Connell Catriona, McKay Elizabeth Anne
University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Br J Occup Ther. 2024 Oct;87(10):625-635. doi: 10.1177/03080226241254768. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
There is little evidence for what influences occupational participation for justice-involved people 'with a personality disorder' living in community contexts, and no validated occupational participation assessments specific to this group. We assessed a sample of justice-involved people 'with a personality disorder' to ascertain what influences occupational participation using commonly applied assessments and evaluated their construct validity.
As part of a mixed-methods study, a purposive sample of 18 justice-involved people 'with a personality disorder' were scored on the Model of Human Occupational Screening Tool and Occupational Performance History Interview-Version Two scales. Mean scores were calculated per Model of Human Occupational Screening Tool (MOHOST) item and Occupational Performance History Interview-Version Two (OPHI-II) items and scales and compared to published data. Mann-Whitney Tests were used to identify within-sample differences based on demographic characteristics.
Participants had low scores on MOHOST items and OPHI-II items and scales. Differences were identified compared to published data. Within-sample differences were most apparent in comparisons by employment status and ethnicity. The OPHI-II scales did not operate as intended with this population and recommended adjustments impacted its construct validity.
Replication is required with a larger random sample. Integrating these data with qualitative exploration would further elucidate factors influencing occupational participation in this population.
对于生活在社区环境中的“患有精神障碍”的涉案人员,职业参与受哪些因素影响的证据很少,且没有针对该群体的经过验证的职业参与评估工具。我们对“患有精神障碍”的涉案人员样本进行了评估,以确定使用常用评估工具时职业参与受哪些因素影响,并评估了这些工具的结构效度。
作为一项混合方法研究的一部分,对18名“患有精神障碍”的涉案人员进行了目的抽样,让他们在人类职业筛选工具模型(Model of Human Occupational Screening Tool,MOHOST)和职业表现历史访谈第二版(Occupational Performance History Interview-Version Two,OPHI-II)量表上进行评分。计算了MOHOST项目、OPHI-II项目、量表的平均得分,并与已发表的数据进行比较。使用曼-惠特尼检验来确定基于人口统计学特征的样本内差异。
参与者在MOHOST项目以及OPHI-II项目和量表上的得分较低。与已发表的数据相比存在差异。样本内差异在按就业状况和种族进行的比较中最为明显。OPHI-II量表在该人群中的表现未达预期,建议的调整影响了其结构效度。
需要对更大的随机样本进行重复研究。将这些数据与定性探索相结合将进一步阐明影响该人群职业参与的因素。