Zhou Jian, Bai Li, Luo Jia, Bai Yuxian, Pan Yaozhen, Yang Xinrong, Gao Yufeng, Shi Rongshu, Zhang Wenhua, Zheng Jinfang, Hua Xiangdong, Xu Aibing, Hu Sheng, Zhang Feng, Yang Xiaojun, Da Mingxu, Wang Rui, Ma Jie, Jia Weidong, Quan Dongmei, Peng Chuang, Yang Wei, Yin Guowen, Qi Yue, Zhang Guifang, Du Xilin, Mao Xiaorong, Meng Zhiqiang, Jiao Shunchang, Fan Jia
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lancet Oncol. 2025 Jun;26(6):719-731. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00190-1. Epub 2025 May 8.
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy combinations have revolutionised the therapeutic landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but not all yield a significant overall survival benefit, underscoring the need for novel effective agents. Anlotinib plus penpulimab has demonstrated encouraging activity and safety in a phase 2 study. In this phase 3 trial, we aimed to assess whether the combination of anlotinib plus penpulimab improved survival versus sorafenib in patients with unresectable HCC. METHODS: APOLLO was a multicentre, open-label, parallel-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 79 centres in China. Patients aged 18-75 years with unresectable HCC, no previous systemic therapy, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (2:1) to anlotinib (10 mg orally once daily on days 1-14) plus penpulimab (200 mg intravenously on day 1), or sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily) every 3 weeks. Randomisation was done centrally using block randomisation with a fixed block size of 3 and stratified by the presence of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis, α-fetoprotein concentration, and ECOG performance status. Sex (male or female) and ethnicity (Chinese or other) were self-reported. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival assessed by masked independent review committee and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one recorded safety assessment. Final progression-free survival and second interim overall survival analyses are presented. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04344158, and follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: From Aug 11, 2020, to June 20, 2023, 940 patients were screened for inclusion in the trial, 291 were excluded, and 649 were randomly assigned to an intervention (433 were assigned to the anlotinib plus penpulimab group and 216 were assigned to the sorafenib group. 551 (85%) of the 649 patients were male and 98 (15%) were female. All patients were Chinese with a median age of 57 years (IQR 50-65). For the final analysis of progression-free survival (June 5, 2023), 636 patients (424 patients in the anlotinib plus penpulimab group vs 212 patients in the sorafenib group) comprised the intention-to-treat population. For the second interim analysis of overall survival (Jan 29, 2024), 649 patients (433 vs 216) comprised the intention-to-treat population. Median follow-up was 6·2 months (IQR 5·5-7·5) for the anlotinib plus penpulimab group and 4·2 months (2·9-7·1) for the sorafenib group for final progression-free survival analysis, and 15·3 months (14·3-17·3) for the anlotinib plus penpulimab group and 14·5 months (11·5-17·0) for the sorafenib group for the second interim overall survival analysis. Median progression-free survival was significantly extended with anlotinib plus penpulimab versus sorafenib (6·9 months [95% CI 5·8-8·0] vs 2·8 months [2·7-4·1]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·52 [95% CI 0·41-0·66]; p<0·0001). Median overall survival was significantly prolonged with anlotinib plus penpulimab compared with sorafenib (16·5 months [95% CI 14·7-19·0] vs 13·2 months [9·7-16·9]; HR 0·69 [95% CI 0·55-0·87]; p=0·0014). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (75 [17%] patients in the anlotinib plus penpulimab group vs 22 [10%] in the sorafenib group) and decrease in platelet count (39 [9%] vs 13 [6%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 90 (21%) and 19 (9%) patients in the respective groups; treatment-related deaths occurred in one (<1%) patient in the anlotinib plus penpulimab group (upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage) and two (1%) patients in the sorafenib group (hepatic failure and death of unknown cause). INTERPRETATION: Anlotinib plus penpulimab significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival versus sorafenib in unresectable HCC and might be a new first-line option. These findings require verification in other regions of the world. FUNDING: Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group.
背景:免疫治疗联合方案已彻底改变了晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗格局,但并非所有方案都能带来显著的总生存获益,这凸显了对新型有效药物的需求。在一项2期研究中,安罗替尼联合派安普利单抗已显示出令人鼓舞的活性和安全性。在这项3期试验中,我们旨在评估安罗替尼联合派安普利单抗与索拉非尼相比,是否能改善不可切除HCC患者的生存情况。 方法:APOLLO是一项在中国79个中心进行的多中心、开放标签、平行对照、随机3期试验。年龄在18 - 75岁、患有不可切除HCC、既往未接受过全身治疗且东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态为0或1的患者,被随机分配(2:1)接受安罗替尼(第1 - 14天每天口服10 mg)联合派安普利单抗(第1天静脉注射200 mg),或索拉非尼(每3周口服400 mg,每日2次)。随机分组通过中央集中使用固定区组大小为3的区组随机化进行,并根据是否存在大血管侵犯或肝外转移、甲胎蛋白浓度和ECOG体能状态进行分层。性别(男或女)和种族(中国或其他)通过自我报告获取。共同主要终点是由盲态独立审查委员会评估的无进展生存期和意向性治疗人群的总生存期。在所有接受至少一剂研究药物且至少有一次记录的安全性评估的参与者中评估安全性。呈现最终的无进展生存期和第二次中期总生存期分析结果。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT04344158,随访正在进行中。 结果:从2020年8月11日至2023年6月20日,940例患者被筛选纳入试验,291例被排除,649例被随机分配至干预组(433例被分配至安罗替尼联合派安普利单抗组,216例被分配至索拉非尼组)。649例患者中551例(85%)为男性,98例(15%)为女性。所有患者均为中国人,中位年龄为57岁(四分位间距50 - 65岁)。对于无进展生存期的最终分析(2023年6月5日),636例患者(安罗替尼联合派安普利单抗组424例,索拉非尼组212例)构成意向性治疗人群。对于总生存期的第二次中期分析(2024年1月29日),649例患者(433例对216例)构成意向性治疗人群。在最终无进展生存期分析中,安罗替尼联合派安普利单抗组的中位随访时间为6.2个月(四分位间距5.5 - 7.5个月),索拉非尼组为4.2个月(2.9 - 7.1个月);在第二次中期总生存期分析中,安罗替尼联合派安普利单抗组为15.3个月(14.3 - 17.3个月),索拉非尼组为14.5个月(11.5 - 17.0个月)。与索拉非尼相比,安罗替尼联合派安普利单抗使中位无进展生存期显著延长(6.9个月[95%置信区间5.8 - 8.0]对2.8个月[2.7 - 4.1];风险比[HR]0.52[95%置信区间0.41 - 0.66];p<0.0001)。与索拉非尼相比,安罗替尼联合派安普利单抗使中位总生存期显著延长(16.5个月[95%置信区间14.7 - 19.0]对13.2个月[9.7 - 16.9];HR 0.69[95%置信区间0.55 - 0.87];p = 0.00
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024-4
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2025-8-5
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025-6-30