Schoen Martin W, Doherty Jason, Eaton Daniel, Khan Saira, Candelieri Danielle, Fedele Nicholas, Baxi Priya, Wynveen Molly, Pickett Carley, Wilson R Jackson, Stackable Kaitlin, Ingram Kara, Karunanandaa Krishny, Agarwal Rohan, Rajasekhar Abhinav, Riekhof Forest, Govindan Srinivas, Cheranda Nina, Knoche Eric M, Etzioni Ruth D, Montgomery R Bruce
St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Veterans Affairs St Louis Healthcare System, St Louis, Missouri.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e259433. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9433.
Combination therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has been widely adopted, yet clinical use and outcomes are unknown. Furthermore, optimal therapy is uncertain due to lack of direct comparison of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and docetaxel in high-volume disease.
To evaluate the use of combination therapy and its association with overall survival among patients with mHSPC and to compare ARPIs vs docetaxel doublet therapy by volume of disease.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the US Veterans Health Administration among 6216 US veterans with de novo mHSPC from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2022, treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) within 3 months of diagnosis. Treatments for mHSPC were collected within 4 months of ADT. Volume of disease was assessed from radiology report review. Data were analyzed from July 2023 to October 2024.
Overall survival (OS) and clinical progression-free survival (PFS), indicated by time to castration resistance or death.
Among 6216 male veterans with mHSPC (mean [SD] age, 73.9 [9.7] years), use of combination therapy increased from 344 of 637 veterans (54.0%) in 2020 to 465 of 737 veterans (63.1%) in 2022. Among 4106 veterans treated from 2017 to 2022, combination therapy was associated with longer OS (40.3 [95% CI, 38.0-42.1] months vs 33.0 [95% CI, 31.2-35.1] months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.74-0.87]) and was used more frequently among younger veterans with fewer comorbidities. Among 1174 veterans with high-volume mHSPC, there was no difference in OS between ARPIs and docetaxel (32.3 [95% CI, 29.5-35.3] months vs 34.7 [95% CI, 31.7-37.1] months; HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.91-1.23]); however, ARPIs were associated with longer PFS (18.7 [95% CI, 17.1-20.9] months vs 16.0 [95% CI, 14.0-17.7] months; HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.70-0.91]; P = .001). In a multivariable model of high-volume mHSPC, there was no difference in OS between ARPIs and docetaxel (adjusted HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.76-1.05]). Among 366 veterans with low-volume mHSPC, there was no difference in OS between ARPIs and docetaxel (68.4 [95% CI, 52.6 months to not reached] months vs 55.3 [95% CI, 41.7-78.9] months; HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.58-1.13]), but ARPIs were associated with longer PFS (39.7 [95% CI, 34.3-52.9] months vs 24.0 [95% CI, 20.3-32.9] months; HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.43-0.76]).
In this cross-sectional study of veterans with de novo mHSPC, use of combination therapies increased over time and were associated with longer survival compared with ADT monotherapy. In both high- and low-volume mHSPC, no differences in OS were observed between ARPI and docetaxel combinations; however, ARPIs had longer PFS. Future research into the role of docetaxel is needed to elucidate the benefit of chemotherapy in mHSPC.
转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)的联合治疗已被广泛采用,但临床应用情况和治疗结果尚不清楚。此外,由于在高负荷疾病中缺乏雄激素受体通路抑制剂(ARPI)与多西他赛的直接比较,最佳治疗方案仍不确定。
评估mHSPC患者联合治疗的使用情况及其与总生存期的关联,并按疾病负荷比较ARPI与多西他赛双联疗法。
设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性横断面研究在美国退伍军人健康管理局开展,研究对象为2013年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间6216名初诊为mHSPC的美国退伍军人,他们在诊断后3个月内接受了雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)。mHSPC的治疗情况在ADT后4个月内收集。通过审查放射学报告评估疾病负荷。数据于2023年7月至2024年10月进行分析。
总生存期(OS)和临床无进展生存期(PFS),以去势抵抗或死亡时间表示。
在6216名患有mHSPC的男性退伍军人中(平均[标准差]年龄为73.9[9.7]岁),联合治疗的使用比例从2020年637名退伍军人中的344名(54.0%)增至2022年737名退伍军人中的465名(63.1%)。在2017年至2022年接受治疗的4106名退伍军人中,联合治疗与更长的OS相关(40.3[95%CI,38.0 - 42.1]个月 vs 33.0[95%CI,31.2 - 35.1]个月;风险比[HR],0.80[95%CI,0.74 - 0.87]),且在合并症较少的年轻退伍军人中使用更为频繁。在1174名高负荷mHSPC退伍军人中,ARPI与多西他赛的OS无差异(32.3[95%CI,29.5 - 35.3]个月 vs 34.7[95%CI,31.7 - 37.1]个月;HR,1.06[95%CI,0.91 - 1.23]);然而,ARPI与更长的PFS相关(18.7[95%CI,17.1 - 20.9]个月 vs 16.0[95%CI,14.0 - 17.7]个月;HR,0.80[95%CI,0.70 - 0.91];P = 0.001)。在高负荷mHSPC的多变量模型中,ARPI与多西他赛的OS无差异(调整后HR,0.89[95%CI,0.76 - 1.05])。在366名低负荷mHSPC退伍军人中,ARPI与多西他赛的OS无差异(68.4[95%CI,52.6个月至未达到]个月 vs 55.3[95%CI,41.7 - 78.9]个月;HR,0.81[95%CI,0.58 - 1.13]),但ARPI与更长的PFS相关(39.7[95%CI,34.3 - 52.9]个月 vs 24.0[95%CI,20.3 - 32.9]个月;HR,0.57[95%CI,0.43 - 0.76])。
在这项针对初诊mHSPC退伍军人的横断面研究中,联合治疗的使用随时间增加,与ADT单药治疗相比生存期更长。在高负荷和低负荷mHSPC中,ARPI与多西他赛联合治疗的OS均无差异;然而,ARPI的PFS更长。需要对多西他赛的作用进行进一步研究,以阐明化疗在mHSPC中的益处。