Soetikno Brian T, Tran Elaine M, Wai Karen M, Mruthyunjaya Prithvi, Rahimy Ehsan, Koo Euna B
Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California; Department of Ophthalmology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, California.
J AAPOS. 2025 Jun;29(3):104216. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2025.104216. Epub 2025 May 10.
To examine the rate of diplopia, strabismus, and interventions for strabismus after pneumatic retinopexy, scleral buckle, and pars plana vitrectomy with and without scleral buckle for primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).
This retrospective cohort study draws on deidentified EHR data of over 126 million patients in the TriNetX Analytics platform, a federated health research network. Subjects were assigned to three cohorts: pneumatic retinopexy (PR) alone, scleral buckle (SB) alone, or pars plana vitrectomy with or without scleral buckle (PPV+/-SB). Univariate analyses and propensity score matching (PSM) sensitivity analyses were conducted. Main outcomes were the risk of diplopia, strabismus, sensorimotor examination, or strabismus interventions, including chemodenervation or surgery. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed.
A total of 25,169 subjects were identified: PR (n = 1,646), SB (n = 3,658), and PPV+/-SB (n = 19,865). SB had the highest rates of diplopia (2.73%) and strabismus (1.79%), followed by PPV+/-SB (diplopia, 2.28%; strabismus, 1.46%) and PR (diplopia, 1.54%; strabismus, 0.612%). SB and PPV+/-SB had a significantly higher risk of diplopia (P < 0.01) and strabismus (P < 0.001) compared to PR. No significant differences were observed between PPV+/-SB and SB (P = 0.106 and P = 0.139). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated SB had the highest hazard during the first year after surgery. Strabismus interventions were rare, with surgery in ≤0.27% of the SB cohort, 0.22% of the PPV+/-SB cohort, and ≤0.61% of the PR cohort. No subjects underwent chemodenervation.
The risk of diplopia and strabismus after RRD treatments is low. SB carries the highest risk, followed by PPV+/-SB and PR. These findings support informed decision making in selecting RRD repair techniques.
研究气体视网膜固定术、巩膜扣带术以及有无巩膜扣带的玻璃体切割术治疗原发性孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)后复视、斜视的发生率及斜视的干预措施。
这项回顾性队列研究利用了联合健康研究网络TriNetX分析平台中超过1.26亿患者的去识别电子健康记录(EHR)数据。受试者被分为三个队列:单纯气体视网膜固定术(PR)、单纯巩膜扣带术(SB)、有或无巩膜扣带的玻璃体切割术(PPV+/-SB)。进行了单因素分析和倾向评分匹配(PSM)敏感性分析。主要结局是复视、斜视、感觉运动检查或斜视干预(包括化学去神经支配或手术)的风险。进行了Kaplan-Meier分析。
共识别出25169名受试者:PR组(n = 1646)、SB组(n = 3658)和PPV+/-SB组(n = 19865)。SB组的复视(2.73%)和斜视(1.79%)发生率最高,其次是PPV+/-SB组(复视2.28%;斜视1.46%)和PR组(复视1.54%;斜视0.612%)。与PR组相比,SB组和PPV+/-SB组的复视(P < 0.01)和斜视(P < 0.001)风险显著更高。PPV+/-SB组和SB组之间未观察到显著差异(P = 0.106和P = 0.139)。Kaplan-Meier分析表明,SB组在术后第一年的风险最高。斜视干预很少见,SB组中手术治疗的比例≤0.27%,PPV+/-SB组为0.22%,PR组≤0.61%。没有受试者接受化学去神经支配治疗。
RRD治疗后复视和斜视的风险较低。SB的风险最高,其次是PPV+/-SB和PR。这些发现有助于在选择RRD修复技术时做出明智的决策。