Suppr超能文献

生物扰动碳酸盐地层中实验室与便携式现场渗透率测量的对比研究

Comparative study of laboratory and portable spot permeability measurements in bioturbated carbonate strata.

作者信息

Al-Lehyani Ayman, Eltom Hassan A, Al-Shuhail Abdullatif, Abdullah Eassa, El-Husseiny Ammar

机构信息

Geosciences Department, College of Petroleum Engineering Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.

Center for Integrative Petroleum Research, College of Petroleum Engineering Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 7;15(1):15947. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00697-w.

Abstract

In bioturbated strata, defining and obtaining a representative elementary volume for permeability measurements presents significant challenges. To address this, spot permeability is often used as an alternative method to estimate the bulk permeability of these complex strata. However, laboratory measurements of spot permeability require steady-state nitrogen gas injection and careful sample preparation including slab cutting which makes the process both time-consuming and resource-intensive. Alternatively, field measurements using portable devices offer a more cost-effective, straightforward, and real-time approach for assessing permeability in situ. To evaluate the accuracy of portable devices in measuring spot permeability in bioturbated strata, we compare and contrast permeability measurements on the same rock samples (from the Hanifa Formation in central Saudi Arabia) using two different techniques: the sophisticated laboratory-based AutoScan system and the portable TinyPerm 3 field device both from New England Research (NER). Two sets of permeability data comprising 64 measurements were obtained and analyzed graphically using Whisker Box Plots, Bland-Altman Plot, Curve Matching, and Cross Plots, as well as statistically through correlation analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The graphical analysis revealed no substantial difference in permeability measured by the two methods, a finding further supported by ANOVA results, which indicated no statistically significant difference (P-value > 0.05). Additionally, the correlation plot between the permeability measurements from the two methods yielded a straight line with an R[Formula: see text] value greater than 0.9, demonstrating a strong agreement. This study highlights the potential of using portable handheld permeameters to measure spot permeability of bioturbated strata in the field, offering a cost-effective, accurate, and real-time alternative to laboratory-based techniques in estimating their bulk permeability.

摘要

在生物扰动地层中,定义并获取用于渗透率测量的代表性基本体积面临重大挑战。为解决这一问题,点渗透率常被用作估计这些复杂地层总体渗透率的替代方法。然而,实验室测量点渗透率需要稳态氮气注入以及包括切割岩板在内的仔细样品制备,这使得该过程既耗时又资源密集。另外,使用便携式设备进行现场测量为原位评估渗透率提供了一种更具成本效益、直接且实时的方法。为评估便携式设备在测量生物扰动地层点渗透率方面的准确性,我们使用两种不同技术对相同岩石样品(来自沙特阿拉伯中部的哈尼法组)的渗透率测量结果进行了比较和对比:一种是基于实验室的精密AutoScan系统,另一种是来自新英格兰研究公司(NER)的便携式TinyPerm 3现场设备。我们获得了两组包含64次测量的渗透率数据,并使用箱线图、布兰德-奥特曼图、曲线匹配和交叉图进行了图形分析,同时通过相关性分析和方差分析(ANOVA)进行了统计分析。图形分析表明两种方法测量的渗透率没有实质性差异,方差分析结果进一步支持了这一发现,该结果表明不存在统计学上的显著差异(P值>0.05)。此外,两种方法的渗透率测量值之间的相关图产生了一条R[公式:见正文]值大于0.9的直线,表明两者高度一致。这项研究突出了使用便携式手持式渗透仪在现场测量生物扰动地层点渗透率的潜力,为基于实验室的技术在估计其总体渗透率方面提供了一种具有成本效益、准确且实时的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb45/12059123/30d269adecb9/41598_2025_697_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验