McIntyre Roger S, Maletic Vladimir, Masand Prakash, Wilson Andrea C, Yu Jun, Adams Julie L, Kerolous Majid
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2025 Sep 15;385:119366. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.05.026. Epub 2025 May 6.
Anhedonia is a core diagnostic symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD). Post hoc analyses evaluated cariprazine plus antidepressant treatment (ADT) in patients with MDD and moderate-to-severe anhedonia.
Data were analyzed from a positive phase 3, randomized, fixed-dose (1.5 or 3 mg/d), double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group cariprazine study (NCT03738215). Post hoc outcomes (e.g., change from baseline to week 6 in MADRS total score, MADRS anhedonia subscale score, MADRS anhedonia subscale item scores including item 8 [inability to feel]) were assessed in 2 anhedonia patient subgroups (baseline MADRS anhedonia subscale score ≥ 18; baseline MADRS anhedonia item 8 score ≥ 4) using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures.
Most patients met subgroup inclusion criteria (anhedonia subscale score ≥ 18 = 584 [77.8 %]; anhedonia item 8 score ≥ 4 = 508 [67.6 %]). LSMDs in change from baseline were statistically significant in favor of adjunctive cariprazine versus adjunctive placebo in the MADRS anhedonia subscale score ≥ 18 subgroup (MADRS total score: 1.5 mg/d = -3.4, p = .0006; 3 mg/d = -2.1, p = .0358; anhedonia subscale score: 1.5 mg/d = -2.1, p = .0010; 3 mg/d = -1.26, p = .0399) and in the anhedonia item 8 score ≥ 4 subgroup for adjunctive cariprazine 1.5 mg/d (MADRS total score: -3.2, p = .0037; anhedonia subscale score: -1.9, p = .0066). Significant differences were seen for adjunctive cariprazine versus adjunctive placebo on several anhedonia subscale single items, including anhedonia item 8 for the 1.5 mg/d dose.
Post hoc analysis.
In patients with MDD and moderate-to-severe anhedonia, adjunctive cariprazine improved symptoms of general depression and anhedonia, suggesting a potential benefit for patients with this clinically significant symptom.
快感缺失是重度抑郁症(MDD)的核心诊断症状。事后分析评估了卡利拉嗪联合抗抑郁药治疗(ADT)对患有MDD和中度至重度快感缺失的患者的疗效。
分析了一项3期阳性、随机、固定剂量(1.5或3mg/d)、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组卡利拉嗪研究(NCT03738215)的数据。在两个快感缺失患者亚组(基线MADRS快感缺失亚量表评分≥18;基线MADRS快感缺失项目8评分≥4)中,使用重复测量的混合效应模型评估事后结果(例如,从基线到第6周MADRS总分、MADRS快感缺失亚量表评分、MADRS快感缺失亚量表项目评分,包括项目8[无法感受])。
大多数患者符合亚组纳入标准(快感缺失亚量表评分≥18 = 584例[77.8%];快感缺失项目8评分≥4 = 508例[67.6%])。在MADRS快感缺失亚量表评分≥18的亚组中,与辅助安慰剂相比,辅助卡利拉嗪从基线变化的最小二乘均差在统计学上有显著差异(MADRS总分:1.5mg/d = -3.4,p = 0.0006;3mg/d = -2.1,p = 0.0358;快感缺失亚量表评分:1.5mg/d = -2.1,p = 0.0010;3mg/d = -1.26,p = 0.0399),在快感缺失项目8评分≥4的亚组中,辅助卡利拉嗪1.5mg/d也有显著差异(MADRS总分:-3.2,p = 0.0037;快感缺失亚量表评分:-1.9,p = 0.0066)。在几个快感缺失亚量表单项上,辅助卡利拉嗪与辅助安慰剂之间存在显著差异,包括1.5mg/d剂量的快感缺失项目8。
事后分析。
在患有MDD和中度至重度快感缺失的患者中,辅助卡利拉嗪改善了总体抑郁和快感缺失症状,表明对有这种具有临床意义症状的患者有潜在益处。