• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型零轮廓椎间融合器的生物力学性能:一项尸体研究。

Biomechanical performance of a novel zero-profile interbody cage: A cadaveric study.

作者信息

Zhu Jia, Cui Yangyang, Shen Hangkai, Liao Zhenhua, Gu Hongsheng, Liu Weiqiang

机构信息

Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Apr 29;20(4):e0317375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317375. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0317375
PMID:40299974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12040220/
Abstract

Zero-profile cage (ZPC) products have been widely used in anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) surgery. To develop a ZPC that meets the biomechanical requirements of the Chinese population, we designed a novel zero-profile cage (NZ) by analyzing the critical anatomical parameters of the cervical spine in healthy Chinese people. This study aims to investigate and assess whether the biomechanical properties of the newly designed NZ could satisfy the criteria for clinical application. The biomechanical properties of the NZ were evaluated by being implanted into cervical cadaveric specimens, measuring and analyzing the range of motion (ROM) of surgical segments. The experimental group in this study consisted of the NZ. As the control group, the gold standard product combination of ACDF surgery, anterior fixation plate combined with cage (P + C), and the FDA-approved ZPC product (Zero-P) were utilized. The experiment utilized six cadaveric specimens of human cervical vertebrae subjected to identical testing conditions. Following the completion of the test under intact conditions, fusion products were implanted into each specimen in segment C4-C5 in the following order: Zero-P, NZ, P + C. Biomechanical results revealed that the ROM of the surgical segment had decreased significantly under six basic working conditions following NZ implantation. Statistically significant differences were observed in the left bending (LB), right bending (RB), and left rotation (LR) conditions when compared to the intact conditions. The remaining working conditions did not exhibit a significant difference. However, the observed decreasing trend was consistent with previously documented research. In terms of the ROM of surgical segments, there was no statistically significant difference between the NZ group, the Zero-P group, and the P + C group. The biomechanical properties of the newly designed NZ in this study were superior, comparable to the fusion effect observed in conventional products of the Zero-P group and the P + C group. Furthermore, the biomechanical properties exhibited further improvement when subjected to LB and RB conditions. In the future, the newly designed NZ has great potential as a competitive choice for clinical applications.

