Evaluating linked ICD-10 Medicare claims data as a method of dementia case ascertainment in research settings.

INTRODUCTION

US Medicare claims can be used to identify dementia cases for research. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) code definitions versus research-based dementia ascertainment.

METHODS

Participants of five Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center (RADC) cohorts with study visits between October 2015 and December 2019 and fee-for-service Medicare contributed observations. For each observation, we compared research-based dementia status to dementia status based on six ICD-10 code definitions.

RESULTS

A total of 1869 participants contributed 5309 observations (mean age 82.9 years, 21.0% Black, 9.3% met research-based dementia criteria). The accuracy of ICD-10 code definitions was high (87%-90%); five of six code definitions favored specificity over sensitivity. All ICD-10 code definitions were less accurate among subgroups defined by older age, minoritized race, increased depressive symptoms, and history of stroke.

DISCUSSION

Performance of ICD-10 code definitions mirrored that of ICD-9 code definitions. Awareness of differential performance by participant characteristics can improve the robustness of research.

HIGHLIGHTS

We report the performance of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) code versus research-based dementia ascertainment. ICD-10 performed worse with age, depressive symptoms, minoritized race, and stroke. Awareness of accuracy and differential performance can improve research robustness.