Gallinnis Patrik Jan, Möller Rika, Ljimani Alexandra, Cabuk Yusuf, Scheuer Marie, Böttger Charlotte, Liang Cecilia, Nagel Armin M, Bechler Eric, Wittsack Hans-Jörg, Müller-Lutz Anja, Kamp Benedikt
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Magn Reson Med. 2025 Sep;94(3):1318-1325. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30525. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
Na MRI is a functional imaging technique that facilitates measurements of the renal corticomedullary sodium gradient (CMSG). The CMSG can be determined by a region of interest (ROI) in the renal parenchyma along the corticomedullary axis (Line method) or by dividing the renal parenchyma into concentric layers, using the twelve-layer concentric objects (TLCO) method. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences, strengths, and weaknesses in determining the CMSG using these methods.
Ten healthy volunteers were examined on a 3 T MRI-system. Na images were acquired using a double-tuned Na/H surface coil and a golden angle (GA) density-adapted 3D radial (DA-3D-RAD) sequence. The CMSG was determined with the Line and TLCO methods. Intra- and inter-reader analyses were performed by two radiologists.
The evaluated CMSG by the two methods does not differ statistically significantly. Compared to the Line method, the TLCO method provides improved results in terms of reliability, precision, reproducibility, and concordance in intra- and inter-reader analyses. A CMSG of (6.7 ± 2.6) mM/mm was determined using the TLCO method in the segmentation process with the lowest standard deviation.
The TLCO method shows superior performance in determining the CMSG compared to the Line method. Accordingly, the use of the TLCO method is recommended for future renal CMSG studies.
钠磁共振成像(Na MRI)是一种功能成像技术,有助于测量肾皮质髓质钠梯度(CMSG)。CMSG可通过沿皮质髓质轴在肾实质内的感兴趣区域(ROI)(线法)或使用十二层同心物体(TLCO)法将肾实质划分为同心层来确定。本研究的目的是调查使用这些方法确定CMSG时的差异、优点和缺点。
对10名健康志愿者进行3T磁共振成像系统检查。使用双调谐钠/氢表面线圈和黄金角(GA)密度自适应3D径向(DA-3D-RAD)序列采集钠图像。用线法和TLCO法测定CMSG。由两名放射科医生进行阅片者内和阅片者间分析。
两种方法评估的CMSG在统计学上无显著差异。与线法相比,TLCO法在阅片者内和阅片者间分析的可靠性、精密度、可重复性和一致性方面提供了更好的结果。在分割过程中,使用TLCO法确定的CMSG为(6.7±2.6)mM/mm,标准差最低。
与线法相比,TLCO法在确定CMSG方面表现出卓越的性能。因此,建议在未来的肾CMSG研究中使用TLCO法。