摘要

零轮廓椎间融合器(ZPC)产品已广泛应用于颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)。为研发一款符合中国人群生物力学要求的ZPC,我们通过分析健康中国人颈椎的关键解剖参数,设计了一种新型零轮廓椎间融合器(NZ)。本研究旨在调查和评估新设计的NZ的生物力学性能是否能满足临床应用标准。通过将NZ植入颈椎尸体标本,测量并分析手术节段的活动范围(ROM),对NZ的生物力学性能进行评估。本研究的实验组由NZ组成。作为对照组,采用了ACDF手术的金标准产品组合,即前路固定板联合椎间融合器(P + C),以及美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的ZPC产品(Zero - P)。实验采用了六个在相同测试条件下的人体颈椎尸体标本。在完整条件下完成测试后,按照以下顺序将融合产品植入每个标本的C4 - C5节段:Zero - P、NZ、P + C。生物力学结果显示,植入NZ后,在六种基本工作条件下手术节段的ROM显著降低。与完整条件相比,在左侧弯曲(LB)、右侧弯曲(RB)和左旋(LR)条件下观察到统计学上的显著差异。其余工作条件未显示出显著差异。然而,观察到的下降趋势与先前记录的研究一致。在手术节段的ROM方面,NZ组、Zero - P组和P + C组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。本研究中新设计的NZ的生物力学性能优越,与Zero - P组和P + C组传统产品观察到的融合效果相当。此外,在LB和RB条件下,生物力学性能进一步改善。未来,新设计的NZ作为临床应用中有竞争力的选择具有巨大潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c680/12040220/e9bc0670d183/pone.0317375.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c680/12040220/ba6d44c1655b/pone.0317375.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c680/12040220/fec7e119c135/pone.0317375.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c680/12040220/bec81e01197c/pone.0317375.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c680/12040220/0be7204505de/pone.0317375.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c680/12040220/e9bc0670d183/pone.0317375.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c680/12040220/ba6d44c1655b/pone.0317375.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c680/12040220/fec7e119c135/pone.0317375.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c680/12040220/bec81e01197c/pone.0317375.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c680/12040220/0be7204505de/pone.0317375.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c680/12040220/e9bc0670d183/pone.0317375.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Biomechanical performance of a novel zero-profile interbody cage: A cadaveric study.一种新型零轮廓椎间融合器的生物力学性能:一项尸体研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 29;20(4):e0317375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317375. eCollection 2025.
2
Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.一体式椎间融合器与单节段颈椎融合构建中 ACDF 前路锁定钢板的生物力学比较
Spine J. 2014 Jan;14(1):128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.088. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
3
Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine.零切迹杂交融合构建与 2 节段钢板固定治疗颈椎相邻节段疾病。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Nov;21(5):753-60. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.SPINE131059. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
4
Biomechanical Comparison of Anterior Cervical Plate Fixation Versus Integrated Fixation Cage for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中颈椎前路钢板固定与一体化固定融合器的生物力学比较
Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Feb 1;38(1):E1-E6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001630. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
5
Biomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro study.具有三个一体式松质骨拉力螺钉的椎间融合器在双节段颈椎融合结构中的生物力学分析:一项体外研究。
Spine J. 2014 Dec 1;14(12):3002-10. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
6
Adjacent segment biomechanical changes after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using either a zero-profile device or cage plus plate: A finite element analysis.使用零轮廓装置或椎间融合器加钢板进行单节段或双节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后相邻节段的生物力学变化:有限元分析
Comput Biol Med. 2020 May;120:103760. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103760. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
7
A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques.用于多节段颈椎前路椎间融合的零轮廓锚定间隔器:与现有固定技术的生物力学比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Apr 1;40(7):E375-80. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000768.
8
[Biomechanical stability of unilateral pedicle screw fixation on cadaveric model simulated two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion].[尸体模型上模拟两级后路腰椎椎间融合术的单侧椎弓根螺钉固定的生物力学稳定性]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 May 1;49(5):436-9.
9
Can an Endplate-conformed Cervical Cage Provide a Better Biomechanical Environment than a Typical Non-conformed Cage?: A Finite Element Model and Cadaver Study.与典型的非贴合型椎间融合器相比,终板贴合型颈椎椎间融合器能否提供更好的生物力学环境?:有限元模型及尸体研究
Orthop Surg. 2016 Aug;8(3):367-76. doi: 10.1111/os.12261.
10
Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.单节段和双节段颈椎置换与融合术的生物力学比较:对邻近节段脊柱运动学的影响。
Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.01.006.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanics of sacroiliac joint fixation using lag screws: a cadaveric study.骶髂关节固定用拉力螺钉的生物力学:尸体研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Oct 28;18(1):807. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04311-5.
2
Impact of Obesity on Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality.肥胖对颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的影响:术后发病率和死亡率。
Turk Neurosurg. 2023;33(6):1047-1052. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.43115-22.1.
3
Biomechanical improvement of anterior talofibular ligament by augmentation repair of ligament advance reinforcement system: a cadaver study.
增强型前距腓韧带加固系统修复术改善前距腓韧带生物力学特性:尸体研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 Oct 10;23(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02136-x.
4
Exploring the latest advancements in physical therapy techniques for treating cervical spondylosis patients: A narrative review.探讨治疗颈椎病患者的物理治疗技术最新进展:叙述性综述。
Biomol Biomed. 2023 Sep 4;23(5):752-759. doi: 10.17305/bb.2023.9049.
5
Cervical Total Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Comparison of 30-Day Population Comorbidities and Perioperative Complications Using 6 Years of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File Data.颈椎全椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术:6 年美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划参与者使用文件数据比较 30 天人群合并症和围手术期并发症。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Feb;170:e79-e114. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.072. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
6
Cervical Spondylosis and Atypical Symptoms.颈椎病与非典型症状
Neurol India. 2021 May-Jun;69(3):602-603. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.319240.
7
Single-Level In Vitro Kinematic Comparison of Novel Inline Cervical Interbody Devices With Intervertebral Screw, Anchor, or Blade.新型颈椎椎间融合器与椎间螺钉、锚钉或刀片的单节段体外运动学比较
Global Spine J. 2019 Oct;9(7):697-707. doi: 10.1177/2192568219833055. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
8
Biomechanical analysis of cervical range of motion and facet contact force after a novel artificial cervical disc replacement.新型人工颈椎间盘置换术后颈椎活动范围及小关节接触力的生物力学分析
Am J Transl Res. 2019 May 15;11(5):3109-3115. eCollection 2019.
9
The design evolution of interbody cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中椎间融合器的设计演变:一项系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Apr 25;16:99. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0546-x.
10
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion may be more effective than anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.对于脊髓型颈椎病的治疗,颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术可能比颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术更有效。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Feb 13;16:29. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0490-9.