Advances in endovascular brain computer interface: Systematic review and future implications.

BACKGROUND

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) translate neural activity into real-world commands. While traditional invasive BCIs necessitate craniotomy, endovascular BCIs offer a minimally invasive alternative using the venous system for electrode placement.

NEW METHOD

This systematic review evaluates the technical feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of endovascular BCIs, discussing their future implications. A systematic review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. The search spanned PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases using keywords related to neural interfaces and endovascular approaches. Studies were included if they reported on endovascular BCIs in preclinical or clinical settings. Dual independent screening and extraction focused on electrode material, recording capabilities, safety parameters, and clinical efficacy.

RESULTS

From 1385 initial publications, 26 met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen studies investigated the Stentrode device. Among the 24 preclinical studies, 16 used ovine or rodent models, and 9 addressed engineering or simulation aspects. Two clinical studies reported six ALS patients successfully using an endovascular BCI for digital communication. Preclinical data established the endovascular ovine model, demonstrating stable neural recordings and vascular changes with long-term implantation. Key challenges include thrombosis risk, long-term electrode stability, and anatomical variability.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS

Endovascular BCI reduced invasiveness, improved safety profiles, with comparable neural recording fidelity to invasive methods, and promising preliminary clinical outcomes in severely paralyzed patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Early results are promising, but clinical data remain scarce. Further research is needed to optimize signal processing, enhance electrode biocompatibility, and refine endovascular procedures for broader clinical applications.