were reported. Additionally, a shorter t of the reference tablet was observed in this study compared to that of the other bioequivalence study conducted in older healthy Chinese subjects, which should be verified in the future.
鲁拉西酮用于治疗成人和青少年的精神分裂症及双相抑郁症。在本研究中,设计并开展了一项随机、单剂量、两周期交叉研究,以评估两种鲁拉西酮片的生物等效性和安全性。共有111名健康中国受试者在空腹或进食条件下接受40毫克鲁拉西酮试验(T)片或参比(R)片的单剂量给药,洗脱期为7天。采集血样,采用液相色谱 - 串联质谱法对鲁拉西酮血浆浓度进行定量。通过非房室分析确定药代动力学特性,并使用Cmax、AUC0 - t和AUC0 - ∞进行生物等效性评估。结果显示,无论在空腹还是进食条件下,T与R之间几何平均比值的90%置信区间均落在80% - 125%内,表明两种鲁拉西酮制剂具有生物等效性。同时,进食状态下T和R的Cmax和AUC0 - ∞均比空腹状态下约高2 - 3倍。此外,所有不良事件(AE)均为1级,未报告严重或新的不良事件。另外,与在老年健康中国受试者中进行的另一项生物等效性研究相比,本研究中参比片的t1/2较短,这一点有待未来验证。