Bohlen Lucas, Biester Anna, Rapp Oliver, Wentzel Jörg, Liem Torsten, Cerritelli Francesco, Schmidt Tobias
Osteopathic Research Institute, Hamburg, Germany; Osteopathie Schule Deutschland, Hamburg, Germany; Institute of Interdisciplinary Exercise Science and Sports Medicine & Institute for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Clinical-based Human Research Department, Foundation COME Collaboration, Pescara, Italy.
Osteopathie Schule Deutschland, Hamburg, Germany; Dresden International University, Dresden, Germany.
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;60:101999. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2025.101999. Epub 2025 May 3.
Chronic back pain conditions are highly prevalent worldwide. Osteopathic treatment seems to improve pain and function in this population. However, the mechanisms underlying osteopathic diagnosis and treatment of the spine are mainly unknown. Arguably, both inflammatory and autonomic processes may be involved, which should entail changes in skin temperature. Primarily, the feasibility of the study protocol was evaluated by assessing the retention, adherence, acceptability, safety, and blinding concealment rates and carrying out a power analysis. Secondarily, we investigated diagnostic correlations between pain ratings, palpatory findings, and skin temperature in spinal segments and therapeutic effects of osteopathic and sham spine manipulations.
In this single-blinded, randomized, and sham-controlled pilot and feasibility study, participants with chronic back pain were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to receive a single session of osteopathic or sham spine manipulations. Manual diagnosis, pain assessment, and infrared imaging were performed before treatment (baseline) and one week after treatment (follow-up), whereas infrared imaging was additionally conducted shortly after treatment (post-intervention).
Seventeen participants completed the trial with 89.5 % retention, 100 % adherence, 100 % acceptability, 6 % adverse events, 22 % (osteopathic) and 50 % (sham) blinding concealment. A power analysis estimated a sample of 40 subjects for future randomized controlled trials. At baseline, no significant correlations were detected between palpatory findings, pain ratings, and skin temperature. There were no significant between-group differences in palpatory findings at single time points and pain ratings across time points (p < 0.05), whereas skin temperature showed significant between-group differences across all time points (p < 0.01). At post-intervention, osteopathic spine manipulations increased the skin temperature with a medium effect (Cohen's d = 0.66).
The study was feasible. Osteopathic diagnosis does not seem to correlate with pain ratings and skin temperature. However, the increase in skin temperature shortly after osteopathic treatment suggests an autonomic (hyper-parasympathetic) effect.
慢性背痛在全球范围内高度普遍。整骨疗法似乎能改善该人群的疼痛和功能。然而,整骨疗法对脊柱的诊断和治疗背后的机制主要尚不清楚。可以说,炎症和自主神经过程可能都参与其中,这应该会导致皮肤温度的变化。首先,通过评估保留率、依从性、可接受性、安全性和盲法隐藏率并进行功效分析来评估研究方案的可行性。其次,我们研究了脊柱节段的疼痛评分、触诊结果和皮肤温度之间的诊断相关性以及整骨手法和假脊柱手法的治疗效果。
在这项单盲、随机、假对照的试点和可行性研究中,慢性背痛患者被随机分配(1:1比例)接受单次整骨或假脊柱手法治疗。在治疗前(基线)和治疗后一周(随访)进行手动诊断、疼痛评估和红外成像,而在治疗后不久(干预后)额外进行红外成像。
17名参与者完成了试验,保留率为89.5%,依从性为100%,可接受性为100%,不良事件发生率为6%,盲法隐藏率为22%(整骨疗法组)和50%(假手法组)。功效分析估计未来随机对照试验的样本量为40名受试者。在基线时,未检测到触诊结果、疼痛评分和皮肤温度之间的显著相关性。在单个时间点的触诊结果和各时间点的疼痛评分方面,组间无显著差异(p < 0.05),而皮肤温度在所有时间点均显示出显著的组间差异(p < 0.01)。在干预后,整骨脊柱手法使皮肤温度升高,效果中等(科恩d值 = 0.66)。
该研究是可行的。整骨诊断似乎与疼痛评分和皮肤温度无关。然而,整骨治疗后不久皮肤温度的升高表明存在自主神经(副交感神经亢进)效应。