Juul Sophie, Jakobsen Janus Christian, Hestbaek Emilie, Kamp Caroline Barkholt, Olsen Markus Harboe, Rishede Marie, Frandsen Frederik Weischer, Bo Sune, Poulsen Stig, Sørensen Per, Bateman Anthony, Simonsen Sebastian
Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mental Health Center Stolpegård, Copenhagen University Hospital - Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Psychother Psychosom. 2025;94(4):263-272. doi: 10.1159/000544934. Epub 2025 May 8.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe and prevalent psychiatric disorder. Mentalization-based therapy (MBT) is an evidence-based intervention for BPD, which is often delivered as a long-term psychotherapy program for BPD. We previously published a randomized clinical trial assessing short-term versus long-term MBT for BPD 16 months after randomization as the primary follow-up time point. The objective was to assess the long-term (24 months) results of short-term versus long-term MBT for outpatients with BPD.
Adult outpatients (≥18 years) with subthreshold or diagnosed BPD were randomly assigned (1:1) to short-term MBT (5 months) or long-term MBT (14 months). The primary outcome was BPD symptoms assessed with the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder. Secondary outcomes were level of functioning (assessed using the Work and Social Adjustment Scale), quality of life (assessed using Short Form Health Survey, SF-36), global functioning (assessed using the Global Assessment of Functioning, GAF scale), and severe self-harm. All outcomes were assessed at 24 months after randomization.
Between October 4, 2018, and December 3, 2020, we randomly assigned 166 participants to short-term MBT (n = 84) or long-term MBT (n = 82). After 24 months, regression analyses showed no evidence of a difference when assessing the primary outcome, BPD symptoms (ZAN-BPD MD: -0.56; 95% CI: -2.67 to 1.54; p = 0.598), level of functioning (WSAS MD: -1.42; 95% CI: -5.04 to 2.21; p = 0.440), global functioning (GAF MD: 2.51; 95% CI: -1.65 to 6.67; p = 0.234), or severe self-harm (RR: 1.38; 95% CI: 0.88-2.21; p = 0.149). Regression analyses showed evidence of a beneficial effect of long-term MBT when assessing quality of life at 24 months (SF-36 MD: 5.52; 95% CI: 1.72-9.32; p = 0.005), but the result was potentially biased by a large proportion of missing data (40%). We found no evidence of a difference between short-term and long-term MBT on serious adverse events at 24 months (RR: 1.38; 95% CI: 0.88-2.21; p = 0.149). The serious adverse event result had no missing data.
Long-term MBT did not lead to lower levels of BPD symptoms at 24 months after randomization compared with short-term MBT. More trials comparing short-term versus long-term treatment and with fewer missing data are needed to provide better evidence-based guidance.
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)是一种严重且常见的精神疾病。基于心理化的治疗(MBT)是一种针对BPD的循证干预方法,通常作为针对BPD的长期心理治疗项目实施。我们之前发表了一项随机临床试验,在随机分组16个月后评估短期与长期MBT对BPD的疗效,将其作为主要随访时间点。目的是评估短期与长期MBT对BPD门诊患者的长期(24个月)疗效。
成年门诊患者(≥18岁),有阈下或已确诊的BPD,被随机分配(1:1)至短期MBT组(5个月)或长期MBT组(14个月)。主要结局是使用边缘型人格障碍的扎纳里尼评定量表评估的BPD症状。次要结局包括功能水平(使用工作和社会适应量表评估)、生活质量(使用简短健康调查问卷SF-36评估)、整体功能(使用功能总体评估GAF量表评估)以及严重的自我伤害行为。所有结局均在随机分组24个月后进行评估。
在2018年10月4日至2020年12月3日期间,我们将166名参与者随机分配至短期MBT组(n = 84)或长期MBT组(n = 82)。24个月后,回归分析显示,在评估主要结局BPD症状(ZAN-BPD平均差:-0.56;95%置信区间:-2.67至1.54;p = 0.598)、功能水平(WSAS平均差:-1.42;95%置信区间:-5.04至2.21;p = 0.440)、整体功能(GAF平均差:2.51;95%置信区间:-1.65至6.67;p = 0.234)或严重自我伤害行为(风险比:1.38;95%置信区间:第0.88至2.21;p = 0.149)时,没有证据表明存在差异。回归分析显示,在评估24个月时的生活质量时(SF-36平均差:5.52;95%置信区间:1.72至9.32;p = 0.005),长期MBT有有益效果的证据,但该结果可能因大量缺失数据(40%)而存在偏差。我们没有发现短期与长期MBT在24个月时严重不良事件方面存在差异的证据(风险比:1.38;95%置信区间:0.88至2.21;p = 0.149)。严重不良事件结果没有缺失数据。
与短期MBT相比,长期MBT在随机分组24个月后并未使BPD症状水平更低。需要更多比较短期与长期治疗且缺失数据更少的试验,以提供更好的循证指导。