• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于可达性和步行便利性评估中国不同地区社区卫生服务中心的可及公平性。

Evaluating the equity of access to community health service centers in different regions of China based on cyclability and walkability.

作者信息

Xu Zhenhua, Chang Jiaying, Han Cong

机构信息

School of Urban Construction, Beijing City University, Beijing, China.

Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 28;13:1563750. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1563750. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1563750
PMID:40356830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12066340/
Abstract

With China's rapid urbanization and aging population, ensuring equitable access to essential facilities in Community Health Service Centers (CHSCs) is critical for delivering primary healthcare to older adults. These centers serve as the frontline for managing chronic diseases, promoting healthy aging, and reducing healthcare disparities among the older adults. This study investigates the equity of CHSCs across eastern, central, and western regions of China using indicators of cyclability and walkability, both of which are essential for older populations who often rely on active travel modes due to physical or economic limitations. A total of 110 nationally ranked CHSCs were selected for analysis. Geographic Information System (GIS) technology was used to assess cyclability, defined by a 1,000-meter residential area coverage, and walkability, represented by the average Walk Score. Results show that the cyclability scores for the eastern, central, and western regions were 0.71, 0.64, and 0.46, respectively, below the national standard of a 3,000-meter service radius, highlighting insufficient cycling access to primary care for older residents. Walkability scores were 0.351, 0.388, and 0.287, with lower values, particularly concerning aging populations with limited mobility. These findings reveal pronounced regional disparities and point to the need for spatial optimization of CHSCs, increased facility provision, and targeted resource allocation to western regions. By enhancing the active accessibility of community healthcare services, particularly for older adults, this research provides policy-relevant evidence to advance equity, promote healthy aging, and support sustainable public health planning in China.

摘要

随着中国城市化的快速发展和人口老龄化,确保社区卫生服务中心(CHSCs)基本设施的公平可及性对于为老年人提供初级医疗保健至关重要。这些中心是管理慢性病、促进健康老龄化以及减少老年人医疗差距的前沿阵地。本研究使用可达性和步行便利性指标,对中国东部、中部和西部地区的社区卫生服务中心的公平性进行了调查,这两个指标对于因身体或经济限制而经常依赖主动出行方式的老年人群体来说都至关重要。总共选取了110家全国排名靠前的社区卫生服务中心进行分析。利用地理信息系统(GIS)技术评估可达性(以1000米居民区覆盖范围来定义)和步行便利性(以平均步行得分来表示)。结果显示,东部、中部和西部地区的可达性得分分别为0.71、0.64和0.46,低于3000米服务半径的国家标准,这凸显了老年居民前往初级保健机构的骑行可达性不足。步行便利性得分分别为0.351、0.388和0.287,得分较低,这对于行动不便的老年人群体尤其值得关注。这些发现揭示了明显的地区差异,并表明需要对社区卫生服务中心进行空间优化、增加设施供应以及有针对性地向西部地区分配资源。通过提高社区医疗服务的主动可达性,特别是针对老年人,本研究提供了与政策相关的证据,以促进公平、推动健康老龄化并支持中国可持续的公共卫生规划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/635ca303171c/fpubh-13-1563750-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/3e1a18253e03/fpubh-13-1563750-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/468af82d3102/fpubh-13-1563750-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/1bf4b446b831/fpubh-13-1563750-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/25761ef73271/fpubh-13-1563750-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/d8cf252653ab/fpubh-13-1563750-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/8ca1768b36d1/fpubh-13-1563750-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/b97c1a53d4ac/fpubh-13-1563750-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/ed4b7b5bb740/fpubh-13-1563750-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/1c9973accd1d/fpubh-13-1563750-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/635ca303171c/fpubh-13-1563750-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/3e1a18253e03/fpubh-13-1563750-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/468af82d3102/fpubh-13-1563750-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/1bf4b446b831/fpubh-13-1563750-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/25761ef73271/fpubh-13-1563750-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/d8cf252653ab/fpubh-13-1563750-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/8ca1768b36d1/fpubh-13-1563750-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/b97c1a53d4ac/fpubh-13-1563750-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/ed4b7b5bb740/fpubh-13-1563750-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/1c9973accd1d/fpubh-13-1563750-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd68/12066340/635ca303171c/fpubh-13-1563750-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the equity of access to community health service centers in different regions of China based on cyclability and walkability.基于可达性和步行便利性评估中国不同地区社区卫生服务中心的可及公平性。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 28;13:1563750. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1563750. eCollection 2025.
2
Introducing the dataset for measuring centrality for sustainability-A case study of Pecinci municipality, Serbia.介绍用于衡量可持续性中心性的数据集——以塞尔维亚佩钦奇市为例
Data Brief. 2025 May 27;61:111714. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2025.111714. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Inequities in the continuum of maternal care in Mexico: trends before and after COVID-19.墨西哥孕产妇护理连续过程中的不平等现象:新冠疫情前后的趋势
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 17;24(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02470-x.
4
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
5
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
6
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
8
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的耳道清理(耳部清洁)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub3.
9
"There's just such a mismatch": a qualitative exploration of health systems and organizational-level barriers to accessing cancer services among people experiencing structural marginalization.“存在如此严重的不匹配”:对经历结构性边缘化的人群在获取癌症服务方面的卫生系统和组织层面障碍的定性探索。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 18;24(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02554-8.
10
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的电子烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9.

本文引用的文献

1
Walkability and urban built environments-a systematic review of health impact assessments (HIA).步行性与城市建成环境——健康影响评估(HIA)的系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 17;23(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15394-4.
2
Trajectory of Smoking and Incidence of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease among Korean Young Adult Men.韩国年轻男性吸烟轨迹与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病发病风险
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 24;16(12):2219. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122219.
3
Community Health Centers and Access to Care Among Underserved Populations: A Synthesis Review.
社区卫生中心与服务不足人群的医疗服务可及性:综合综述。
Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Feb;77(1):3-18. doi: 10.1177/1077558719848283. Epub 2019 May 13.
4
Equity and efficiency of primary health care resource allocation in mainland China.中国内地基本医疗资源配置的公平与效率。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Sep 12;17(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0851-8.
5
A systematic review about costing methodology in robotic surgery: evidence for low quality in most of the studies.关于机器人手术成本核算方法的系统评价:大多数研究证据质量较低。
Health Econ Rev. 2018 Sep 7;8(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13561-018-0207-5.
6
Factors influencing choice of health system access level in China: A systematic review.影响中国卫生系统就诊层级选择的因素:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 10;13(8):e0201887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201887. eCollection 2018.
7
The primary health-care system in China.中国的基层医疗保健系统。
Lancet. 2017 Dec 9;390(10112):2584-2594. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33109-4. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
8
A mediation approach to understanding socio-economic inequalities in maternal health-seeking behaviours in Egypt.一种用于理解埃及孕产妇寻求医疗行为中社会经济不平等现象的中介效应方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 21;15:1. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0652-8.
9
The political determinants of health--10 years on.健康的政治决定因素——十年之后
BMJ. 2015 Jan 8;350:h81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h81.
10
Global health in foreign policy--and foreign policy in health? Evidence from the BRICS.外交政策中的全球健康——以及健康领域的外交政策?来自金砖国家的证据。
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Sep;29(6):763-73. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt063. Epub 2013 Sep 25.