• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估患有“人格障碍”的涉司法人员的职业参与度:定量评估及其特性。

Assessing occupational participation among justice-involved people 'with a personality disorder': Quantitative assessments and their properties.

作者信息

Connell Catriona, McKay Elizabeth Anne

机构信息

University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.

University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Br J Occup Ther. 2024 Oct;87(10):625-635. doi: 10.1177/03080226241254768. Epub 2024 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1177/03080226241254768
PMID:40336880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11887891/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is little evidence for what influences occupational participation for justice-involved people 'with a personality disorder' living in community contexts, and no validated occupational participation assessments specific to this group. We assessed a sample of justice-involved people 'with a personality disorder' to ascertain what influences occupational participation using commonly applied assessments and evaluated their construct validity.

METHOD

As part of a mixed-methods study, a purposive sample of 18 justice-involved people 'with a personality disorder' were scored on the Model of Human Occupational Screening Tool and Occupational Performance History Interview-Version Two scales. Mean scores were calculated per Model of Human Occupational Screening Tool (MOHOST) item and Occupational Performance History Interview-Version Two (OPHI-II) items and scales and compared to published data. Mann-Whitney Tests were used to identify within-sample differences based on demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Participants had low scores on MOHOST items and OPHI-II items and scales. Differences were identified compared to published data. Within-sample differences were most apparent in comparisons by employment status and ethnicity. The OPHI-II scales did not operate as intended with this population and recommended adjustments impacted its construct validity.

CONCLUSION

Replication is required with a larger random sample. Integrating these data with qualitative exploration would further elucidate factors influencing occupational participation in this population.

摘要

引言

对于生活在社区环境中的“患有精神障碍”的涉案人员,职业参与受哪些因素影响的证据很少,且没有针对该群体的经过验证的职业参与评估工具。我们对“患有精神障碍”的涉案人员样本进行了评估,以确定使用常用评估工具时职业参与受哪些因素影响,并评估了这些工具的结构效度。

方法

作为一项混合方法研究的一部分,对18名“患有精神障碍”的涉案人员进行了目的抽样,让他们在人类职业筛选工具模型(Model of Human Occupational Screening Tool,MOHOST)和职业表现历史访谈第二版(Occupational Performance History Interview-Version Two,OPHI-II)量表上进行评分。计算了MOHOST项目、OPHI-II项目、量表的平均得分,并与已发表的数据进行比较。使用曼-惠特尼检验来确定基于人口统计学特征的样本内差异。

结果

参与者在MOHOST项目以及OPHI-II项目和量表上的得分较低。与已发表的数据相比存在差异。样本内差异在按就业状况和种族进行的比较中最为明显。OPHI-II量表在该人群中的表现未达预期,建议的调整影响了其结构效度。

结论

需要对更大的随机样本进行重复研究。将这些数据与定性探索相结合将进一步阐明影响该人群职业参与的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d86b/11887891/7c241bccb77f/10.1177_03080226241254768-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d86b/11887891/e20b938c5ea6/10.1177_03080226241254768-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d86b/11887891/7c241bccb77f/10.1177_03080226241254768-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d86b/11887891/e20b938c5ea6/10.1177_03080226241254768-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d86b/11887891/7c241bccb77f/10.1177_03080226241254768-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing occupational participation among justice-involved people 'with a personality disorder': Quantitative assessments and their properties.评估患有“人格障碍”的涉司法人员的职业参与度:定量评估及其特性。
Br J Occup Ther. 2024 Oct;87(10):625-635. doi: 10.1177/03080226241254768. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
2
Psychometric properties of the second version of the Occupational Performance History Interview (OPHI-II).职业表现历史访谈第二版(OPHI-II)的心理测量特性。
Am J Occup Ther. 2001 May-Jun;55(3):260-7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.55.3.260.
3
Developing an Intervention to Improve Occupational Participation for Justice-Involved People with a Personality Disorder: Defining and Describing Intervention Components.制定一项干预措施,以改善涉及人格障碍的司法涉案人员的职业参与:确定和描述干预措施的组成部分。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2022 May;66(6-7):774-788. doi: 10.1177/0306624X211013520. Epub 2021 May 10.
4
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Occupational identity of adolescents with ADHD: A mixed methods study.多动症青少年的职业认同:一项混合方法研究。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2017 Jan;24(1):32-40. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2016.1217927. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Therapists' and clients' perceptions of the occupational performance history interview.
Occup Ther Health Care. 2005;19(1-2):173-92. doi: 10.1080/J003v19n01_13.
8
The prevalence and severity of loneliness and deficits in perceived social support among who have received a 'personality disorder' diagnosis or have relevant traits: a systematic review.被诊断为“人格障碍”或具有相关特征的人群中孤独感和感知社会支持不足的发生率和严重程度:系统评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05471-8.
9
People with severe problematic personality traits and offending histories: What influences occupational participation?具有严重问题人格特质和犯罪史的人:哪些因素影响职业参与?
Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;60:14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 14.
10
Effectiveness of outpatient and community treatments for people with a diagnosis of 'personality disorder': systematic review and meta-analysis.门诊和社区治疗对被诊断为“人格障碍”的人的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 21;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04483-0.

本文引用的文献

1
People with severe problematic personality traits and offending histories: What influences occupational participation?具有严重问题人格特质和犯罪史的人:哪些因素影响职业参与?
Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;60:14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 14.
2
Experience of Occupations among People Living with a Personality Disorder.人格障碍患者的职业经历。
Occup Ther Int. 2019 Mar 27;2019:9030897. doi: 10.1155/2019/9030897. eCollection 2019.
3
What influences social outcomes among offenders with personality disorder: A systematic review.
人格障碍罪犯的社会结局受哪些因素影响:一项系统综述。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2018 Oct;28(5):390-396. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2082. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
4
It's a journey, not a destination - From dangerous and severe personality disorder (DSPD) to the offender personality disorder (OPD) pathway.
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2017 Jul;27(3):207-213. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2027.
5
Personality disorder: still the patients psychiatrists dislike?人格障碍:仍然是精神科医生不喜欢的患者群体吗?
BJPsych Bull. 2017 Feb;41(1):12-17. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.115.052456.
6
THE EFFECT OF STIGMA ON CRIMINAL OFFENDERS' FUNCTIONING: A LONGITUDINAL MEDIATIONAL MODEL.污名对罪犯机能的影响:一个纵向中介模型。
Deviant Behav. 2016 Feb 1;37(2):196-218. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2014.1004035. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
7
The Natural History of Antisocial Personality Disorder.反社会型人格障碍的自然病程。
Can J Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;60(7):309-14. doi: 10.1177/070674371506000703.
8
Thirty years of research on the level of service scales: a meta-analytic examination of predictive accuracy and sources of variability.服务水平量表的三十年研究:预测准确性和变异性来源的元分析检验。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Mar;26(1):156-76. doi: 10.1037/a0035080. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
9
Personality disorders, violence, and antisocial behavior: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.人格障碍、暴力和反社会行为:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
J Pers Disord. 2012 Oct;26(5):775-92. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2012.26.5.775.
10
Attainment and stability of sustained symptomatic remission and recovery among patients with borderline personality disorder and axis II comparison subjects: a 16-year prospective follow-up study.边缘型人格障碍患者与轴 II 对照受试者的持续症状缓解和康复的获得和稳定性:一项 16 年的前瞻性随访研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 2012 May;169(5):476-83. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11101550.