Ferrario Chiara, Santini Sara, Vionnet Nathalie, Pasquier Jerôme, Puder Jardena J, Mantziari Styliani, Favre Lucie
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology, and Metabolism, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology, and Metabolism, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2025 Aug;21(8):893-899. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.03.008. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication of pregnancy, and the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is the standard diagnostic tool. However, in women after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), OGTT is less reliable and potentially unsafe due to the risk of hypoglycemia.
This study compares 3 methods of GDM diagnosis-OGTT, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-in post-RYGB pregnant women to assess and compare their diagnostic performance.
University Hospital, Switzerland.
A cohort of 15 pregnant women with a history of RYGB was evaluated between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. Each participant underwent OGTT, SMBG, and CGM. We assessed the sensitivity, specificity, and concordance of OGTT and SMBG against CGM, which served as the reference test. The incidence of hypoglycemia during OGTT was examined.
Using OGTT, 7 of the 15 participants were diagnosed with GDM, and 8 participants experienced hypoglycemia (glucose levels below 3.0 mmol/L). SMBG diagnosed GDM in 7 participants and CGM identified GDM in 11 participants. There was no significant concordance among OGTT, SMBG, and CGM (φ .26 (-.26 to .67) between OGTT and CGM (P = .57); φ -.07 (-.58 to .44) between OGTT and SMBG (P = 1), φ .26 (-.21 to .67), and between CGM and SMBG (P = .57). OGTT and SMBG demonstrated similar sensitivity and specificity, when compared to CGM (sensitivity of 54.40% and specificity of 75%) even though the patients diagnosed differed between the methods.
In this exploratory study, CGM appears to be a possible approach for diagnosing GDM in post-RYGB patients. SMBG is a commonly available method. OGTT poses risks of severe hypoglycemia. These findings support the need for tailored GDM screening approaches in postbariatric surgery pregnancies and highlight the importance of further research to establish specific guidelines for this population.
妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是一种常见的妊娠并发症,口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)是标准的诊断工具。然而,对于接受Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)后的女性,由于存在低血糖风险,OGTT的可靠性较低且可能不安全。
本研究比较了RYGB术后孕妇中3种GDM诊断方法——OGTT、自我血糖监测(SMBG)和持续葡萄糖监测(CGM),以评估和比较它们的诊断性能。
瑞士大学医院。
对15名有RYGB病史的孕妇在妊娠24至28周期间进行评估。每位参与者均接受OGTT、SMBG和CGM检查。我们以CGM作为参考测试,评估了OGTT和SMBG相对于CGM的敏感性、特异性和一致性。检查了OGTT期间低血糖的发生率。
使用OGTT,15名参与者中有7名被诊断为GDM,8名参与者发生低血糖(血糖水平低于3.0 mmol/L)。SMBG诊断出7名参与者患有GDM,CGM识别出11名参与者患有GDM。OGTT、SMBG和CGM之间无显著一致性(OGTT与CGM之间的φ为0.26(-0.26至0.67),P = 0.57;OGTT与SMBG之间的φ为-0.07(-0.58至0.44),P = 1;CGM与SMBG之间的φ为0.26(-0.21至0.67),P = 0.57)。与CGM相比,OGTT和SMBG表现出相似的敏感性和特异性(敏感性为54.40%,特异性为75%),尽管不同方法诊断出的患者有所不同。
在这项探索性研究中,CGM似乎是诊断RYGB术后患者GDM的一种可能方法。SMBG是一种常用的方法。OGTT存在严重低血糖风险。这些发现支持了在肥胖症手术后妊娠中需要采用量身定制的GDM筛查方法,并强调了进一步研究以建立针对该人群的具体指南的重要性。