Shintani Ryosuke, Sekino Motohiro, Sato Shuntaro, Morimoto Takayuki, Kaneko Shohei, Iwasaki Naoya, Araki Hiroshi, Ichinomiya Taiga, Higashijima Ushio, Hara Tetsuya
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, JPN.
Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, JPN.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 12;17(4):e82131. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82131. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Peripheral perfusion monitoring is crucial for the management of critically ill patients because abnormal peripheral perfusion is associated with a poor prognosis. The peripheral perfusion index (PPI), derived from pulse oximetry, quantifies peripheral perfusion but varies across fingers. A pulse oximeter probe may cause burns when worn at the same site. Therefore, changing the site has been recommended. However, changes in PPI values owing to probe replacement reduce the reliability of clinical and research applications. No two fingers with equivalent PPI values have been identified yet. This study assessed the interfinger differences in PPI by measuring the five fingers simultaneously and identified the two fingers with the least fluctuation in values.
A total of 30 healthy volunteers were included in this single-center prospective exploratory study. For PPI measurements, the pulse amplitude index (PAI) was measured using a pulse oximeter on a bedside monitor (Life Scope PT; Nihon Kohden Corp., Tokyo, Japan). The tape-type disposable pulse oximeter probes were attached to each of the five fingertips of the dominant hand, and measurements were conducted in three rooms with different temperatures (16°C, 22°C, and 28°C) to induce thermoregulatory responses and capture a wide range of PAI values. The primary endpoint was the PAI in pairs of two fingers each (a total of 10 pairs). Paired t-tests with Bonferroni correction were used to compare finger pairs, with statistical significance defined as < 0.005.
The combination with the least difference in PAI was the index-ring finger combination (0.07% ± 1.89%, = 0.74), followed by the middle-ring finger (0.45% ± 1.93%, = 0.03) and index-middle finger combinations (0.52% ± 2.05%, = 0.02). All other finger combinations showed statistically significant differences ( < 0.001).
PPI values measured using the pulse oximeter showed the smallest interfinger difference between the index and ring fingers. If changing the finger to which the probe is attached during clinical or research use is needed, it may be possible to consistently measure the PPI values by alternately attaching the probe to the index and ring fingers.
外周灌注监测对于危重症患者的管理至关重要,因为外周灌注异常与预后不良相关。通过脉搏血氧饱和度测定得出的外周灌注指数(PPI)可量化外周灌注,但不同手指的PPI值有所差异。脉搏血氧饱和度测定仪探头长时间佩戴在同一部位可能会导致灼伤。因此,建议更换测量部位。然而,因更换探头导致的PPI值变化会降低临床和研究应用的可靠性。目前尚未发现PPI值相当的两根手指。本研究通过同时测量五根手指来评估手指间PPI的差异,并找出PPI值波动最小的两根手指。
本单中心前瞻性探索性研究共纳入30名健康志愿者。为测量PPI,使用床边监护仪(Life Scope PT;日本光电株式会社,东京,日本)上的脉搏血氧饱和度测定仪测量脉搏幅度指数(PAI)。将带状一次性脉搏血氧饱和度测定仪探头分别连接到优势手的五根指尖,在三个不同温度(16°C、22°C和28°C)的房间进行测量,以引发体温调节反应并获取广泛的PAI值。主要终点是每两根手指配对(共10对)的PAI。采用经Bonferroni校正的配对t检验比较手指配对情况,统计学显著性定义为P<0.005。
PAI差异最小的组合是示指 - 环指组合(0.07%±1.89%,P = 0.74),其次是中指 - 环指组合(0.45%±1.93%,P = 0.03)和示指 - 中指组合(0.52%±2.05%,P = 0.02)。所有其他手指组合均显示出统计学显著差异(P<0.001)。
使用脉搏血氧饱和度测定仪测量的PPI值在示指和环指之间的手指间差异最小。如果在临床或研究使用中需要更换探头所连接的手指,或许可以通过交替将探头连接到示指和环指来持续测量PPI值。