Taneja Shipra, Vanderhout Shelley, Heidebrecht Christine L, Nie Jason X, Seuren Lucas, Giri Rujuta, Kuluski Kerry, Mansfield Elizabeth, Hayes Chris, Reid Robert, Wodchis Walter P, Tang Terence
Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 30;15(4):e095771. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095771.
This study explored experiences with implementing and using the Epic electronic health record (EHR) across different clinical programmes within a single Canadian hospital system and specifically examined how local configuration decisions and implementation of its features and functionalities integrated well or introduced friction within workflows.
Qualitative description methodology involving semistructured interviews analysed using thematic analysis.
A large community hospital in Canada.
Healthcare providers, administrative staff and clinical leaders from seven clinical programmes.
66 individuals participated in interviews. Participants described that Epic's implementation impacted communication and teamwork, workflow and efficiency, and patient care, with these impacts varying across different programme settings. Participants reported that Epic improved inpatient care and safety, communication and teamwork, workflow and efficiency. However, several programmes also experienced challenges, including information overload and increased clerical tasks, impacting workflow efficiency. In programmes with an outpatient component, such as surgery and oncology, there were additional difficulties, such as connecting with external partners, user interface complexities that hindered task completion and concerns about potential compromises in patient care quality.
Health systems must consider the diverse needs of various clinical programmes when implementing an EHR. Customising the system interface and iteratively codesigning how health system staff incorporate the technology into their workflows are crucial to ensure an EHR seamlessly integrates across different settings, fosters high-quality care delivery and minimises user friction.
本研究探讨了在加拿大单一医院系统内不同临床项目中实施和使用Epic电子健康记录(EHR)的经验,并特别研究了本地配置决策以及其功能和特性的实施如何在工作流程中良好整合或产生摩擦。
采用定性描述方法,通过主题分析对半结构化访谈进行分析。
加拿大一家大型社区医院。
来自七个临床项目的医疗保健提供者、行政人员和临床负责人。
66人参与了访谈。参与者表示,Epic的实施对沟通与团队合作、工作流程与效率以及患者护理产生了影响,这些影响在不同项目环境中各不相同。参与者报告称,Epic改善了住院护理与安全、沟通与团队合作、工作流程与效率。然而,一些项目也遇到了挑战,包括信息过载和文书工作增加,影响了工作流程效率。在有门诊部分的项目中,如外科和肿瘤学,还存在其他困难,如与外部合作伙伴的联系、阻碍任务完成的用户界面复杂性以及对患者护理质量潜在妥协的担忧。
卫生系统在实施电子健康记录时必须考虑不同临床项目的多样化需求。定制系统界面并反复共同设计卫生系统工作人员将技术融入其工作流程的方式,对于确保电子健康记录在不同环境中无缝集成、促进高质量护理交付并最大限度减少用户摩擦至关重要。