• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑卒中后痉挛患者的运动诱发电位参数与重复经颅磁刺激治疗的相关性分析。

Analysis of MEP parameters in patients with post stroke spasticity in relation with rTMS therapy.

作者信息

Lahre Yuvraj, Bhoi Sanjeev Kumar, Jha Menka, Samal Priyanka, Naik Suprava

机构信息

Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, Odisha, India.

Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, Odisha, India.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Belg. 2025 May 3. doi: 10.1007/s13760-025-02796-x.

DOI:10.1007/s13760-025-02796-x
PMID:40317412
Abstract

BACKGORUND

Spasticity is a common complication of stroke limiting patient's daily activities. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is a painless and non-invasive method that can potentially reduce post-stroke spasticity (PSS). Motor evoked potentials (MEP) parameters have been shown to be related with prognosis of stroke patients. In this study we analysed the changes in MEP parameters after 3 sessions of low Hz rTMS therapy among PSS patients.

METHODS

Patients with upper limb spasticity after stroke of 3 months duration were randomised into active and sham groups. In the active group three sessions of 1000 pulses, 1 Hz rTMS at an intensity of 90% of resting motor threshold were applied to the primary motor area of the contra-lesional hemisphere over three consecutive days. Sham rTMS intensity was 0% with coil placed over scalp for same duration. MEP was measured pre and post therapy in each group.

RESULTS

106 patients were screened of which 50 patients were selected. 25 patients were allotted to active group and 25 to sham group. Mean amplitude of MEP on stimulation of normal side was 1.98±1.70 mV before versus 1.53±1.16 mV after therapy showing significant reduction p=0.001 (95% CI-.135 - -.630). Similarly, there was significant increase in latency after therapy [22.92±2.25 ms vs 24.26±2.62 ms, p=0.001 (95% CI-2.0 - -.96)]. There was no significant change in amplitude (1.05±.69 mV vs 1.17±1.01 mV) or latency (23.66±2.45 ms vs 24.05±2.58 ms) after therapy in sham group.

CONCLUSION

MEP parameters revealed even three sessions of therapy can be helpful in supressing normal hemisphere. We found reduction in amplitude and increase in latency of MEP after low Hz rTMS therapy in contra-lesional hemisphere suggesting its suppression after therapy.

摘要

背景

痉挛是中风的常见并发症,限制了患者的日常活动。经颅磁刺激是一种无痛且非侵入性的方法,有可能减轻中风后痉挛(PSS)。运动诱发电位(MEP)参数已被证明与中风患者的预后相关。在本研究中,我们分析了PSS患者接受3次低频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗后MEP参数的变化。

方法

将病程3个月的中风后上肢痉挛患者随机分为治疗组和假刺激组。治疗组连续3天对患侧半球的初级运动区施加3次,每次1000个脉冲,频率为1Hz,强度为静息运动阈值90%的rTMS。假刺激组线圈置于头皮相同位置,强度为0%,持续时间相同。每组在治疗前后测量MEP。

结果

共筛查106例患者,入选50例。治疗组和假刺激组各25例。治疗组刺激健侧时MEP的平均波幅治疗前为1.98±1.70mV,治疗后为1.53±1.16mV,差异有统计学意义(p=0.001,95%可信区间为-0.135至-0.630)。同样,治疗后潜伏期显著延长[22.92±2.25ms对24.26±2.62ms,p=0.001,95%可信区间为-2.0至-0.96]。假刺激组治疗后波幅(1.05±0.69mV对1.17±1.01mV)和潜伏期(23.66±2.45ms对24.05±2.58ms)无显著变化。

