Suppr超能文献

受害经历量表:将人际创伤和感知到的歧视置于有精神病体验且有或无护理需求的个体情境中

The victimisation experience schedule: contextualising interpersonal trauma and perceived discrimination in individuals with psychotic experiences with and without a need-for-care.

作者信息

Verdaasdonk I, Charalambides M A, Baumeister D, Jackson M, Garety P A, Morgan C, Ward T, Peters E

机构信息

Department of Psychosis Research and Innovation, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical, Neuro & Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Movements Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02917-0.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Victimisation is associated with psychotic experiences (PEs) across the psychosis continuum, yet contextual factors possibly influencing outcomes have been neglected. Building on the Unusual Experiences Enquiry study (UNIQUE) showing higher childhood trauma but lower discrimination in individuals with PEs without a need-for-care, compared to those with a need-for-care, this study utilized a novel instrument to examine victimisation-related contextual factors.

METHODS

Individuals from the UNIQUE study with persistent PEs with (clinical, n = 82) and without (non-clinical, n = 92) a need-for-care, and a control group without PEs (n = 83), completed the Victimisation Experiences Schedule (VES). This multidimensional instrument, comprising items from validated measures, assesses interpersonal traumas and discriminatory experiences, alongside contextual factors: impact, powerlessness, social support, age, duration, frequency, victim-perpetrator relationships, and reasons for discrimination.

RESULTS

There were no differences in lifetime interpersonal traumas between the clinical and non-clinical groups, with the latter reporting slightly more than controls. The clinical group experienced more lifetime perceived discrimination than the other groups. No differences emerged in impact and powerlessness at the time of victimisation; however, the clinical group reported lower positive social support and higher current impact and powerlessness for both types of victimisation. Discrimination occurred earlier and lasted longer in the clinical group than the other groups, often attributed to mental health and race/ethnicity, likely reflecting a higher proportion of racially minoritized individuals.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest an interplay between risk and protective factors around victimisation that may shape outcomes, highlighting the importance of assessing contextual factors of victimisation using comprehensive tools like the VES.

摘要

目的

在整个精神病连续谱中,受害经历与精神病性体验(PEs)相关,但可能影响结果的背景因素却被忽视了。基于“异常经历调查”(UNIQUE)研究表明,与有护理需求的个体相比,无护理需求的PEs个体童年创伤更高但歧视更低,本研究使用一种新颖的工具来检查与受害相关的背景因素。

方法

来自UNIQUE研究的有持续性PEs且有(临床组,n = 82)和无(非临床组,n = 92)护理需求的个体,以及一个无PEs的对照组(n = 83),完成了“受害经历量表”(VES)。这个多维度工具包含来自有效测量方法的项目,评估人际创伤和歧视经历,以及背景因素:影响、无力感、社会支持、年龄、持续时间、频率、受害者与施害者关系以及歧视原因。

结果

临床组和非临床组在终身人际创伤方面没有差异,非临床组报告的略多于对照组。临床组比其他组经历了更多的终身感知歧视。在受害时,影响和无力感方面没有差异;然而,临床组报告在两种受害类型中,积极社会支持较低,当前影响和无力感较高。临床组的歧视发生得更早且持续时间更长,比其他组更常归因于心理健康和种族/民族,这可能反映了种族少数群体个体的比例更高。

结论

结果表明围绕受害的风险和保护因素之间存在相互作用,这可能会影响结果,强调了使用像VES这样的综合工具评估受害背景因素的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验