Valenti Chiara, Di Pasquale Francesca, Pancrazi Gian Piero, Falocci Nicola, Nanussi Alessandro, Biscarini Andrea, Pagano Stefano
CISAS "Giuseppe Colombo", University of Padua, Via Venezia, 15, 35131, Padua, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Perugia, S. Andrea delle Fratte, 06156, Perugia, Italy.
Department of Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Perugia, S. Andrea delle Fratte, 06156, Perugia, Italy.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2025 Jun;42:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.11.025. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
Investigate the accuracy and differential diagnosis ability of surface electromyography in athletes.
Thirty basketball players underwent gnathological examination and divided in 3 groups: healthy, and with articular or muscular temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Electromyography was performed with Teethan®, assessing electrical activity of anterior temporalis and masseters during maximum voluntary contraction, and the correlations between electromyographic parameters: percent overlap coefficient, barycenter, torsion, musclework, asymmetry, and overall score (Ethics Committee N°: 4381/22).
Significant differences were found for anterior temporalis percent overlap coefficient (p = 0.03), overall score (p = 0.03), torsion (p = 0.04), and right anterior temporalis value (p = 0.03), comparing the medians of the groups. Muscular and Articular TMDs athletes had higher musculoskeletal asymmetry and musclework, trigger factors of TMDs related to greater force in clenching. Healthy participants have homogeneous and higher overall score values. Low values of anterior muscles percent overlap coefficient and torsion, and overall score, associated with high values of posterior asymmetric components, could more easily identify muscular patients. Linear discriminant analysis showed an overall good discriminating ability of electromyographic indices to identify TMDs.
Asymmetry and absolute musculoskeletal asymmetry, main indices related to TMDs, need special attention during electromyography. Since healthy athletes show higher correlations between parameters, they could be more easily recognized by electromyography, but the tool seems useful also with muscular TMDs. Athletes are often affected by trauma and muscular injuries, and potential candidates to develop temporomandibular dysfunctions TMDs.
研究表面肌电图在运动员中的准确性及鉴别诊断能力。
30名篮球运动员接受了颌学检查,并分为3组:健康组、患有关节性或肌肉性颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)组。使用Teethan®进行肌电图检查,评估最大自主收缩时颞肌前束和咬肌的电活动,以及肌电图参数之间的相关性:重叠百分比系数、重心、扭转、肌肉功、不对称性和总分(伦理委员会编号:4381/22)。
比较各组中位数时发现,颞肌前束重叠百分比系数(p = 0.03)、总分(p = 0.03)、扭转(p = 0.04)和右侧颞肌前束值(p = 0.03)存在显著差异。肌肉性和关节性TMD运动员的肌肉骨骼不对称性和肌肉功更高,TMD的触发因素与更大的紧咬力有关。健康参与者的总分值更均匀且更高。前肌重叠百分比系数和扭转值低以及总分低,与后不对称成分的高值相关,更容易识别肌肉性患者。线性判别分析表明,肌电图指标对识别TMD具有总体良好的鉴别能力。
不对称性和绝对肌肉骨骼不对称性是与TMD相关的主要指标,在肌电图检查期间需要特别关注。由于健康运动员的参数之间显示出更高的相关性,他们更容易通过肌电图识别,但该工具似乎对肌肉性TMD也有用。运动员经常受到创伤和肌肉损伤的影响,是发展颞下颌功能障碍TMD的潜在候选者。