结论

MEP参数显示,即使3次治疗也有助于抑制健侧半球。我们发现患侧半球接受低频rTMS治疗后MEP波幅降低、潜伏期延长,提示治疗后该半球受到抑制。

相似文献

1
Analysis of MEP parameters in patients with post stroke spasticity in relation with rTMS therapy.脑卒中后痉挛患者的运动诱发电位参数与重复经颅磁刺激治疗的相关性分析。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2025 May 3. doi: 10.1007/s13760-025-02796-x.
2
Clinical efficacy observation of repetitive magnetic stimulation for treating upper limb spasticity after stroke.重复磁刺激治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的临床疗效观察
Sci Rep. 2025 May 22;15(1):17722. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02443-8.
3
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.用于慢性疼痛的非侵入性脑刺激技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 16;3(3):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub4.
4
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.用于慢性疼痛的非侵入性脑刺激技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 13;4(4):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub5.
5
Effect of Graded Motor Imagery Combined With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Upper Extremity Motor Function in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.分级运动想象联合重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 May;105(5):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.12.002. Epub 2023 Dec 17.
6
Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke.重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中后患者的功能障碍和残疾。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 28;9(9):CD011968. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011968.pub4.
7
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults.重复经颅磁刺激治疗成人创伤后应激障碍。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 2;8(8):CD015040. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015040.pub2.
8
Examining the effectiveness of motor imagery combined with non-invasive brain stimulation for upper limb recovery in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.探讨运动想象联合非侵入性脑刺激对脑卒中患者上肢功能恢复的有效性:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Nov 30;21(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01491-x.
9
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.用于慢性疼痛的非侵入性脑刺激技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 11(4):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub3.
10
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coupled With Visual-Feedback Cycling Exercise Improves Walking Ability and Walking Stability After Stroke: A Randomized Pilot Study.重复经颅磁刺激联合视觉反馈循环训练可改善脑卒中后的步行能力和步行稳定性:一项随机对照试验。
Neural Plast. 2024 Nov 26;2024:8737366. doi: 10.1155/np/8737366. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Post-Stroke Spasticity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.非侵入性脑刺激对中风后痉挛的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Brain Sci. 2022 Jun 27;12(7):836. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12070836.
2
Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.对中风后上肢运动功能进行患侧半球兴奋性重复经颅磁刺激:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 20;13:918597. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.918597. eCollection 2022.
3
Effects of Low-Frequency (0.5 Hz) and High-Frequency (10 Hz) Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neurological Function, Motor Function, and Excitability of Cortex in Ischemic Stroke Patients.
低频(0.5Hz)和高频(10Hz)重复经颅磁刺激对缺血性脑卒中患者神经功能、运动功能和皮质兴奋性的影响。
Neurologist. 2023 Jan 1;28(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000435.
4
Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in modulating cortical excitability in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经颅磁刺激对脑卒中患者皮质兴奋性调节作用的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Feb 22;19(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-00999-4.
5
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke rehabilitation: review of the current evidence and pitfalls.重复经颅磁刺激在中风康复中的应用:当前证据及陷阱综述
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2019 Sep 25;12:1756286419878317. doi: 10.1177/1756286419878317. eCollection 2019.
6
Cortical Modulation After Two Different Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocols in Similar Ischemic Stroke Patients.相似缺血性中风患者中两种不同重复经颅磁刺激方案后的皮质调制
Malays J Med Sci. 2018 Mar;25(2):116-125. doi: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.2.12. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
7
Clinical and electrophysiological impact of repetitive low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on the sensory-motor network in patients with restless legs syndrome.重复低频经颅磁刺激对不宁腿综合征患者感觉运动网络的临床及电生理影响
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2018 Feb 26;11:1756286418759973. doi: 10.1177/1756286418759973. eCollection 2018.
8
Relationship between rTMS effects and MEP features before rTMS.重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)效应与rTMS前运动诱发电位(MEP)特征之间的关系。
Neurosci Lett. 2018 Jan 18;664:110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.11.030. Epub 2017 Nov 12.
9
Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation.脑卒中后大脑可塑性的调制:神经康复的新模型。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Oct;10(10):597-608. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.162. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
10
Differential effects of motor cortical excitability and plasticity in young and old individuals: a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) study.年轻人和老年人运动皮层兴奋性及可塑性的差异效应:一项经颅磁刺激(TMS)研究
Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Jun 10;6:111. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00111. eCollection 2014.