• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠心病护理护士临床推理技能发展计划:一项行动研究

A clinical reasoning skills development plan for coronary care nurse: an action research.

作者信息

Zadeh Touba Hossein, Tabrizi Kian Norouzi, Fallahi-Khoshknab Masoud, Khankeh HamidReza, Shokooh Forozan

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Science (GUMS), Shahid Beheshti HWY., Daneshjoo Blvd., Rasht, 4146939814, Iran.

Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Department of Nursing, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Koodakyar St., Daneshjoo Ave., Evin, Tehran, 1985713834, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2025 May 3;24(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03106-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-03106-9
PMID:40319247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12049058/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical reasoning (CR) skills are among the most important nursing competencies for providing safe and effective care in critical care units. Development of CR skills in nursing needs a well-designed interactive process for change to effectively support clinical competence promotion. The aim of this study was to develop CR skills among coronary care nurses through an action plan.

METHODS

This participatory action research study was conducted in 2021 based on the framework of Hart and Bond (1995). Study setting was the coronary care unit of a leading heart center in Rasht, Iran. An action plan was designed and implemented with three main components, namely efficiency of nursing education, effective nursing management, and personal professional development. The results of the plan were provided to participants and strategies for improving the plan were determined. Quantitative outcome assessment was performed using the Nurses' Clinical Reasoning Skills Checklist and the Nurses' Clinical Reasoning Scale and data were analyzed through the Wilcoxon's test. Qualitative outcome assessment was performed through focus group discussions and data were analyzed through conventional content analysis.

RESULTS

The mean scores of CR skills significantly increased after the action plan and participants were satisfied with the plan. The four main categories of the outcomes of the plan were improvement of the thinking process, improvement of professional commitment, improvement of professional competence, and improvement of interprofessional communications. The challenges of the plan were limited efficiency of educational courses on the nursing process, incoherence in nursing documentation, mentors' inadequate supervision and instructions, and mentors' role pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

The CR skills action plan can improve coronary care nurses' CR skills and their competency in making sound clinical decisions and providing safe and quality care services.

摘要

背景

临床推理(CR)技能是在重症监护病房提供安全有效护理的最重要的护理能力之一。护理中CR技能的发展需要一个精心设计的互动变革过程,以有效地支持临床能力的提升。本研究的目的是通过一项行动计划来培养冠心病护理护士的CR技能。

方法

本参与性行动研究于2021年基于哈特和邦德(1995年)的框架进行。研究地点是伊朗拉什特一家领先心脏中心的冠心病监护病房。设计并实施了一项行动计划,该计划有三个主要组成部分,即护理教育的效率、有效的护理管理和个人职业发展。将计划的结果提供给参与者,并确定改进计划的策略。使用护士临床推理技能清单和护士临床推理量表进行定量结果评估,并通过威尔科克森检验分析数据。通过焦点小组讨论进行定性结果评估,并通过传统内容分析法分析数据。

结果

行动计划实施后,CR技能的平均得分显著提高,参与者对该计划感到满意。该计划结果的四个主要类别是思维过程的改善、职业承诺的提高、专业能力的提高和跨专业沟通的改善。该计划面临的挑战包括护理过程教育课程效率有限、护理记录不连贯、导师监督和指导不足以及导师角色压力。

结论

CR技能行动计划可以提高冠心病护理护士的CR技能,以及他们做出合理临床决策和提供安全优质护理服务的能力。

相似文献

1
A clinical reasoning skills development plan for coronary care nurse: an action research.冠心病护理护士临床推理技能发展计划:一项行动研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 3;24(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03106-9.
2
Barriers to the Development of Clinical Reasoning Skills among Coronary Care Nurses: A Qualitative Study.冠心病护理护士临床推理技能发展的障碍:一项定性研究。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2022 Nov 18;27(6):567-574. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_164_21. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
3
Exploration and prioritization of strategies to improve clinical reasoning skills among coronary care nurses: A qualitative study.探索和确定提高冠心病监护病房护士临床推理技能的策略:一项定性研究。
Nurs Forum. 2022 Sep;57(5):860-868. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12762. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
4
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
5
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
6
Challenges nurse educators experience with development of student nurses' clinical reasoning skills.护士教育者在培养护生临床推理能力方面所面临的挑战。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Oct;40:102623. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102623. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
7
Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and performance of postgraduate nursing students regarding clinical reasoning and evidence-based nursing: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Iran.伊朗研究生护理学生关于临床推理和循证护理的知识、态度及实践评估:一项多中心横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 Mar 14;24(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02919-y.
8
Student nurses' learning of practical skills in hospital placements: Perspectives of registered nurse mentors.实习护士在医院实习期间学习实践技能:注册护士导师的观点。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2025 Feb;83:104275. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104275. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
9
Critical soft skill competencies that clinical nurse educators consider important to evaluate in nurses.临床护士教育者认为对护士进行评估的关键软技能能力。
Nurs Open. 2024 Oct;11(10):e70047. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70047.
10
Experienced based co design: nursing preceptorship educational programme.基于经验的协同设计:护理带教教育项目
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Sep 17;8(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00385-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the persian version of the nursing clinical reasoning scale.护理临床推理量表波斯语版的心理测量特性。
Nurs Open. 2024 Jan;11(1):e2041. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2041.
2
Barriers to the Development of Clinical Reasoning Skills among Coronary Care Nurses: A Qualitative Study.冠心病护理护士临床推理技能发展的障碍:一项定性研究。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2022 Nov 18;27(6):567-574. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_164_21. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
3
Exploration and prioritization of strategies to improve clinical reasoning skills among coronary care nurses: A qualitative study.探索和确定提高冠心病监护病房护士临床推理技能的策略:一项定性研究。
Nurs Forum. 2022 Sep;57(5):860-868. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12762. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
4
Clinical reasoning in nursing students: A concept analysis.护理学生的临床推理:概念分析。
Nurs Forum. 2021 Oct;56(4):1008-1014. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12628. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
5
A Cross-Sectional Study: What Contributes to Nursing Students' Clinical Reasoning Competence?横断面研究:是什么促进了护理学生的临床推理能力?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 25;18(13):6833. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136833.
6
Quality of the documentation of the Nursing process in clinical decision support systems.护理过程文档在临床决策支持系统中的质量。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2021 May 21;29:e3426. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.4510.3426. eCollection 2021.
7
Exploring perceptions and barriers in developing critical thinking and clinical reasoning of nursing students: A qualitative study.探索护理专业学生批判性思维和临床推理培养中的认知与障碍:一项定性研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Dec;95:104600. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104600. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
8
Challenges nurse educators experience with development of student nurses' clinical reasoning skills.护士教育者在培养护生临床推理能力方面所面临的挑战。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Oct;40:102623. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102623. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
9
Documentation of the nursing process in public health institutions.公共卫生机构护理流程的记录。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2019 Aug 19;53:e03471. doi: 10.1590/S1980-220X2018003703471.
10
Inquiry-based learning and clinical reasoning scaffolds: An action research project to support undergraduate students' learning to 'think like a nurse'.基于探究的学习和临床推理支架:一项支持本科护生“像护士一样思考”的行动研究项目
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Jul;38:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 Jun 3.