Suppr超能文献

伊达比星与表柔比星用于巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期B期肝细胞癌经动脉化疗栓塞术的比较:一项开放标签、随机、IV期试验

Idarubicin versus Epirubicin in Transarterial Chemoembolization for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Open-label, Randomized, Phase IV Trial.

作者信息

Liu Haikuan, Fan Wenzhe, Li Haiqing, Qiao Liangliang, Liu Zhilong, Zhu Bowen, Guo Jian, Huang Kun, Tang Yiyang, Wen Jie, Xue Miao, Wu Yanqin, Zhao Yue, Jiang Yang, Liu Kangshou, Liang Junjie, Cao Mingrong, Li Jiaping

机构信息

Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University No.58 Zhongshan 2nd Rd, Guangzhou 510080, China.

Department of Tumor Minimally Invasive, Taian City Central Hospital, Taian, China.

出版信息

Radiology. 2025 May;315(2):e242315. doi: 10.1148/radiol.242315.

Abstract

Background Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is regarded as the first-line treatment for patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the optimal chemotherapeutic agent loaded in TACE remains controversial. Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of idarubicin and epirubicin as loaded drugs in drug-eluting bead (DEB)-TACE in patients with BCLC stage B HCC. Materials and Methods In this open-label, phase IV trial, patients with BCLC stage B HCC were recruited from four centers from August 2020 to October 2022 and randomly assigned (at a one-to-one ratio) to undergo idarubicin DEB-TACE or epirubicin DEB-TACE. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), which was measured from the time of randomization to the time of progression or death from any cause. The efficacy analysis was conducted on an intention-to-treat basis, and only participants who received treatment were included in the safety analysis. Results A total of 239 participants (median age, 57 years; IQR, 50-66 years; 210 male) were randomly assigned to the idarubicin group ( = 120) or the epirubicin group ( = 119). The primary analysis cutoff for PFS was March 1, 2023, with 167 events observed (70%; idarubicin group, 85 events; epirubicin group, 82 events). The median PFS was 10.8 months and 8.7 months in the idarubicin and epirubicin groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.84; = .002). The HR for median overall survival (OS) was 0.53 (95% CI: 0.31, 0.88), with OS rates of 81.5% and 77.3% at 12 months and 71.8% and 54.0% at 24 months for the idarubicin and epirubicin groups, respectively. The objective response rates were 70.8% and 57.1% for the idarubicin and epirubicin groups, respectively ( = .03). There was no evidence of a between-group difference in incidence of adverse events, including hematologic toxicity. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusion Idarubicin DEB-TACE increased survival in participants with BCLC stage B HCC, without an increase in the incidence of any adverse events. Clinical trial registration no. ChiCTR2000034758 © RSNA, 2025

摘要

背景

经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)被视为巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)B期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的一线治疗方法。然而,TACE中加载的最佳化疗药物仍存在争议。目的:比较伊达比星和表柔比星作为载药在药物洗脱微球(DEB)-TACE中用于BCLC B期HCC患者的疗效和安全性。材料与方法:在这项开放标签的IV期试验中,2020年8月至2022年10月从四个中心招募BCLC B期HCC患者,并随机(按1:1比例)分配接受伊达比星DEB-TACE或表柔比星DEB-TACE。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),从随机分组时间到因任何原因进展或死亡的时间进行测量。疗效分析基于意向性治疗原则进行,安全性分析仅纳入接受治疗的参与者。结果:共有239名参与者(中位年龄57岁;四分位间距,50 - 66岁;男性210名)被随机分配至伊达比星组(n = 120)或表柔比星组(n = 119)。PFS的主要分析截止时间为2023年3月1日,观察到167例事件(70%;伊达比星组85例事件;表柔比星组82例事件)。伊达比星组和表柔比星组的中位PFS分别为10.8个月和8.7个月(风险比[HR],0.61;95%置信区间:0.44,0.84;P = .002)。中位总生存期(OS)的HR为0.53(95%置信区间:0.31,0.88),伊达比星组和表柔比星组在12个月时的OS率分别为81.5%和77.3%,在24个月时分别为71.8%和54.0%。伊达比星组和表柔比星组的客观缓解率分别为70.8%和57.1%(P = .03)。在不良事件发生率方面,包括血液学毒性,没有证据表明组间存在差异。未观察到与治疗相关的死亡。结论:伊达比星DEB-TACE可提高BCLC B期HCC参与者的生存率,且未增加任何不良事件的发生率。临床试验注册号:ChiCTR2000034758 © RSNA,2025

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验