Dhawan Dhriti, Kikut-Stein Ava, Pinnamaneni Ramya, McCloud Rachel, Viswanath K
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, LW 601, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 7;25(1):1689. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22911-0.
Vaccine hesitancy affects vaccine uptake. Despite initial reluctance to receive the COVID-19 vaccine in 2020, by 2021, many individuals chose to get vaccinated once vaccines became available, while others who had previously been willing to vaccinate changed their minds. In this study, we focused on people who did not follow-up on their intentions to (or not to) vaccinate and why.
This longitudinal study draws on data from a two-wave nationally representative survey of Americans from July 2020 (T1) and July/August 2021 (T2) to examine the factors that contribute to the COVID-19 vaccination-related intention-behavior gap, using multivariable logistic regression.
By T2, 52% of previously COVID-19 vaccine-hesitant individuals were vaccinated and 14% of previously pro-vaccine individuals remained unvaccinated. Among the vaccine-hesitant individuals, factors associated with vaccination included higher risk perception, general vaccine acceptance, being informed about the vaccines, endorsing less COVID-19 misinformation, confidence in scientists, and having health insurance. Among the pro-vaccine individuals, factors associated with being unvaccinated included lower risk perception, lower general vaccine acceptance, being less informed about the vaccines, partisan identification, lower confidence in scientists and not having health insurance.
The study highlights the factors that explain intention-behavior gap in vaccination. We identified what explains individuals' intentions to vaccinate and their actual vaccination behavior one year later, as well as the potential to influence vaccine-hesitant individuals to vaccinate and pro-vaccine individuals from actualizing their vaccination intentions. Understanding these factors is essential in developing evidence-based strategic communications, which can help convince individuals to vaccinate and increase the uptake of COVID-19 as well as other adult vaccines.
疫苗犹豫会影响疫苗接种率。尽管在2020年最初有人不愿接种新冠疫苗,但到2021年,一旦有疫苗可用,许多人选择接种,而其他先前愿意接种的人却改变了主意。在本研究中,我们关注那些未按照其接种(或不接种)意图采取行动的人及其原因。
这项纵向研究利用了2020年7月(T1)和2021年7月/8月(T2)对美国人进行的两波全国代表性调查的数据,通过多变量逻辑回归来研究导致新冠疫苗接种相关意图与行为差距的因素。
到T2时,先前对新冠疫苗犹豫的个体中有52%接种了疫苗,而先前支持接种疫苗的个体中有14%仍未接种。在疫苗犹豫的个体中,与接种相关的因素包括更高的风险认知、对疫苗的总体接受度、了解疫苗信息、认可较少的新冠错误信息、对科学家的信任以及拥有医疗保险。在支持接种疫苗的个体中,与未接种相关的因素包括较低的风险认知、较低的疫苗总体接受度、对疫苗了解较少、党派认同、对科学家的信心较低以及没有医疗保险。
该研究突出了导致疫苗接种意图与行为差距的因素。我们确定了一年后解释个体接种意图及其实际接种行为的因素,以及影响疫苗犹豫个体接种和支持接种疫苗个体实现其接种意图的潜力。了解这些因素对于制定基于证据的战略沟通至关重要,这有助于说服个体接种疫苗并提高新冠疫苗以及其他成人疫苗的接种率。