Lyng John W, Corsa Joshua G, Nawrocki Philip S, Raetzke Brad D, Nackenson Josh, Bosson Nichole
Department of Emergency Medicine, North Memorial Health Level I Trauma Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
North County Regional Fire Authority, Stanwood, Washington.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2025 May 29:1-16. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2025.2493846.
Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians encounter patients with suspected femoral shaft fractures due to both blunt and penetrating trauma. Traction splinting is commonly used by many EMS systems on the premise that it might reduce the perceived risk for hemorrhage and can help reduce pain. It has been called into question whether femoral shaft fractures are truly causative of hemorrhagic shock. Additionally, traction splinting has been associated with iatrogenic injuries, especially if applied to patients with co-morbid lower extremity and pelvic injuries. The application of a traction splint is also an infrequent EMS intervention, raising concerns about skill decay and maintenance of competency. Non-traction splinting, or static splinting, is also a therapeutic option in the field management of suspected femur fractures. Because the benefits of traction splinting versus static splinting of suspected femur fractures in the EMS setting are uncertain, the National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) performed a review of the evidence regarding EMS management of femoral shaft fractures and developed the following recommendations and summarization of the evidence.
紧急医疗服务(EMS)临床医生会遇到因钝性和穿透性创伤而疑似股骨干骨折的患者。许多EMS系统普遍使用牵引夹板,其前提是它可能会降低感知到的出血风险,并有助于减轻疼痛。股骨干骨折是否真的会导致失血性休克,这一点已受到质疑。此外,牵引夹板与医源性损伤有关,特别是应用于合并下肢和骨盆损伤的患者时。牵引夹板的应用在EMS干预中也不常见,这引发了对技能衰退和能力维持的担忧。非牵引夹板,即静态夹板,也是疑似股骨骨折现场处理中的一种治疗选择。由于在EMS环境中,牵引夹板与疑似股骨骨折的静态夹板相比,其益处尚不确定,美国紧急医疗服务医师协会(NAEMSP)对有关EMS处理股骨干骨折的证据进行了回顾,并制定了以下建议和证据总结。